Analysis of the influence of Tween concentration, inoculum size, assay medium, and reading time on susceptibility testing of Aspergillus spp.

Servicio de Micología, Centro Nacional de Microbiología, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Ctra Majadahonda-Pozuelo, Km 2. 28220 Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain.
Journal of Clinical Microbiology (Impact Factor: 4.23). 04/2005; 43(3):1251-5. DOI: 10.1128/JCM.43.3.1251-1255.2005
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The influence of several test variables on susceptibility testing of Aspergillus spp. was assessed. A collection of 28 clinical isolates was tested against amphotericin B, itraconazole, voriconazole, and terbinafine. Inoculum size (10(4) CFU/ml versus 10(5) CFU/ml) and glucose supplementation (0.2% versus 2%) did not have significant effects on antifungal susceptibility testing results and higher inoculum size and glucose concentration did not falsely elevate MICs. In addition, antifungal susceptibility testing procedure with an inoculum size of 10(5) CFU/ml distinctly differentiated amphotericin B or itraconazole-resistant Aspergillus strains in vivo from the susceptible ones. Time of incubation significantly affected the final values of MICs, showing major increases (two to six twofold dilutions, P < 0.01 by analysis of variance) between MIC readings at 24 and 48 h, but no differences were observed between antifungal susceptibility testing results obtained at 48 h and at 72 h. Significantly higher MICs were uniformly associated with higher concentrations of Tween (P < 0.01), used as a dispersing agent in the preparation of inoculum suspensions. The geometric mean MICs showed increases of between 1.5- and 10-fold when the Tween concentration varied from 0.1% (the geometric means for amphotericin B, itraconazole, voriconazole, and terbinafine were 1.29, 0.69, 1.06, and 0.64 mug/ml, respectively) to 5% (the geometric means for amphotericin B, itraconazole, voriconazole, and terbinafine were 1.97, 5.79, 1.60, and 4.66 mug/ml, respectively). The inhibitory effect of Tween was clearly increased with inoculum sizes of 10(5) CFU/ml and was particularly dramatic for itraconazole, terbinafine, and Aspergillus terreus. The inoculum effect was not observed when the Tween concentration was below 0.5% (P > 0.01).

  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Fungal infections are a diagnostic and therapeutic problem of increasing concern due to the frequency and severity of disseminated infection in immunocompromised patients. Culture-based methods are characteristically slow and have poor sensitivity; hence, other methods, based on the detection of fungus-specific genetic, antigenic and metabolic components are being developed to enable early diagnosis and specific treatment. Moreover, reproducible antifungal susceptibility methods that can be adapted for use in clinical laboratories have been standardized to allow in vitro detection of resistance, which correlates with a less favorable clinical outcome. In this paper we review the main microbiological procedures available for the diagnosis of fungal infections and for antifungal susceptibility testing.
    Enfermedades Infecciosas y Microbiología Clínica 05/2007; 25(5):336–340. · 1.88 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The U.S. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) and the European Committee of Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (AFST-EUCAST) have developed broth microdilution methodologies for testing yeasts and filamentous fungi (molds). The mission of these methodologies is to identify in vitro antifungal resistance, which is accomplished by the use of either clinical breakpoints (CBPs), or to a lesser degree, epidemiologic cutoff values (ECVs). The newly adjusted and species-specific CLSI CBPs for Candida spp. versus fluconazole and voriconazole have ameliorated some of the differences between the two methodologies. In the absence of CBPs for mold testing, CLSI ECVs are available for six Aspergillus species versus the triazoles, caspofungin and amphotericin B. Recently, breakpoints were developed by the EUCAST for certain Aspergillus spp. versus amphotercin B, itraconazole and posaconazole, which to some extent are comparable to ECVs. We summarize these latest accomplishments, which have made possible the harmonization of some susceptibility cutoffs, if not methodologies for some agent/species combinations.
    Current Fungal Infection Reports 7(1).
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The availability of new antifungal agents has multiplied the demand for in vitro antifungal susceptibility testing for Aspergillus spp. The European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) has charged its Antifungal Susceptibility Testing Subcommittee (AFST-EUCAST) with the preparation of new guidelines for in vitro susceptibility testing of antifungals against Aspergillus spp (EUCAST-AST-ASPERGILLUS). This committee has modified the reference method for broth dilution antifungal susceptibility testing of filamentous fungi (M38-A) as follows: (i) RPMI 1640 supplemented with 2% glucose (RPMI 2%G) as assay medium, (ii) inoculum preparation by conidium counting in a haemocytometer and (iii) an inoculum size of 2×10(5)-5×10(5) CFU/ml. The incubation time is about 48 h at 35°C and MIC is read visually. The MIC value is a no-growth visual endpoint. The standard method described herein is intended to provide a valid and economic method for testing the susceptibility to antifungal agents of Aspergillus spp., to identify resistance, and to facilitate an acceptable degree of conformity, e.g. agreement within specified ranges and between laboratories in measuring the susceptibility.
    Medical mycology: official publication of the International Society for Human and Animal Mycology 09/2006; 44(Supplement_1):S319-S325. · 2.26 Impact Factor

Full-text (2 Sources)

Available from
May 22, 2014