Ruthenium(II)-catalyzed hydrogenation of carbon dioxide to formic acid. Theoretical study of real catalyst, ligand effects, and solvation effects.

Department of Molecular Engineering, Graduate School of Engineering, Kyoto University, Nishikyo-ku, Kyoto 615-8510, Japan.
Journal of the American Chemical Society (Impact Factor: 11.44). 04/2005; 127(11):4021-32. DOI: 10.1021/ja043697n
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Ruthenium-catalyzed hydrogenation of carbon dioxide to formic acid was theoretically investigated with DFT and MP4(SDQ) methods, where a real catalyst, cis-Ru(H)2(PMe3)3, was employed in calculations and compared with a model catalyst, cis-Ru(H)2(PH3)3. Significant differences between the real and model systems are observed in CO2 insertion into the Ru(II)-H bond, isomerization of a ruthenium(II) eta1-formate intermediate, and metathesis of the eta1-formate intermediate with a dihydrogen molecule. All these reactions more easily occur in the real system than in the model system. The differences are interpreted in terms that PMe3 is more donating than PH3 and the trans-influence of PMe3 is stronger than that of PH3. The rate-determining step is the CO2 insertion into the Ru(II)-H bond. Its deltaG(o++) value is 16.8 (6.8) kcal/mol, where the value without parentheses is calculated with the MP4(SDQ) method and that in parentheses is calculated with the DFT method. Because this insertion is considerably endothermic, the coordination of the dihydrogen molecule with the ruthenium(II)-eta1-formate intermediate must necessarily occur to suppress the deinsertion. This means that the reaction rate increases with increase in the pressure of dihydrogen molecule, which is consistent with the experimental results. Solvent effects were investigated with the DPCM method. The activation barrier and reaction energy of the CO2 insertion reaction moderately decrease in the order gas phase > n-heptane > THF, while the activation barrier of the metathesis considerably increases in the order gas phase < n-heptane < THF. Thus, a polar solvent should be used because the insertion reaction is the rate-determining step.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: A new water-soluble ruthenium hydride complex [Ru(H)(bpy)2(PTA)]PF6 (bpy = 2,2'-bipyridine, PTA = 1,3,5-triaza-7-phosphaadamantane) (1a) was prepared. 1a reacted with CO2 and CS2 to give the corresponding formate and dithioformate complexes, respectively. Both the insertions of CO2 and CS2 into the Ru-H bond of 1a followed second-order kinetics. The second-order rate constant (k2) of CO2 insertion reaction varied from (9.40 ± 0.41) × 10(-4) M(-1) s(-1) in acetone to (1.13 ± 0.08) × 10(-1) M(-1) s(-1) in methanol; moreover, the ln(k2) is in good linear relationship with the acceptor number (AN) of the solvent used. Although, the k2 of CS2 insertion reaction ranged from (3.43 ± 0.10) M(-1) s(-1) in methanol to (24.0 ± 0.5) M(-1) s(-1) in N,N-dimethylformamide, which is 1000 times faster than CO2 insertion. Generally, the k2 of CS2 insertion increased with the static dielectric constant (Ds) of the reaction medium investigated. For comparison purposes, we further investigated the reactivity of [Ru(H)(bpy)2(PPh3)]PF6 (PPh3 = triphenylphosphine) (1b) with CO2 and CS2. 1b reacted with CO2 slowly in the methanol with a k2 of (1.46 ± 0.09) × 10(-3) M(-1) s(-1), yielding a formate complex [Ru(η(1)-OC(H)═O)(bpy)2(PPh3)]PF6 (2b). The reaction of 1b with CS2 is 1000 times faster than that of CO2. The structures of 1a, 1b, and 2b were determined by X-ray crystallographic analysis.
    Inorganic Chemistry 08/2014; · 4.79 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Water-soluble ruthenium m-triphenylphosphinetrisulfonate (TPPTS) complexes are excellent catalysts for formic acid dehydrogenation. Interestingly, the choice of metal catalyst precursor has a direct influence on initial activities. The reaction with hexaaquaruthenium(II) tosylate directly yields bisphosphine complexes in the presence of TPPTS and formic acid, whereas trisphosphine adducts are involved if the reaction starts with ruthenium(III) chloride. We present the results of a series of manometric and spectroscopic experiments that reveal the true nature of these highly active species, and subsequently propose a rational “fast” cycle mechanism explaining this peculiar activity profile.
    ChemCatChem 09/2014; · 5.18 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The reaction mechanism of CO2 hydrogenation by pyridine-based Ru-PNP catalyst in the presence of DBU base promoter was studied by means of density functional theory calculations. Three alternative reaction channels promoted by the complexes potentially present under the reaction conditions, namely the dearomatized complex 2 and the products of cooperative CO2 (3) and H2 (4) addition, were analysed. It is shown that the bis-hydrido Ru-PNP complex 4 provides the unique lowest-energy reaction path involving a direct effectively barrierless hydrogenolysis of the polarized complex 5*. The reaction rate in this case is controlled by the CO2 activation by Ru-H that proceeds with a very low barrier of ca. 20 kJ mol-1. The catalytic reaction can be hampered by the formation of a stable formato-complex 5. In this case, the rate is controlled by the H2 insertion into the Ru-OCHO coordination bond, for which a barrier of 65 kJ mol-1 is predicted. The DFT calculations suggest that the preference for the particular route can be controlled by varying the partial pressure of H2 in the reaction mixture. Under H2-rich conditions, the former more facile catalytic path should be preferred. Dedicated kinetic experiments verify these theoretical predictions. The apparent activation energies measured at different H2/CO2 molar ratios are in a perfect agreement with the calculated values. Ru-PNP is a highly active CO2 hydrogenation catalyst allowing reaching turnover frequencies in the order of 106 h-1 at elevated temperatures. Moreover, a minor temperature dependency of the reaction rate attainable in excess H2 points to the possibility of efficient CO2 hydrogenation at near-ambient temperatures.
    Catalysis Science & Technology 01/2014; · 4.76 Impact Factor