Validation of Mean Arterial Pressure as an Indicator of Acute Changes in Cardiac Output

Columbia University, New York, New York, United States
ASAIO Journal (Impact Factor: 1.52). 01/2005; 51(1):22-5. DOI: 10.1097/01.MAT.0000150506.36603.1B
Source: PubMed


Changes in mean arterial pressure (MAP) are often assumed to reflect changes in cardiac output (CO). A linear relationship is postulated to exist between these two quantities based upon the circuit model for systemic circulation. Previous studies have correlated changes in CO and MAP. However, to our knowledge, no studies have tested the relationship between CO and MAP in vivo without changes in systemic vascular resistance. Research on baroreceptor stimulation and vasomotor response has shown that vasomotor tone changes 15 to 60 seconds after an acute change in CO. Maximal activation of vasomotor response occurs after approximately 30 seconds. Thus MAP should correlate directly with CO during acute changes (< 15 seconds). To test this, we examined the relationship between CO and MAP during 10 second occlusions of the inferior vena cava in anesthetized pigs. A linear relationship existed between CO and MAP in seven pigs (%MAP = 0.60[%CO] - 0.41, p = 0.0001). This study validates the use of MAP as an indicator of acute changes in CO. Fluctuations in MAP correlate well with acute changes in CO in the absence of changes in vascular tone.

Download full-text


Available from: Santos Cabreriza,
40 Reads
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: La mesure de la pression artérielle systémique est un élément essentiel du diagnostic positif, du diagnostic de gravité, de la prise en charge thérapeutique et de la surveillance des patients hospitalisés en réanimation, en particulier au cours des états de choc. La pression artérielle est la grandeur régulée du système cardiovasculaire et une hypotension témoigne donc d’une perturbation importante de l’homéostasie.
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Biventricular pacing (BiVP) can optimize cardiac output (CO) in patients after cardiac surgery, so devices that calculate continuous CO from arterial pressure may be a useful tool. We investigated PulseCO for measuring CO during optimization by comparison with aortic flow probe measurement. Seven patients in the Biventricular Pacing After Cardiac Surgery (BiPACS) trial were studied. Before weaning from cardiopulmonary bypass, BiVP was initiated. After bypass, CO was optimized by varying atrioventricular pacing delay, ventricular site, and interventricular pacing delay with a randomized protocol. Continuous CO was measured by PulseCO and aortic flow probe. Reliability was estimated by Fleiss method and agreement assessed by Bland-Altman analysis. Compared with flow probe, PulseCO reliably measured changes in CO (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.90) but underestimated the change (-4% + or - 17%). In contrast, changes in mean arterial pressure did not reflect changes in CO (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.02). Thus, PulseCO can measure continuous CO in open-chest patients after cardiac surgery, whereas underestimating changes occurring across 10-second pacemaker changes. Further studies in the closed chest are indicated.
    ASAIO journal (American Society for Artificial Internal Organs: 1992) 09/2009; 55(6):587-91. DOI:10.1097/MAT.0b013e3181bbafd5 · 1.52 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Response to fluid challenge is often defined as an increase in cardiac index (CI) of more than 10-15%. However, in clinical practice CI values are often not available. We evaluated whether changes in mean arterial pressure (MAP) correlate with changes in CI after fluid challenge in patients with septic shock. This was an observational study in which we reviewed prospectively collected data from 51 septic shock patients in whom complete hemodynamic measurements had been obtained before and after a fluid challenge with 1,000 ml crystalloid (Hartman's solution) or 500 ml colloid (hydroxyethyl starch 6%). CI was measured using thermodilution. Patients were divided into two groups (responders and non-responders) according to their change in CI (responders: %CI >10%) after the fluid challenge. Statistical analysis was performed using a two-way analysis of variance test followed by a Student's t test with adjustment for multiple comparisons. Pearson's correlation and receiver operating characteristic curve analysis were also used. Mean patient age was 67 ± 17 years and mean Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) upon admittance to the intensive care unit was 10 ± 3. In the 25 responders, MAP increased from 69 ± 9 to 77 ± 9 mmHg, pulse pressure (PP) increased from 59 ± 15 to 67 ± 16, and CI increased from 2.8 ± 0.8 to 3.4 ± 0.9 L/min/m(2) (all p < 0.001). There were no significant correlations between the changes in MAP, PP, and CI. Changes in MAP do not reliably track changes in CI after fluid challenge in patients with septic shock and, consequently, should be interpreted carefully when evaluating the response to fluid challenge in such patients.
    Intensive Care Medicine 03/2012; 38(3):422-8. DOI:10.1007/s00134-011-2457-0 · 7.21 Impact Factor
Show more