Article
The utility of the temporalis muscle flap for oropharyngeal, base of tongue, and nasopharyngeal reconstruction.
Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, USA.
Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery (impact factor:
1.72).
04/2005;
132(3):373-80.
DOI:10.1016/j.otohns.2004.09.140
pp.373-80
Source: PubMed
-
Citations (0)
- Cited In (1)
-
Article: Temporalis muscle flap for reconstruction of skull base defects.
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: The temporalis muscle flap (TMF) is a valuable reconstructive technique utilized in a variety of challenging defects. However, its use for repair of skull base defects is less commonly reported. A retrospective chart review was conducted for 35 patients who underwent reconstruction of skull base defects between March 1999 and July 2006 at a tertiary referral hospital. Patients with skull base defects after trauma or extirpative surgery underwent reconstruction with a TMF. The measured outcomes were as follows: defect size/location, need for additional flaps, bone necrosis, hardware exposure, dehiscence, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak, and meningitis. Forty-two patients underwent reconstruction with a TMF, and 35/42 patient records were available for review. No flap failures, 1 transient CSF leak, 3 hardware exposures distant from the temporalis recipient site, and 3 hydroxyapatite cement infections or foreign body reaction were observed. The TMF represents a versatile reconstructive technique employed with minimal morbidity and a low complication rate to repair defects of the skull base.Head & Neck 07/2009; 32(2):199-203. · 2.40 Impact Factor
Data provided are for informational purposes only. Although carefully collected, accuracy cannot be guaranteed.
The impact factor represents a rough estimation of the journal's impact factor and does not reflect the actual
current impact factor.
Publisher conditions are provided by RoMEO. Differing provisions from the publisher's actual policy or licence
agreement may be applicable.
Keywords
12 months
2 bilateral
24 patients
26 temporalis flaps
adjunctive therapy
consecutive series
Donor site aesthetics
flap failure
mean follow-up
minor flap loss
oral intake
primary hydroxyapatite cement cranioplasty
prosthetic rehabilitation
Retrospective chart review
secondary lipotransfer
senior author
temporalis muscle flap
temporalis muscle flap reconstruction
transient frontal nerve paralysis
various defects