The occurrence of male-to-female intimate partner violence on days of men’s drinking: The moderating effects of antisocial personality disorder. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 73, 239-248

Research Institute on Addictions, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, Buffalo, NY 14203, USA.
Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology (Impact Factor: 4.85). 05/2005; 73(2):239-48. DOI: 10.1037/0022-006X.73.2.239
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT In this study, the moderating effects of antisocial personality disorder (ASPD) on the day-to-day relationship between male partner alcohol consumption and male-to-female intimate partner violence (IPV) for men entering a domestic violence treatment program (n=170) or an alcoholism treatment program (n=169) were examined. For both samples, alcohol consumption was associated with an increased likelihood of nonsevere IPV among men without a diagnosis of ASPD but not among men with ASPD (who tended to engage in nonsevere IPV whether they did or did not drink). Drinking was more strongly associated with a likelihood of severe IPV among men with ASPD compared with those without ASPD who also drank. These results provide partial support for a multiple threshold model of intoxication and aggression.

  • Source
    • "Previous research has consistently found a strong positive association between alcohol consumption and IPV. This relationship has been identifi ed in the general population (Caetano et al., 2005), clinical populations (Fals-Stewart et al., 2005), and among college students (Nicholson et al., 1998; Shook et al., 2000; Williams and Smith, 1994). IPV perpetrators are fi ve times more likely than nonperpetrators to consume alcohol (Luthra and Gidycz, 2006; Riggs and O'Leary, 1989, 1996). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The present research examined the role of self-determination theory in alcohol consumption and intimate partner violence (IPV) perpetration among college students. We were interested in evaluating the extent to which individual differences in self-determination (i.e., autonomous and controlled orientations) may influence problematic alcohol use and male-to-female IPV perpetration and the extent to which problem drinking may mediate the associations between self-determination and IPV perpetration. A total of 313 incoming heterosexual, male freshman drinkers at a large northwestern university between the ages of 18 and 21 years completed self-report measures of autonomous and controlled orientations, alcohol use, and IPV perpetration as part of a larger social norms intervention study. Analyses evaluated the influence of autonomous and controlled orientations on alcohol consumption, associated problems, and IPV perpetration. The proposed model fit the data relatively well, chi(2) (11, N = 313) = 32.19, p = NS, root mean square error of approximation = .079, normed fit index = .95, nonnormed fit index = .93, comparative fit index = .96. Both autonomous and controlled orientations had significant direct and indirect effects on perpetration through alcohol consumption. Although the model fit the data well, it explained a relatively small amount of variance in both alcohol consumption (5%) and perpetration (7%). Findings support previous research implicating the role of alcohol in IPV perpetration. Additionally, our findings suggest that self-determination theory may be a useful heuristic in the examination of individual characteristics that promote alcohol consumption and IPV perpetration.
    Journal of studies on alcohol and drugs 01/2010; 71(1):78-85. DOI:10.15288/jsad.2010.71.78 · 2.27 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "Previous daily process studies of individual alcohol involvement have collected reports for as long as 2 years (Helzer et al., 2002), and daily process studies of alcoholic couples have collected data for as long as 15 months with good compliance (Fals-Stewart et al., 2005). We selected a 14-day period because, to our knowledge, this is the first study to use IVR to collect daily process data from alcoholic couples. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Daily process research on alcohol involvement has used paper-and-pencil and electronic data collection methods, but no studies have yet tested the feasibility of using Interactive Voice Response (IVR) technology to monitor drinking, affective, and social interactional processes among alcoholic (ALC) couples. This study tested the feasibility of using IVR with n = 54 ALC couples. Participants were n = 54 couples (probands who met criteria for a past 1-year alcohol use disorder and their partners) recruited from a substance abuse treatment center and the local community. Probands and their partners reported on their daily drinking, marital interactions, and moods once a day for 14 consecutive days using an IVR system. Probands and partners were on average 43.4 and 43.0 years old, respectively. Participants completed a total of 1,418 out of a possible 1,512 diary days for an overall compliance rate of 93.8%. ALC probands completed an average of 13.3 (1.0) diary reports, and partners completed an average of 13.2 (1.0) diary reports. On average, daily IVR calls lasted 7.8 (3.0) minutes for ALC probands and 7.6 (3.0) minutes for partners. Compliance was significantly lower on weekend days (Fridays and Saturdays) compared to other weekdays for probands and spouses. Although today's intoxication predicted tomorrow's noncompliance for probands but not spouses, the strongest predictor of proband's compliance was their spouse's compliance. Daily anxiety and marital conflict were associated with daily IVR nonresponse, which triggered automated reminder calls. Findings supported that IVR is a useful method for collecting daily drinking, mood, and relationship process data from alcoholic couples. Probands' compliance is strongly associated with their partners' compliance, and automated IVR calls may facilitate compliance on high anxiety, high conflict days.
    Alcoholism Clinical and Experimental Research 12/2009; 34(3):499-508. DOI:10.1111/j.1530-0277.2009.01115.x · 3.31 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "In addition to investigating the possible association between alcohol use and IPV among young men and women in intimate relationships, it is also important to consider what may account for this association. For example, this association may vary considerably based on certain characteristics of the person and the situation in which problem drinking occurs [Fals-Stewart et al., 2005]. For example, in American samples, it has been shown that the risk for IPV is particularly elevated among men whose problem drinking behavior is accompanied by antisocial personality (ASP) features [e.g., Fals- Stewart et al., 2005; Murphy and O'Farrell, 1994]. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This study is the first to provide information on the association between intimate partner violence (IPV) and binge drinking among Russian university students. Using data from 500 (58% female) university students from the four Russian sites of the International Dating Violence Study, we found gender differences in rates of IPV perpetration and in the association between binge drinking and IPV. Specifically, more females than males perpetrated IPV, and the associations between binge drinking and IPV were stronger for the female students than for the male students. In addition, antisocial traits and behavior (ATSB) were significantly related to both binge drinking and IPV perpetration for males and females. For males, the relatively weak associations between binge drinking and IPV perpetration disappeared once ASTB was accounted for. For females, the relationship decreased but remained significant when ATSB was statistically controlled. Path analyses confirmed that this pattern of relationships would be consistent with ATSB serving as a partial mediator between binge drinking and IPV perpetration. However, other alternative mediation and moderation models for the relationships between binge drinking, IPV perpetration, and ATSB could not be ruled out with this one-wave correlational study.
    Aggressive Behavior 07/2008; 34(4):416-27. DOI:10.1002/ab.20256 · 2.27 Impact Factor
Show more