Article
Intravenous myocardial contrast echocardiography predicts regional and global left ventricular remodelling after acute myocardial infarction: comparison with low dose dobutamine stress echocardiography.
Department of Cardiology, Osaka City General Hospital, Osaka, Japan.
Heart (British Cardiac Society) (impact factor:
4.22).
12/2005;
91(12):1578-83.
DOI:10.1136/hrt.2004.057521
pp.1578-83
Source: PubMed
-
Article: Left ventricular remodeling after myocardial infarction: pathophysiology and therapy.
Circulation 07/2000; 101(25):2981-8. · 14.74 Impact Factor -
Article: Analysis of microvascular integrity, contractile reserve, and myocardial viability after acute myocardial infarction by dobutamine echocardiography and myocardial contrast echocardiography.
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: The purpose of this study was to evaluate, in postinfarction dysfunctioning myocardium, the relative potential of myocardial contrast and low-dose dobutamine echocardiography in detecting myocardial viability, and the relation between microvascular integrity, contractile reserve, and functional recovery at follow-up. Twenty-four patients with recent myocardial infarction were studied before hospital discharge with low-dose dobutamine and myocardial contrast echocardiography. In the dysfunctioning infarct area, wall motion score index was calculated at baseline, during low-dose dobutamine, and at 3-month follow-up. Revascularization of the infarct-related artery was performed if clinically indicated. Eighteen patients (group A) had myocardial enhancement of the dysfunctioning infarct area at myocardial contrast echocardiography of >50%, whereas the remaining patients (group B) had an increase of < or = 50%. Wall motion score index was similar at baseline in groups A and B (2.6 +/- 0.4 and 2.8 +/- 0.2; p = NS), but it improved during low-dose dobutamine and at follow-up only in group A (1.9 +/- 0.9 and 1.9 +/- 0.7, respectively; p <0.001 vs baseline). In group B, wall motion score index was 2.7 +/- 0.4 with low-dose dobutamine and 2.8 +/- 0.2 at follow-up (p = NS vs rest). In identifying viable myocardial segments, myocardial contrast echo had 100% sensitivity and 46% specificity, whereas low-dose dobutamine echo had 71% sensitivity and 88% specificity. Thus, microvascular integrity after acute myocardial infarction is a fundamental prerequisite for ensuring myocardial contractile reserve and regional functional recovery. Myocardial contrast and low-dose dobutamine echocardiography have different, but complementary, diagnostic characteristics in detecting myocardial viability.The American Journal of Cardiology 03/1996; 77(7):441-5. · 3.37 Impact Factor -
Article: Assessment of myocardial perfusion abnormalities by intravenous myocardial contrast echocardiography with harmonic power Doppler imaging: comparison with positron emission tomography.
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Intravenous myocardial contrast echocardiography with harmonic power Doppler imaging (HPDI) enables assessment of myocardial perfusion. Its accuracy in comparison with positron emission tomography (PET), which is one of the most reliable clinical gold standards for myocardial perfusion, remains to be determined. To assess the ability of HPDI to identify myocardial perfusion abnormalities, using PET as a gold standard. 23 patients with myocardial infarction underwent HPDI. Images were obtained from the apical two and four chamber views at pulsing intervals of one to eight cardiac cycles with continuous infusion of Levovist (Schering, Germany). PET was done within two weeks of HPDI. The left ventricle was divided into 12 segments and myocardial opacification by HPDI and uptake of NH(3) by PET in each segment was graded as normal, mildly reduced, or severely reduced. Of the 276 segments examined, adequate image quality was obtained in 226 (82%) by HPDI; 50 segments were excluded because of inadequate image quality. There were more exclusions in the basal segments than in the mid or apical segments (p < 0.0001). Of the 226 segments analysed, overall concordance between HPDI and PET was 82% (chi = 0.70). In the apex, more segments were overestimated by HPDI than were underestimated (chi(2) = 6.25, p = 0.012). HPDI and PET gave similar results in the assessment of myocardial perfusion abnormalities. However, poor image quality in the basal segments and overestimation of perfusion in the apical segments are current limitations of HPDI.Heart (British Cardiac Society) 02/2003; 89(2):145-9. · 4.22 Impact Factor
Data provided are for informational purposes only. Although carefully collected, accuracy cannot be guaranteed.
The impact factor represents a rough estimation of the journal's impact factor and does not reflect the actual
current impact factor.
Publisher conditions are provided by RoMEO. Differing provisions from the publisher's actual policy or licence
agreement may be applicable.
Keywords
118 dyssynergic segments
12 segment model
2-4 weeks
21 patients
acute myocardial infarction
contractile reserve
global LV remodelling
independent predictor
intravenous myocardial contrast echocardiography
low dose dobutamine stress echocardiography
LV end diastolic volume
LV remodelling
myocardial perfusion
regional remodelling
remodelled
revascularised patients
segments
subacute stage
substantial LV dilatation
successful primary angioplasty