Comparison of warfarin and aspirin for symptomatic intracranial arterial stenosis.

Department of Neurology, School of Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, USA.
New England Journal of Medicine (Impact Factor: 54.42). 04/2005; 352(13):1305-16. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa043033
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Atherosclerotic intracranial arterial stenosis is an important cause of stroke. Warfarin is commonly used in preference to aspirin for this disorder, but these therapies have not been compared in a randomized trial.
We randomly assigned patients with transient ischemic attack or stroke caused by angiographically verified 50 to 99 percent stenosis of a major intracranial artery to receive warfarin (target international normalized ratio, 2.0 to 3.0) or aspirin (1300 mg per day) in a double-blind, multicenter clinical trial. The primary end point was ischemic stroke, brain hemorrhage, or death from vascular causes other than stroke.
After 569 patients had undergone randomization, enrollment was stopped because of concerns about the safety of the patients who had been assigned to receive warfarin. During a mean follow-up period of 1.8 years, adverse events in the two groups included death (4.3 percent in the aspirin group vs. 9.7 percent in the warfarin group; hazard ratio for aspirin relative to warfarin, 0.46; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.23 to 0.90; P=0.02), major hemorrhage (3.2 percent vs. 8.3 percent, respectively; hazard ratio, 0.39; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.18 to 0.84; P=0.01), and myocardial infarction or sudden death (2.9 percent vs. 7.3 percent, respectively; hazard ratio, 0.40; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.18 to 0.91; P=0.02). The rate of death from vascular causes was 3.2 percent in the aspirin group and 5.9 percent in the warfarin group (P=0.16); the rate of death from nonvascular causes was 1.1 percent and 3.8 percent, respectively (P=0.05). The primary end point occurred in 22.1 percent of the patients in the aspirin group and 21.8 percent of those in the warfarin group (hazard ratio, 1.04; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.73 to 1.48; P=0.83).
Warfarin was associated with significantly higher rates of adverse events and provided no benefit over aspirin in this trial. Aspirin should be used in preference to warfarin for patients with intracranial arterial stenosis.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Dependent censoring occurs in many biomedical studies and poses considerable methodological challenges for survival analysis. In this work, we develop a new approach for analyzing dependently censored data by adopting quantile regression models. We formulate covariate effects on the quantiles of the marginal distribution of the event time of interest. Such a modeling strategy can accommodate a more dynamic relationship between covariates and survival time compared to traditional regression models in survival analysis, which usually assume constant covariate effects. We propose estimation and inference procedures, along with an efficient and stable algorithm. We establish the uniform consistency and weak convergence of the resulting estimators. Extensive simulation studies demonstrate good finite-sample performance of the proposed inferential procedures. We illustrate the practical utility of our method via an application to a multicenter clinical trial that compared warfarin and aspirin in treating symptomatic intracranial arterial stenosis.
    Statistica Sinica 01/2014; 24(3):1411-1432. · 1.23 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Intracranial atherosclerosis was traditionally believed to carry a risk of stroke of 8% to 22% per annum. The annualized stroke rate in the recent stenting and aggressive medical management for preventing stroke in intracranial stenosis (SAMMPRIS) trial medical management arm was 12.2%. This trial was halted due to excessive periprocedural events in the stent arm. This stroke rate is still unacceptably, high and a treatment strategy is still needed. SAMMPRIS has no bearing on angioplasty alone. Angioplasty alone has always been our primary intervention for intracranial atherosclerosis and remains so to this day due to its relative simplicity, low complication rate, and efficacy. We have, however, made adjustments to our patient management regimen based on the results of SAMMPRIS. This paper outlines our current patient selection, procedural technique, and post-procedure management. The complications we have encountered while developing our technique are described along with how to avoid them and how to manage them. Our most recent results (since previous publications) are also discussed.
    Frontiers in Neurology 11/2014; 5:246.
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis (ICAS) of a major intracranial artery, especially middle cerebral artery (MCA), is reported to be one leading cause of ischemic stroke throughout the world. Compared with other stroke subtypes, ICAS is associated with a higher risk of recurrent stroke despite aggressive medical therapy. Increased understanding of the pathophysiology of ICAS has highlighted several possible targets for therapeutic interventions. Both luminal stenosis and plaque components of ICAS have been found to be associated with ischemic stroke based a post-mortem study. Recent application of high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging (HRMRI) in evaluating ICAS provides new insight into the vascular biology of plaque morphology and component. High signal on T1-weighted fat-suppressed images (HST1) within MCA plaque of HRMRI, highly suggested of fresh or recent intraplaque hemorrhage, has been found to be associated with ipsilateral brain infarction. Thus, the higher prevalence of intraplaque hemorrhage and neovasculature in symptomatic patients with MCA stenosis may provide a potential target for plaque stabilization. We hypothesize that RNA interference (RNAi) therapy delivered by modified nanoparticles may achieve in vivo biomedical imaging and targeted therapy. With the rapid developments in studies about therapeutic and diagnostic nanomaterials, future studies further exploring the molecular biology of atherosclerosis may provide more drug targets for plaque stabilization.
    Annals of translational medicine. 08/2014; 2(8):79.

Full-text (2 Sources)

Available from
May 31, 2014