Can birds be ammonotelic? Nitrogen balance and excretion in two frugivores

Department of Biology, Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa 32000, Israel.
Journal of Experimental Biology (Impact Factor: 2.9). 04/2005; 208(Pt 6):1025-34. DOI: 10.1242/jeb.01495
Source: PubMed


We measured minimal nitrogen requirements (MNR), total endogenous nitrogen loss (TENL) and the effect of protein and water intake on the nitrogenous waste composition in two frugivorous bird species: yellow-vented bulbuls Pycnonotus xanthopygos and Tristram's grackles Onychognathus tristrami. The nitrogen requirements of both species were much lower than expected for their body mass. The two species differed in the composition of the nitrogenous waste that they produced. The grackles were uricotelic, and the chemical composition of their nitrogenous waste products was relatively independent of water and protein intake. In contrast, the bulbuls were 'apparently ammonotelic'. Their ammonotely was related to low protein intake and high water flux, and was the result of post-renal urine modification. We suggest two non-exclusive mechanisms for the post-renal modification of urine in these birds: bacterial catabolism of uric acid and reabsorption of uric acid in the hindgut. As uric acid functions both as a nitrogenous waste product and as an antioxidant, birds might benefit from its reabsorption.

Download full-text


Available from: Zeev Arad,
  • Source
    • "Ardea Herodias Great Blue Heron 2300 2930 753.0 C Bennett and Hart (1993) Manacus vitellinus Golden-collared Manakin 18.0 18.7 9.9 F Worthington (1989) Pipra mentalis Red-capped manakin 14.0 17.2 8.7 F Worthington (1989) Phylidonyris novaehollandiae New Holland Honeyeater 20 5.0 3.2 N Paton (1982) Bomycilla cedrorum Cedar Waxwing 34.5 21.2 5.5 F Witmer (1998) Catharus guttatus Hermit Thrush 31.0 53.1 22.8 O Langlois and McWilliams (2010) Cathararus mustelina Wood Thrush 47.1 92.1 26.1 O Witmer (1998) Turdus migratorius American Robin 65.7 62.8 25.5 O Witmer (1998) Onychognathus tristrami Tristram's grackle 115 24.7 19.9 F Tsahar et al. (2005b) "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Successful ostrich farming requires knowledge of the nutritional needs of the birds. While much information is available on the nutritional value of various feed ingredients fed to ostriches, there is little known about their specific nutrient requirements. In this study, we measured the maintenance nitrogen requirements (MNR) of ostriches by nitrogen balance. We predict, based on the previous analysis of nitrogen requirements of various species of birds, that ostriches would have a MNR of 13.6-19.1 g N/day and a total endogenous nitrogen loss (TENL) of 2.8-5.1 g N/day. Three adult female ostriches were fed five pelleted diets containing 0.6-2.3% N [4-14.6% crude protein (CP)], 17.5 kJ/g gross energy (11.4 kJ/g ME) and 30% neutral detergent fibre. Each dietary trial consisted of a 10-day adaptation period, followed by a 5-day total excreta collection period. Body mass (109 ± 3 kg) and metabolizable energy intake (20.5 ± 0.7 MJ/day) were unaffected by dietary nitrogen levels. After correcting for excreta nitrogen losses during drying, MNR was calculated to be 481 mg N/kg(0.75) /day or 16.2 g N/day (100 g CP/day), and TENL as 310 mg N/kg(0.75) /day or 10.5 g N/day. Failure to correct for the 10.9 ± 4.1% average N losses during drying would underpredict the 'true' MNR by 35% and TENL by 46%. Our estimate for MNR of ostriches predicts a dietary requirement of 6.7% protein. Our estimate of TENL was nearly twice that predicted, possibly reflecting the high fibre content of their diet.
    J Anim Physiol a Anim Nutr 08/2012; 96(4):600-9. DOI:10.1111/j.1439-0396.2011.01184.x · 1.41 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "After consuming the first diet for 75 days, birds were divided randomly into three groups; each bird received a diet containing a different amount of casein protein (5 birds – low protein, 4 birds – medium protein, 4 birds – high protein; Table·1). Our diets fully satisfied the bird's nitrogen requirements (Tsahar et al., 2005). Again, we used the same batch of each ingredient during the experiment; each was mixed prior the experiments so that the diet throughout the experiment would have the same isotopic signature. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The rate at which an animal's tissues incorporate the isotopic composition of food determines the time window during which ecologists can discern diet changes. We investigated the effect of protein content in the diet on the incorporation rate of (15)N into the plasma proteins and blood cells of Yellow-vented bulbuls (Pycnonotus xanthopygos). Using model comparison analyses, we found that one-compartment models described incorporation data better than two-compartment models. Dietary protein content had a significant effect on the residence time of (15)N in plasma proteins and blood cells. The diet with the highest protein content led to a (15)N retention time of 21 and 5 days for cells and plasma, respectively. In contrast, average (15)N retention time in the cells and plasma of birds fed on the diet with the lowest protein was 31 and 7 days, respectively. The isotopic discrimination factor Delta(15)N=delta(15)N(tissues)-delta(15)N(diet) was also dependent on dietary protein content, and was lowest in birds fed the diet with the highest protein content. Blood, plasma and excreta were enriched in (15)N relative to diet. In contrast, ureteral urine was either significantly depleted of (15)N in birds fed the diet with the lowest protein content or did not differ in delta(15)N from the diets with the intermediate and high protein content. Thus, isotopic incorporation rates and tissue-to-diet discrimination factors cannot be considered fixed, as they depend on diet composition.
    Journal of Experimental Biology 03/2008; 211(Pt 3):459-65. DOI:10.1242/jeb.013219 · 2.90 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "Such discrepancy between N input as predicted by intake or defaecation models is not restricted to herbivorous waterfowl, but also occurred in similar calculations for carnivorous birds (Hahn, Bauer & Klaassen, 2007). A potential explanation is the excretion of a certain portion of N in the form of ammonia (Tsahar et al., 2005). DM predictions will underestimate total N deposition because ammonia will be lost before collection and/or if excrements are simply air-or oven-dried before N measurements. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: 1. Waterbirds are considered to import large quantities of nutrients to freshwater bodies but quantification of these loadings remains problematic. We developed two general models to calculate such allochthonous nutrient inputs considering food intake, foraging behaviour and digestive performance of waterbirds feeding in terrestrial habitats: an intake model (IM), mainly based on an allometric relationship for energy requirements and a dropping model (DM), based on allometric relationships for defaecation. 2. Reviewed data of nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) content of herbivorous food varied according to diet type (foliage, seeds and roots), season and fertilization. For model parameterization average foliage diet contained 38.20 mg N g−1 and 3.21 mg P g−1 (dry weight), whereas mean faeces composition was 45.02 mg N g−1 and 6.18 mg P g−1. 3. Daily allochthonous nutrient input increased with body mass ranging from 0.29 g N and 0.03 g P in teals Anas crecca to 5.69 g N and 0.57 g P in mute swans Cygnus olor. Results from IM differed from those of DM from ducks to swans by 63–108% for N and by −4 to 23% for P. Model uncertainty was lowest for the IM and mainly caused by variation in estimates of food retention time (RT). In DM food RT and dropping mass determined model uncertainty in similar extent. 4. Exemplarily applying the models to Dutch wetlands resulted in mean annual contribution of herbivorous waterbirds to allochthonous nutrient loading of 382.8 ± 167.1 tonnes N a−1and 34.7 ± 2.3 tonnes P a−1, respectively, which corresponds to annual surface-water loadings of 1.07 kg N ha−1 and 0.10 kg P ha−1. 5. There was a distinct seasonal pattern with peak loadings in January, when bird abundances were highest. Lowest inputs were in August, when bird abundance and nutrient content in food was low and birds foraged less in terrestrial habitats. Three-quarters of all nutrient input was contributed by greater white-fronted goose Anser albifrons, greylag goose Anser anser, wigeon Anas penelope and barnacle goose Branta leucopsis alone. 6. We provide general, easy to use calculation methods for the estimation of allochthonous nutrient inputs by waterbirds, which are applicable to a range of waterbird species, a variety of potential diets and feeding behaviours, and across spatial scales. Such tools may greatly assist in the planning and execution of management actions for wetland nutrient budgets.
    Freshwater Biology 01/2008; 53(1):181-193. DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2427.2007.01881.x · 2.74 Impact Factor
Show more