Sequences from the low density lipoprotein receptor-related protein (LRP) cytoplasmic domain enhance amyloid beta protein production via the beta-secretase pathway without altering amyloid precursor protein/LRP nuclear signaling
ABSTRACT Increasing evidence suggests that the low density lipoprotein receptor-related protein (LRP) affects the processing of amyloid precursor protein (APP) and amyloid beta (Abeta) protein production as well as mediates the clearance of Abeta from the brain. Recent studies indicate that the cytoplasmic domain of LRP is critical for this modulation of APP processing requiring perhaps a complex between APP, the adaptor protein FE65, and LRP. In this study, we expressed a small LRP domain consisting of the C-terminal 97 amino acids of the cytoplasmic domain, or LRP-soluble tail (LRP-ST), in CHO cells to test the hypothesis that the APP.LRP complex can be disrupted. We anticipated that LRP-ST would inhibit the normal interaction between LRP and APP and therefore perturb APP processing to resemble a LRP-deficient state. Surprisingly, CHO cells expressing LRP-ST demonstrated an increase in both sAPP secretion and Abeta production compared with control CHO cells in a manner reminiscent of the cellular effects of the APP "Swedish mutation." The increase in sAPP secretion consisted mainly of sAPPbeta, consistent with the increase in Abeta release. Further, this effect is LRP-independent, as the same alterations remained when LRP-ST was expressed in LRP-deficient cells but not when the construct was membrane-anchored. Finally, deletion experiments suggested that the last 50 amino acid residues of LRP-ST contain the important domain for altering APP processing and Abeta production. These observations indicate that there are cellular pathways that may suppress Abeta generation but that can be altered to facilitate Abeta production.
- SourceAvailable from: sciencedirect.com[Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Neuronal Fe65 is a central adapter for the intracellular protein network of Alzheimer's disease related amyloid precursor protein (APP). It contains a unique tandem array of phosphotyrosine-binding (PTB) domains that recognize NPXY internalization motifs present in the intracellular domains of APP (AICD) and the low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein LRP1 (LICD). The ternary APP/Fe65/LRP1 complex is an important mediator of APP processing and affects β-amyloid peptide production. Here we dissect by biochemical and biophysical methods the direct interactions within the ternary complex and reveal a phosphorylation-dependent insulin receptor substrate (IRS-) like interaction of the distal NPVY(4507) motif of LICD with Fe65-PTB1.FEBS letters 10/2011; 585(20):3229-35. DOI:10.1016/j.febslet.2011.09.028 · 3.34 Impact Factor
- [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Increasing evidence has implicated megalin, a low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein, in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer's disease (AD). In the brain, megalin is expressed in brain capillaries, ependymal cells and choroid plexus, where it participates in the clearance of brain amyloid β-peptide (Aβ) complex. Recently, megalin has also been detected in oligodendrocytes and astrocytes. In this study we demonstrate that megalin is widely distributed in neurons throughout the brain. Additionally, given that FE65 mediates the interaction between the low density lipoprotein receptor-related protein-1 and the amyloid precursor protein (APP) to modulate the rate of APP internalization from the cell surface, we hypothesize that megalin could also interact with APP in neurons. Our results confirm that megalin interacts with APP and FE65, suggesting that these three proteins form a tripartite complex. Moreover, our findings imply that megalin may participate in neurite branching. Taken together, these results indicate that megalin has an important role in Aβ-mediated neurotoxicity, and therefore may be involved in the neurodegenerative processes that occur in AD.Molecular and Cellular Neuroscience 11/2010; 45(3):306-15. DOI:10.1016/j.mcn.2010.07.005 · 3.73 Impact Factor