Article

TERMTrial--terminology-based documentation systems for cooperative clinical trials.

University of Heidelberg, Institute for Medical Biometry and Informatics, Department of Medical Informatics, Heidelberg, Germany.
Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine (impact factor: 1.52). 05/2005; 78(1):11-24. DOI:10.1016/j.cmpb.2004.11.001 pp.11-24
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Within cooperative groups of multi-center clinical trials a standardized documentation is a prerequisite for communication and sharing of data. Standardizing documentation systems means standardizing the underlying terminology. The management and consistent application of terminology systems is a difficult and fault-prone task, which should be supported by appropriate software tools. Today, documentation systems for clinical trials are often implemented as so-called Remote-Data-Entry-Systems (RDE-systems). Although there are many commercial systems, which support the development of RDE-systems there is none offering a comprehensive terminological support. Therefore, we developed the software system TERMTrial which consists of a component for the definition and management of terminology systems for cooperative groups of clinical trials and two components for the terminology-based automatic generation of trial databases and terminology-based interactive design of electronic case report forms (eCRFs). TERMTrial combines the advantages of remote data entry with a comprehensive terminological control.

0 0
 · 
0 Bookmarks
 · 
27 Views
  • Source
    Article: Can openEHR Archetypes Empower Multi-Centre Clinical Research?
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The Electronic Health Record is of utmost importance to enable the provision of high-quality collaborative care; one prominent development is openEHR. On the other hand, a systematic approach to support the use of routine data for multi-centre clinical research is becoming increasingly important. One example of this is the extensible architecture for using routine data for additional purposes (eardap) which features comprehensive terminological support. However, as experiences in various medical fields have shown, the terminology-based approach is limited to specialized fields and it is argued that a comprehensive terminology is simply too complex and too difficult to maintain. As the openEHR archetype approach does not rely heavily on big standardized terminologies, it offers more flexibility during standardisation of clinical concepts and overcome the shortcomings of terminology-focused approaches. It is unknown, however, how far the more generic openEHR approach can also enable re-use of routinely collected data for clinical research purposes - the use case for which eardap was designed. We therefore explored the feasibility of using the openEHR approach to support multi-centre research in comparison to eardap. Generally speaking, our results show that both eardap and openEHR are suitable to enable the use of routine data for multi-centre clinical research. As the openEHR approach also ensures open, future-proof Electronic Health Records, we conclude that it is highly desirable that multi-centre clinical trials adopt openEHR.
    Studies in health technology and informatics 02/2005; 116:971-6.

Keywords

advantages
 
appropriate software tools
 
clinical trials
 
comprehensive terminological control
 
cooperative groups
 
electronic case report forms
 
multi-center clinical trials
 
RDE-systems
 
remote data entry
 
so-called Remote-Data-Entry-Systems
 
software system TERMTrial
 
standardized documentation
 
standardizing
 
Standardizing documentation systems
 
terminology systems
 
terminology-based automatic generation
 
terminology-based interactive design
 
TERMTrial
 
trial databases
 
underlying terminology
 

A Merzweiler