Transplantation ethics from the Islamic point of view

Center for Study and Research of Medical Ethics, Ministry of Health and Medical Education, I.R. Iran.
Medical science monitor: international medical journal of experimental and clinical research (Impact Factor: 1.43). 05/2005; 11(4):RA105-9.
Source: PubMed


Organ transplantation has been transformed from an experimental procedure at Western academic centers to an increasingly common procedure in private and public hospitals throughout the world. Attendant with advancements in organ harvesting, preservation, and transplantation come moral issues. Islam is a holistic religion that takes into account social affairs of man as well as spiritual ones. Islam has a long history of ethics literature including the subgenre of medical ethics. Historical considerations are discussed as to why Muslim thinkers were late to consider contemporary medical issues such as organ donation. Islam respects life and values the needs of the living over the dead, thus allowing organ donation to be considered in certain circumstances. The sources of Islamic law are discussed in brief in order for non-Muslims to appreciate how the parameters of organ transplantation are derived. The Islamic viewpoint, both Shiite and Sunni, is examined in relation to organ donation and its various sources. The advantages and disadvantages of brain dead and cadaveric donation is reviewed with technical and ethical considerations. The Islamic concept of brain death, informed and proxy consent are also discussed. We discuss the concept of rewarded donation as a way to alleviate the current shortage of organs available for transplantation and consider secular and religious support for such a program. Suggestions are made for greater discussion and exchange of ideas between secular and religious thinkers in the Islamic world and between the Islamic world and secular Western countries.

Download full-text


Available from: Kamyar Hedayat,
178 Reads
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Statements on issues in biomedical ethics, purporting to represent international interests, have been put forth by numerous groups. Most of these groups are composed of thinkers in the tradition of European secularism, and do not take into account the values of other ethical systems. One fifth of the world's population is accounted for by Islam, which is a universal religion, with more than 1400 years of scholarship. Although many values are held in common by secular ethical systems and Islam, their inferences are different. The question, "Is it possible to derive a truly universal declaration of biomedical ethics?" is discussed here by examining the value and extent of personal autonomy in Western and Islamic biomedical ethical constructs. These constructs are then tested vis-à-vis the issue of abortion. It is concluded that having a universal declaration of biomedical ethics in practice is not possible, although there are many conceptual similarities and agreements between secular and Islamic value systems, unless a radical paradigm shift occurs in segments of the world's deliberative bodies. The appellation "universal" should not be used on deliberative statements unless the ethical values of all major schools of thought are satisfied.
    Journal of Medical Ethics 02/2007; 33(1):17-20. DOI:10.1136/jme.2006.016170 · 1.51 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: There are more than 8 million refugees worldwide with the Middle East bearing the brunt. Socioeconomic factors are the major obstacles that refugees encounter when seeking health care in the host country. It, therefore, comes as no surprise that refugees are denied equal opportunities for one of the most sophisticated and expensive medical procedures in the world, kidney transplantation. With respect to transplantation, refugees are caught between a rock and a hard place: as recipients they have to single-handedly clear many hurdles on the arduous road to renal transplantation and as donors they are left unprotected against human organ trafficking. It should be the moral responsibility of the host country to provide this population with a support network. The ways and means of establishing this network should be defined locally; nevertheless, enabling refugees to receive a transplant is the most basic step, which should be followed by the provision of financial support and follow-up facilities in a concerted effort to ensure the continued function of the invaluable graft. It is also necessary that refugees be protected from being an organ reservoir on the black market. There are no precise regional or international data available on kidney transplantation in refugees; among the Middle East Society for Organ Transplantation countries, only Iran, Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, and Turkey have thus far provided data on their respective kidney transplantation regulations and models. Other countries in the region should follow suit and design models tailored to the local needs and conditions. What could, indubitably, be of enormous benefit in the long term is the establishment of an international committee on transplantation in refugees.
    Transplantation Proceedings 06/2007; 39(4):895-7. DOI:10.1016/j.transproceed.2007.03.095 · 0.98 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To describe clinical and radiological features of intracerebral haemorrhage in hypertensive patients. This is a descriptive case series, carried out prospectively over a period of 6 months at, department of neurology, Liaquat National Hospital, Karachi. Hypertensive patients > 25 years of age, presenting with features of stroke and verified by either CT scan or MRI brain as having intracerebral haemorrhage, were included. Clinical and radiological features were identified. Atotal of 100 patients were included in the study. Data was analyzed by SPSS version 10.0. There were 62% males and 38% females. Mean age was 56 +/- 12 years. Diabetes mellitus was present in 30% and ischaemic heart disease in 26% patients. Of all, 28% were smokers. Hemiparesis or hemiplegia (78%) was the commonest presenting feature followed by speech dysfunction (60%). Headache and vomiting were present in 20% and seizures in 9% cases. Basal ganglia (55%) was the commonest site of bleed followed by thalamus (26%), cerebral hemispheres (11%), brain stem (8%) and cerebellum (7%). Hypertensive intracerebral haemorrhage was more common in males as compared to females in our study. Hemiparesis and speech disturbances were frequent presenting features. The commonest site of bleeding was basal ganglia followed by thalamus and cerebral hemispheres.
    Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association 08/2008; 58(7):356-8. · 0.41 Impact Factor
Show more