Article

Are patients with or at risk of pressure ulcers allocated appropriate prevention measures?

Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Section of Caring Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
International Journal of Nursing Practice (Impact Factor: 0.54). 05/2005; 11(2):58-67. DOI: 10.1111/j.1440-172X.2005.00503.x
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The aims of the study were to investigate the risk for and prevalence of pressure ulcers in different medical care groups, to discover if patients at risk for or with pressure ulcers are allocated appropriate pressure ulcer preventions and to investigate which variables are associated with appropriate pressure ulcer preventions. A cross-sectional survey design was used and followed the methodology developed by the European Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel. A total of 612 patients participated in the study. The prevalence of pressure ulcers was greatest in geriatric care, followed by intensive care, acute care and neurological care. The majority of patients at risk for or with pressure ulcers did not receive appropriate preventative measures, either while they were in bed or in a chair. Significant variables associated with appropriate preventions in bed were intensive care, geriatric care, a low Braden score, a low score in the subscale activity and a long hospital stay.

0 Followers
 · 
160 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The Instituto Nacional de Rehabilitación (Rehabilitation National Institute) (INR) developed a prototype wheelchair cushion (INR cushion) designed to adjust to the anthropometry of the user's ischiogluteal area and prevent pressure ulcer formation while maintaining or promoting functionality. A prospective, longitudinal, descriptive study was conducted from February 2010 to February 2011 to evaluate the effect of using the INR cushion on clinical variables, functionality, and user satisfaction. Sixteen patients were recruited (9 male, 7 female, average age 31.8 [range 22-47] years, average body mass index 25 [range 22-34], average time in a wheelchair 10.1 [range 3-26] years) who met the study protocol inclusion criteria of being pressure ulcer-free for at least 6 months and capable of propulsion and transfer without assistance, chronic spinal cord injury (>2 years), and without chronic-degenerative diseases or cognitive problems. Each participant received the cushion for a 2-month evaluation. Eight clinical variables were assessed: trunk control, posture, spasticity, transfer capacity, comfort, skin reaction, propulsion capacity, and pressure release capacity. The clinical assessment was performed using validated scales and instruments: Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS), Functional Independence Measure™ (FIM), Norton Scale, and assessment of skin reaction. Interface pressures were measured using force sensing array, and participants completed a structured interview to assess user expectation, perceived functionality, perceived quality, and likelihood of recommending the device. Two patients withdrew due to appointment conflicts; of the remaining 14, significant differences between the user's experience with other products and the INR were found with regard to pressure redistribution (P = 0.012); all participants but 1 graded the INR as good in all interview categories. No participants developed a pressure ulcer during the study. The customized cushion was especially functional among patients with incomplete thoracic and cervical injuries, high FIM scores, and moderate levels of activities of daily living. Taller patients (P = 0.01) and patients with higher degrees of spasticity (P = 0.007) were less satisfied with functionality. The results of this study contributed to the redesign process of the cushion. These findings may be useful to establish predictors, both subjective and clinical, for patient utilization of wheelchair cushion use.
    Ostomy/wound management 02/2015; 61(2):26-36. · 1.23 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Pressure ulcer (also known as pressure sore, bedsore, ischemia, decubitus ulcer) is a global challenge for today’s healthcare society. Found in several locations in the human body such as the sacrum, heel, back of the head, shoulder, knee caps, it occurs when soft tissues are under continuous loading and a subject’s mobility is restricted (bedbound/chair bound). Blood flow in soft tissues becomes insufficient leading to tissue necrosis (cell death) and pressure ulcer. The subject’s physiological parameters (age, body mass index) and types of body support surface materials (mattress) are also factors in the formation of pressure ulcer. The economic impacts of these are huge, and the subject’s quality of life is reduced in many ways. There are several methods of detecting and preventing ulceration in human body. Detection depends on assessing local pressure on tissue and prevention on scales of risk used to assess a subject prior to admission. There are also various types of mattresses (air cushioned/liquid filled/foam) available to prevent ulceration. But, despite this work, pressure ulcers remain common.This article reviews the aetiology, cost, detection and prevention of these ulcers.
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: 1. Bakgrund, problembeskrivning och syfte (Define) 1.1 Bakgrund Patienter som drabbas av trycksår upplever stort obehag, smärta och besvikelse över sin situation. Vårdtiden förlängs och kostnaderna ökar. För att klarlägga omfattningen av trycksår har ett flertal punktprevalensstudier genomförts på sjukhus i Sverige under de senaste tio åren. Resultatet visar i de flesta fall trycksårsprevalens mellan 10-20% (1,2,3,4). Problemet har uppmärksammats och för att öka patientsäkerheten ingår trycksår som ett av sex prioriterade områden i det patientsäkerhetsarbete som drivs av SKL, och regioner. Patientsäkerhet är i dag ett prioriterat område både nationellt och på SkaS. 1.2 Problemområde På Kärnsjukhuset i Skövde finns en vårdavdelning med uppdrag att vårda patienter med slutenvårdskrävande trycksår. Man upplever inte att problemet minskar och antalet vårdtillfällen med huvuddiagnos trycksår de två senaste åren (06-07) är oförändrat. Kärnsjukhuset hade 2007 sexton vårdtillfällen med huvuddiagnos trycksår, till en kostnad av 1 469 166 kr (endast direkt vårdplatskostnad). Antalet tillfällen där trycksår registrerats som bidiagnos var större men i båda fallen är troligen mörkertalet stort. De direkt sårrelaterade kostnaderna är avsevärda. De 44 sår som registrerade som bidiagnos 2007 tar ca 26 arbetstimmar per dag att lägga om (30 min/sår) och kostar ca 2200 kr/dag i materialkostnad vid en mindre standardomläggning. Enligt beräkningar från Landstinget i Jönköping är den totala kostnaden för för vård och behandling av trycksårspatienter per år 53 000 000 kronor (5) För att få en uppfattning om hur stort problemet är på KSS som helhet och om specifika rotorsaker kunde urskiljas och åtgärdas beslutades i januari -08 att utforma ett BlackBelt projekt med Six Sigma metodik kring trycksår. 1.3 Syfte och metod Projektets syfte är en minskad trycksårsförekomst samt snabbare läkning av befintliga trycksår på KSS. Arbetet har utförts enligt Six Sigma konceptet med DMAICL metodik.