Fibroepithelial polyp of the lower urinary tract in adults.

Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD 21231, USA.
American Journal of Surgical Pathology (Impact Factor: 4.59). 05/2005; 29(4):460-6. DOI: 10.1097/01.pas.0000155153.64360.1a
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Fibroepithelial polyps of the urinary tract are rare with most cases reported in children.
We report the clinicopathologic features of 12 fibroepithelial polyps of the lower urinary tract in adults.
There were 9 males, 2 females, and 1 patient where the gender was unknown (median age, 44 years; range, 17-70 years).
Chief clinical symptoms were hematuria, urinary urgency, and hesitancy. Five patients were asymptomatic, where the lesions were discovered incidentally. Most lesions were located near the verumontanum or the bladder neck. Ten patients were treated by transurethral resection. Of the 10 patients with follow-up information, none showed recurrence (mean, 20 months; median, 17 months). Histologically, all of the fibroepithelial polyps were lined by normal-appearing urothelium, with in one lesion the additional finding of a columnar epithelial lining. There were three overall architectural patterns seen within fibroepithelial polyps. The most common pattern (Pattern 1) seen in 5 cases consisted of a polypoid mass with club-like projections resembling a cloverleaf with florid cystitis cystica et glandularis of the nonintestinal type in the stalk. The second pattern (Pattern 2) seen in 4 cases consisted of a papillary tumor composed of numerous small, rounded fibrovascular cores containing dense fibrous tissue. The last morphologic pattern (Pattern 3) consisted of a polypoid lesion with secondary tall finger-like projections, which was seen in 3 cases. All lesions lacked prominent edema and inflammation seen in polypoid cystitis. Fibroepithelial polyps contained broader stalks with dense fibrous tissue, in contrast to the thin delicate loose fibroconnective tissue seen in the stalk of papillomas. One lesion contained atypical degenerative-appearing stromal cells.
Although fibroepithelial polyps have been considered to be congenital, we think that some of these polyps could develop after birth because all of our patients first showed clinical symptoms in adulthood. Because fibroepithelial polyps in adults are rare, some of these cases can be misdiagnosed as urothelial neoplasms or reactive conditions. Recognition of the precise histologic features of fibroepithelial polyp can facilitate its correct diagnosis.


Available from: Toyonori Tsuzuki, Jan 07, 2014
1 Follower
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Fibroepithelial polyps are rare benign lesions which can mimic malignant disease symptomatically and radiologically. They should form part of the differential diagnosis in patients presenting with frank haematuria but they can present a diagnostic dilemma for clinicians. This is a case of a 30-year-old female who initially presented with a small palpable urethral lump, thought to be a urethral caruncle by her general practitioner, obstructive voiding and intermittent frank painless haematuria. A rigid cystoscopy identified a polypoid lesion protruding out of the left ureteric orifice. This was resected and pathology showed it to be a fibroepithelial polyp. A post-operative computerized tomography scan showed no hydronephrosis on either side and no lymphadenopathy was identified but the distal left ureter could not be visualised. Further resection with a flexible ureteroscopy confirmed the presence of a benign fibroepithelial polyp and the stalk remnant was ablated with a laser. Fibroepithelial polyps mimic malignant disease symptomatically and radiologically and need to be considered in the differential diagnosis of frank haematuria. © The Author(s) 2014 Reprints and permissions:
    Scottish medical journal 12/2014; 60(1). DOI:10.1177/0036933014563891 · 0.54 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Aim: Polyps of the male posterior urethra are rare and usually benign congenital lesions. We report a case of an 8-year-old boy who presented with recurrent urine retention caused by urethral polyp. Case report: At his first admittance to the hospital, the 8-year-old boy presented with urine retention. The performed urethrocystoscopy and cystourethrography were not diagnostic. His condition spontaneously improved, micturition was normal and the boy was discharged. Two years later he presented with recurrent urine retention, and ultrasonography (US) revealed a polypoid mass at the bladder base while cystourethrogram showed a filling defect. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) revealed the localization of urethral polyp projecting from verumontanum into the bladder cavity. After successful transurethral resection, histological analysis showed fibroepithelial polyp indicating congenital origin. Discussion: Urethral polyps are very rare and their etiology is controversial. The presenting symptoms are intermittent urine retention, incomplete bladder emptying, hematuria and urinary infection. Rarely, they are asymptomatic. The diagnosis is usually made by US and voiding cystourethrogram (VCUG). Urethrocystoscopy is always diagnostic. The role of MRI is to define the surgical approach to the polypoid lesion. Conclusions: The diagnosis of urethral polyp can be made by US, VCUG or MRI but urethrocystoscopy still has a major diagnostic and therapeutic value, especially in boys presenting with urine retention. Sažetak. Cilj: Polipi stražnje uretre u muške djece rijetke su i obično benigne kongenitalne lezije. U ovom radu prikazat ćemo slučaj osmogodišnjeg dječaka koji je po drugi put primljen u bolnicu zbog akutne retencije urina (ARU) uzrokovane polipom stražnje uretre. Prikaz slučaja: Kod prvog primitka dječaka u bolnicu, zbog ARU-a, učinjene su uretrocistoskopija i cistouretrografija. No, navedenim pretragama nije se uspio pronaći uzrok dječakovim tegobama. Njegovo mokrenje postupno se normaliziralo i dječak je otpušten kući. Dvije godine kasnije, kada je ponovno primljen zbog ARU-a, ultrazvukom (UZ) je uočena polipoidna tvorba na bazi mjehura i defekt punjenja na mikcijskoj cistouretrografiji (MCUG). Magnetskom rezonancijom (MR) točno se definiralo mjesto na kojem se nalazi polip; s ishodištem u verumontanumu i protruzijom u mokraćni mjehur, gdje slobodno prominira. Nakon transuretralne resekcije učinjena je patohistološka analiza kojom je potvrđen fibroepitelni polip koji je vrlo vjerojatno kongenitalan. Rasprava: Uretralni polipi izuzetno su rijetki, a njihova etiologija je stalna tema rasprave. Prezentirajući simptomi su intermitentna retencija urina, nepotpuno pražnjenje mjehura, hematurija i urinarna infekcija. Mogu biti i asimptomatski, ali rijetko. Dijagnoza se obično postavlja s UZ-om i MCUG-om. MR definira kirurški pristup polipoznoj tvorbi, dok se uretrocistoskopijom postavlja definitivna dijagnoza. Zaključci: Dijagnoza uretralnog polipa može se postaviti sa UZ, MCUG i MR, ali uretrocistoskopija ima važnu ulogu, kako dijagnostičku, tako i terapijsku.
  • Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology 09/2008; 59(2 Suppl 1):S37-9. DOI:10.1016/j.jaad.2007.08.017 · 5.00 Impact Factor