A trial to assess the amount of insulin antibodies in diabetic patients by surface plasmon resonance.

Fifth Department of Internal Medicine, Tokyo Medical University (Kasumigaura Hospital), 3-20-1 Chuou Ami, Inashiki, Ibaraki 300-0395.
Internal Medicine (Impact Factor: 0.97). 03/2005; 44(2):100-6. DOI:10.2169/internalmedicine.44.100
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT To measure the amount and affinity of insulin antibodies, we performed a trial to establish a new method for quantitative and qualitative analysis of these antibodies by using surface plasmon resonance (BIAcore system).
Real-time detection of insulin antibody interaction and kinetic analysis were performed using the BIAcore system.
Eight diabetic patients with insulin antibodies and whose fasting total immunoreactive insulin levels were more than 100 microU/ml were selected. The patients with and without recurrent hypoglycemia were classified into hypoglycemic episode-positive or hypoglycemic episode-negative groups, respectively. Seven diabetic patients without insulin antibodies were selected as controls.
In the 8 patients, the concentration of insulin antibodies ranged from 2.91 to 16.3 microg/ml and insulin antibodies were not detected in the control group. The apparent KD (dissociation constant) and kd (the dissociation rate constant) values of the patients were much larger than those seen for the anti-human insulin monoclonal antibody. The KD values were significantly higher in the hypoglycemic episode-positive group than in the hypoglycemic episode-negative group (p<0.05). No significant differences in the concentration, the ka (the association rate constant) and the kd values were noted between the groups.
The data suggests that insulin antibodies of the patients have an apparently lower affinity status in sera as compared with that for the anti-human insulin monoclonal antibody, and dissociate easily from the immune-complex in the sera, especially in cases where there is recurrent hypoglycemia in the patients. Therefore insulin antibody characteristics are one of the causative factors in hypoglycemic episodes.

0 0
  • [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The purification of animal insulin preparations and the use of human recombinant insulin have markedly reduced the incidence, but not completely suppressed, the development of anti-insulin antibodies (IAs). Advances in technologies concerning the mode of delivery of insulin, i.e. continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII), continuous peritoneal insulin infusion (CPII) and more recently inhaled insulin administration, appear to significantly increase circulating levels of immunoglobulin G (IgG) anti-IAs in diabetic patients. However, the increase is usually moderate and mostly transient as compared to previous observations with poorly purified animal insulin preparations. The clinical impact of these circulating anti-IAs remains unclear. Nevertheless, several studies have suggested that antibodies could retard insulin action, leading to a worsening of postprandial hyperglycaemia and/or serve as a carrier, thus leading to unexpected hypoglycaemia. CPII may be associated with more marked and sustained increase in IAs levels, possibly related to the use of an unstable insulin and the formation of immunogenic aggregates of insulin. The possible clinical consequences of these high levels of IAs remain to be evaluated because a low-glucose morning syndrome or severe insulin resistance with ketone bodies production have been reported in some cases. In conclusion, even if CSII and CPII may promote the development of circulating IAs, this increase does not lead to immunological insulin resistance, compared to that previously described with animal non-purified insulin preparations, and seems to have only marginal influence on blood glucose control or complications in most diabetic patients.
    Diabetes/Metabolism Research and Reviews 07/2009; 25(6):491-501. · 2.97 Impact Factor
  • [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: We have developed a sensitive and specific method based on surface plasmon resonance (SPR) for detection of insulin autoantibodies (IAA) in serum samples from individuals at high risk of developing type 1 diabetes (T1D). When measuring trace molecules in undiluted sera with label-free techniques like SPR, non-specific adsorption of matrix proteins to the sensor surface is often a problem, since it causes a signal that masks the analyte response. The developed method is an indirect competitive immunoassay designed to overcome these problems. Today, IAA is mainly measured in radio immunoassays (RIAs), which are time consuming and require radioactively labeled antigen. With our SPR-based immunoassay the overall assay time is reduced by a factor of >100 (4 days to 50min), while sensitivity is maintained at a level comparable to that offered by RIA.
    Biosensors & bioelectronics 08/2008; 24(4):882-7. · 5.43 Impact Factor
  • [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To determine (i) whether insulin preparations produced by three companies induce the same immune responses in insulin-naïve children with type 1 diabetes (T1DM); (ii) if switching from human insulin to rapid-acting insulin analogs influences this immune response; and (iii) if different insulin brands produce different clinical results during the first 2 yr after T1DM diagnosis. Insulin antibodies (IA) were measured for 140 patients aged 1.4-17.6 yr. Regular human insulin, neutral protamine Hagedorn (NPH) human insulin, and rapid-acting insulin analogs (lispro or aspart) taken by the patients were produced by one of three companies: Bioton, Poland (A), Eli Lilly, USA (B) and NovoNordisk, Denmark (C). Positive IA levels were found in 112 patients (80.0%) at baseline and in 137 (97.9%) at 6 and at 24 months after T1DM diagnosis. There was no difference in IA levels among patients taking insulin preparations produced by different companies at 6 months (mean ± SD, A 27.8 ± 15.7%; B 25.3 ± 15.4%; C 24.5 ± 14.2; p = 0.54) or at 24 months (A 25.6 ± 17.8%; B29.6 ± 17.0%; C 26.2 ± 17.0%; p = 0.52); HbA(1c) and daily insulin dose did not differ significantly either. After 24 months, IA levels were similar for those who had used human insulin (mean ± SD, 25.7 ± 17.2%) and for those that had added rapid-acting analogs (28.1 ± 17.3%, p = 0.41). Three brands of insulin preparations did not differ with respect to immunogenicity. Rapid-acting analogs did not increase IA levels in patients previously treated with human insulin only. Patients using insulin preparations of different brands did not differ with respect to daily insulin dose or HbA(1c) .
    Pediatric Diabetes 03/2011; 12(2):78-84. · 2.08 Impact Factor