More frequent partner hugs and higher oxytocin levels are linked to lower blood pressure and heart rate in premenopausal women.

Department of Psychiatry, University of North Carolina, CB 7175 Medical Building A, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7175, USA.
Biological Psychology (Impact Factor: 3.47). 05/2005; 69(1):5-21. DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2004.11.002
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT In animals, ventral stroking for >5 days increases oxytocin (OT) activity and decreases blood pressure (BP), but related human studies are few. Thus, relationships between self-reported frequency of partner hugs, plasma OT and BP levels were examined in 59 premenopausal women before and after warm contact with their husbands/partners ending with hugs. Higher baseline OT before partner contact was associated with lower BP and heart rate, and met criteria to be a partial mediator of the lower resting BP shown by women reporting more frequent hugs (P<0.05). OT levels during post-contact stress were unrelated to hugs or BP. Menstrual cycle phase did not influence any OT measure. Thus, frequent hugs between spouses/partners are associated with lower BP and higher OT levels in premenopausal women; OT-mediated reduction in central adrenergic activity and peripheral effects of OT on the heart and vasculature are pathways to examine in future research.

  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Introduction Social relationships can have a significant impact on psychological wellbeing, health and human disease. For instance, it is well known that individuals with low levels of social support have higher morbidity and mortality rates, especially from cardiovascular disease [1-6]. The precise mechanisms by which social support affects morbidity and mortality are still unclear [3,5,7]. One proposal is that having others to turn to for help or to disclose personal problems may enhance subjective wellbeing directly and may also facilitate coping with stress. Although much of this research has been correlational in nature and is therefore subject to alternative interpretations, the consistency of results across studies of diverse populations has fostered an emerging consensus regarding the benefits of social ties. Indeed, there is evidence that social support appears to be linked with lower ambulatory blood pressure and lower cortisol levels [8]. Further, experimental work has shown that the presence of a friend in a stressful situation is associated with lower blood pressure [8], while embraces from a partner prior to a stressful event increases oxytocin (which acts as an endogenous analgesic) and reduces blood pressure in women [9]. Given the growing body of research on the relationship between psychological wellbeing, health and illness, it is perhaps surprising that this field has not yet been fully integrated into our current understanding of ego-centric social networks. Human social network analysis has recently become a useful and powerful tool for analyzing the collective thoughts and behaviors of large groups of individuals [10]. For example, a wide range of behaviors and psychological states can spread from person to person within social networks, including obesity [11], smoking [12], happiness [13], loneliness [14], and depression [15]. Furthermore, human social networks exhibit a complex organised structure. Ego-centric social networks appear to consist of a series of sub-groupings of personal acquaintanceship arranged in concentric circles [16,17], at the centre of which sits the network " owner " (conventionally denoted as 'ego'). A social network can be broken down into the following sub-groupings: the support group (core of 3-5 intimates), sympathy group (12-20 close friends or family), the affinity group (45-50 acquaintances), and the active network (150 familiar individuals) [17], these values being successively inclusive. The number 150 appears to be the typical limit on the number of individuals with whom a person can have meaningful relationships [18]. Moreover, it appears that there is a distinct upper limit on both the frequency of contacts and the emotional intensity of the relationship an individual can maintain with each contact in the network: as the number of contacts in the network increases, both the emotional closeness and the frequency of contact decreases [19]. Several studies of friendships and close relationships have distinguished different levels of relationship intimacy without focusing explicitly on network structure [20-22]. For example [20] compared close and casual friendships and found that close friendships showed more interactions during the week, and across a wider range of days, times, and locations than casual friendships. In terms of benefits received, close friends offered more emotional and instrumental support than casual ones. Indeed, the most commonly used classification in these studies is best, close and casual friend [21,22]. Oswald et al. (2004) assessed friendship in terms of different dimensions of friendship maintenance behaviours (positivity, supportiveness, openness and interaction), and Abstract Background: The present study investigated the effects of supportive social network ties on health in a sample of mothers with a young child. The aim of this study was to examine if Liverpool participants having a large supportive network of close relatives reported less cases of illness than participants without such social support.
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Animals establish privileged relationships with specific partners, which are treated differently from other conspecifics, and contribute to behavioral variation. However, there is limited information on the underlying physiological mechanisms involved in the establishment of these privileged ties and their relationship to individual cooperation levels. The Indo-Pacific bluestreak cleaner wrasse Labroides dimidiatus often forages in mixed-sex pairs when cleaning fish clients. Intra-couple conflicts often arise during a joint client inspection, which may alter the overall quality of cleaning service provided. Here we tested two hypotheses: a) whether intra-pair association (i.e. association index), measured with joint interspecific cleaning and intraspecific behavior, is correlated with neuroendocrine mechanisms involving forebrain neuropeptides arginine vasotocin (AVT) and isotocin (IT) and b) whether these neuropeptide level shifts relate to an individual's interspecific service quality. We found that partner support (number of cleaning interactions and tactile stimulation) received by male cleaners increased with association index. When cleaners inspected clients alone, cleaners' cheating decreased with association index for females but not males. AVT levels did not differ according to sex or association level. Forebrain IT levels increased with association index for males, whereas no relationship was found for females. Finally, cleaner cheating varied between sex and forebrain IT levels. Findings indicate that variation in pairs' relationships influences male and female cleaner fish differently and contributes to the variation of brain neuropeptide levels, which is linked to distinct cooperative outcomes. Copyright © 2015. Published by Elsevier Inc.
    Physiology & Behavior 03/2015; 145. DOI:10.1016/j.physbeh.2015.03.024 · 3.03 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Cancer survivors experience high levels of distress, associated with a host of negative psychological states, including anxiety, depression, and fear of recurrence, which often lead to sleep problems and reduction in quality of life (QOL) and well-being. As a neuropeptide hormone associated with affiliation, calmness, and well-being, oxytocin may be a useful biological measure of changes in health outcomes in cancer survivors. In this exploratory study, which comprised a subset of participants from a larger study, we evaluated (a) the feasibility and reliability of salivary oxytocin (sOT) levels in cancer survivors and (b) the effects of 2 sleep-focused mind-body interventions, mind-body bridging (MBB) and mindfulness meditation (MM), compared with a sleep hygiene education (SHE) control, on changes in sOT levels in 30 cancer survivors with self-reported sleep disturbance. Interventions were conducted in 3 sessions, once per week for 3 weeks. Saliva samples were collected at baseline, postintervention (~1 week after the last session), and at the 2-month follow-up. In this cancer survivor group, we found that intra-individual sOT levels were fairly stable across the 3 time points, of about 3 months' duration, and mean baseline sOT levels did not differ between females and males and were not correlated with age. Correlations between baseline sOT and self-report measures were weak; however, several of these relationships were in the predicted direction, in which sOT levels were negatively associated with sleep problems and depression and positively associated with cancer-related QOL and well-being. Regarding intervention effects on sOT, baseline-subtracted sOT levels were significantly larger at postintervention in the MBB group as compared with those in SHE. In this sample of cancer survivors assessed for sOT, at postintervention, greater reductions in sleep problems were noted for MBB and MM compared with that of SHE, and increases in mindfulness and self-compassion were observed in the MBB group compared with those in SHE. The findings in this exploratory study suggest that sOT may be a reliable biological measure over time that may provide insight into the effects of mind-body interventions on health outcomes in cancer survivors. © The Author(s) 2015.
    Integrative Cancer Therapies 04/2015; DOI:10.1177/1534735415580675 · 2.01 Impact Factor

Full-text (2 Sources)

Available from
May 22, 2014