[Attitude towards psychotherapy in the Russian population and in the population with a Russian/Soviet cultural background in Germany. A pilot study].

Institut für Psychologie, Technische Universität Braunschweig.
Der Nervenarzt (Impact Factor: 0.8). 02/2006; 77(1):64-72. DOI:10.1007/s00115-005-1889-6
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT We assumed that persons with a Russian/Soviet cultural background have a more skeptical attitude towards psychotherapy than persons with a German background because of the poor distribution of psychotherapy and the knowledge about this kind of treatment in Russia.
We compared the views of Russian probands (n=40), Russian migrants living in Germany (n=65) and German probands (n=70) with the "Questionnaire on Attitudes towards Psychotherapeutic Treatment" (QAPT). For the study of the Russian probands we translated the questionnaire into the Russian language.
The psychometric examination predominantly suggests the quality of the Russian version of the QAPT. Russian probands showed a more skeptical attitude towards psychotherapy compared to the German probands. The migrants had a tendentially more negative attitude than the Germans and a more positive attitude than the Russians. However, we could not determine any differences concerning the anticipated social acceptance regarding participation in psychotherapy.
The results suggest the relevance of culture-specific factors in psychotherapy and an increased need for information of persons with a Russian/Soviet cultural background about psychotherapy.

0 0
  • [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Citizens of Novosibirsk were questioned regarding their ideas about schizophrenia and depressive disorders, with one of the main concerns being a comparison with the ideas and attitudes of the German population. In 2002, a representative survey (N = 745) was conducted among the adult population of Novosibirsk, using a fully structured interview that has been used in previous surveys in Germany. Symptoms of schizophrenia were more frequently identified as an indication of mental disorder than were depressive symptoms. Psychosocial stress and biological influences were similarly frequently seen as the cause of schizophrenia, with the former prevailing among the respondents in the case of depressive symptoms. Psychotherapy was most frequently recommended as a treatment measure, also for schizophrenia. Supposing that no treatment measures will be taken, respondents assessed the prognosis for both mental disorders negatively. Conversely, interviewees gave a positive treatment prognosis. Respondents from Germany and Novosibirsk showed similar beliefs, especially as regards the importance of biological influences and psychosocial stress and the assessment of psychotherapy as compared to psychopharmacology. However, German and Russian respondents also held differing views: a comparatively strong tendency of the Russian population to consider mental disorders as self-inflicted - an important finding that could shape future anti-stigma programs.
    Psychiatrische Praxis 04/2004; 31(2):90-5. · 1.64 Impact Factor
  • [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: RESEARCH PROBLEM: The readiness to use psychiatric services is, among other things, determined by the image of psychiatry held by the public. A representative survey of the adult population in the new German Länder was carried out, part of which was the assessment of what people associated with the term "psychiatry" and of their idea of a psychiatric hospital. Psychiatric hospitals, in particular the large-scale mental institutions, shape the dominant image of psychiatry among the public. In this, the custodial or repressive character of psychiatry is the central constituent of the public's representation. The chances that a positive change of the public's ideas toward more informed images and attitudes might be achieved appear to be slim as long large scale institutions, though with a new appearance, continue to exist.
    Psychiatrische Praxis 11/2000; 27(7):327-9. · 1.64 Impact Factor
  • [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Within the German research network on depression, the Nuremberg Alliance against Depression aims at informing the public about depressive illness and preventing suicidality by carrying out a city-wide information campaign. Before the prevention program started, public attitudes and knowledge had been assessed in a public opinion survey in Nuremberg and in a control region. A total of 1426 randomly chosen inhabitants of Nuremberg and Würzburg completed a computer-assisted telephone interview during November and December 2000. They were asked about their knowledge and attitudes towards symptoms, causes, and treatment of depression. No relevant differences between Nuremberg and Würzburg were found. Depression is regarded as a serious illness. People seemed to be more knowledgeable as compared to the results of earlier surveys, but there are still important information deficits. This is especially true for males over 60, who show unfavorable attitudes. Eighty percent of the population consider antidepressants to be addictive, and 69% were convinced that the use of antidepressants would lead to personality changes. Future information campaigns should aim at describing depression as an often chronic disease similar to hypertonia or diabetes. Public knowledge about antidepressants must be improved.
    Der Nervenarzt 08/2002; 73(7):659-64. · 0.80 Impact Factor