Development and Implementation of an Emergency Practitioner-Performed Brief Intervention for Hazardous and Harmful Drinkers in the Emergency Department

Department of Psychiatry, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, United States
Academic Emergency Medicine (Impact Factor: 2.2). 04/2005; 12(3):249-56. DOI: 10.1197/j.aem.2004.10.021
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT 1) To develop and teach a brief intervention (BI) for "hazardous and harmful" (HH) drinkers in the emergency department (ED); 2) to determine whether emergency practitioners (EPs) (faculty, residents, and physician associates) can demonstrate proficiency in the intervention; and 3) to determine whether it is feasible for EPs to perform the BI during routine clinical care.
The Brief Negotiation Interview (BNI) was developed for a population of HH drinkers. EPs working in an urban, teaching hospital were trained during two-hour skills-based sessions. They were then tested for adherence to and competence with the BNI protocol using standardized patient scenarios and a checklist of critical components of the BNI. Finally, the EPs performed the BNI as part of routine ED clinical care in the context of a randomized controlled trial to test the efficacy of BI on patient outcomes.
The BNI was developed, modified, and finalized in a manual, based on pilot testing. Eleven training sessions with 58 EPs were conducted from March 2002 to August 2003. Ninety-one percent (53/58) of the trained EPs passed the proficiency examination; 96% passed after remediation. Two EPs left prior to remediation. Subsequently, 247 BNIs were performed by 47 EPs. The mean (+/- standard deviation) number of BNIs per EP was 5.28 (+/- 4.91; range 0-28). The mean duration of the BNI was 7.75 minutes (+/- 3.18; range 4-24).
A BNI for HH drinkers can be successfully developed for EPs. EPs can demonstrate proficiency in performing the BNI in routine ED clinical practice.

Download full-text


Available from: Linda C Degutis, Sep 02, 2014
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Objective. To describe emergency department (ED) staff attitudes and beliefs towards patients presenting with hazardous alcohol use and their clinical management. Methods. A search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, SCOPUS from 1990 to 2010, and reference lists from included studies was conducted. Two reviewers independently screened for inclusion and assessed study quality. One reviewer extracted the data and a second checked for completeness and accuracy. Results. Among nine studies four reported varied beliefs on whether screening was worthwhile for identifying hazardous alcohol use (physicians: 42%–88%; nurses: 50%–100%). Physicians in three studies were divided on intervention provision (32%–54% in support of intervention provision) as were nurses in two studies (39% and 64% nurses in support of intervention provision). Referral for treatment was identified in two studies as an important part of ED management (physicians: 62% and 97%; nurses: 95%). Other attitudes and beliefs identified across the studies included concern that asking about alcohol consumption would be seen as obtrusive or offensive, and a perceived lack of time and resources available for providing care and referrals. Conclusions. ED staff had varying attitudes towards ED management of patients with hazardous alcohol use. Investigations into improving clinical care for hazardous alcohol use are needed to optimize ED management for these patients.
    11/2012; 2012. DOI:10.5402/2012/837380
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background Recent guidelines recommend universal substance abuse screening for all trauma patients age 12 and older, because brief interventions can help prevent future trauma. However, little is known about actual rates of screening in this setting. Methods The Illinois State Trauma Registry was queried for severely injured patients from 1999-2009. Multivariate logistic regression was used to characterize which patients were screened with blood alcohol and urine toxicology and which screened positive, according to demographic and physiologic parameters. Results Of 12,264 pediatric patients, 40% were tested for alcohol and 37% for drugs. 9% of patients screened positive for alcohol and 8% for drugs. Age strongly predicted positive tests, as did male gender. Black and Hispanic patients were screened for alcohol most frequently, but only Hispanics were more likely to test positive. Conclusions Although current guidelines recommend screening all trauma patients 12 and older, current practice falls far short of this goal.
    The American Journal of Surgery 10/2014; 208(4). DOI:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2014.06.003 · 2.41 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: On an almost daily basis, primary care clinicians have an opportunity to interact with patients who drink too much. Sometimes the patient comes in for an alcohol-related injury, sometimes there are clues on a routine visit, but the extent of alcohol use often is not clear until the clinician questions the patient. How you interact with the patient, what you say, and how you say it have a lot to do with whether the patient will be responsive or even consider making a change in drinking. Brief intervention is a format that can be integrated into the clinician's history taking. Investing the time to talk to patients about their alcohol use has the potential to make a difference in their lives.
    The Journal for Nurse Practitioners 02/2006; DOI:10.1016/j.nurpra.2005.12.020