Comparison of Warfarin and Aspirin for Symptomatic Intracranial Arterial Stenosis

University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
New England Journal of Medicine (Impact Factor: 54.42). 04/2005; 352(13):1305-16. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa043033
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Atherosclerotic intracranial arterial stenosis is an important cause of stroke. Warfarin is commonly used in preference to aspirin for this disorder, but these therapies have not been compared in a randomized trial.
We randomly assigned patients with transient ischemic attack or stroke caused by angiographically verified 50 to 99 percent stenosis of a major intracranial artery to receive warfarin (target international normalized ratio, 2.0 to 3.0) or aspirin (1300 mg per day) in a double-blind, multicenter clinical trial. The primary end point was ischemic stroke, brain hemorrhage, or death from vascular causes other than stroke.
After 569 patients had undergone randomization, enrollment was stopped because of concerns about the safety of the patients who had been assigned to receive warfarin. During a mean follow-up period of 1.8 years, adverse events in the two groups included death (4.3 percent in the aspirin group vs. 9.7 percent in the warfarin group; hazard ratio for aspirin relative to warfarin, 0.46; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.23 to 0.90; P=0.02), major hemorrhage (3.2 percent vs. 8.3 percent, respectively; hazard ratio, 0.39; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.18 to 0.84; P=0.01), and myocardial infarction or sudden death (2.9 percent vs. 7.3 percent, respectively; hazard ratio, 0.40; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.18 to 0.91; P=0.02). The rate of death from vascular causes was 3.2 percent in the aspirin group and 5.9 percent in the warfarin group (P=0.16); the rate of death from nonvascular causes was 1.1 percent and 3.8 percent, respectively (P=0.05). The primary end point occurred in 22.1 percent of the patients in the aspirin group and 21.8 percent of those in the warfarin group (hazard ratio, 1.04; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.73 to 1.48; P=0.83).
Warfarin was associated with significantly higher rates of adverse events and provided no benefit over aspirin in this trial. Aspirin should be used in preference to warfarin for patients with intracranial arterial stenosis.

Download full-text


Available from: Vicki S Hertzberg, Jul 04, 2015
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Intracranial atherosclerotic disease (ICAD) represents a major cause of stroke and transient ischemic attacks. The prevalence and natural course of ICAD are closely related to race and ethnicity. The best treatment for ICAD is a crucial issue; data from recent trials indicate that aggressive medical management and life style modifications are better than endovascular treatments for prevention of recurrent stroke in high-risk patients with ICAD. Endovascular treatment is still an option for subgroup of patients who are not responded to optimal medical therapy.
    World Journal of Cardiovascular Diseases 06/2014; 4:350-360. DOI:10.4236/wjcd.2014.47044 · 0.22 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Introduction. The initial promise of endovascular stenting for the treatment of intracranial atherosclerotic disease (ICAD) has been tempered by the results of the SAMMPRIS trial which demonstrated better outcomes with medical management compared to stenting for symptomatic ICAD. We review post-SAMMPRIS ICAD stenting outcomes. Methods. A comprehensive literature search was performed using PubMed to identify all ICAD stenting series published after the SAMMPRIS in September 2011. The type and design of the stent, number of patients and lesions, inclusion criteria, and clinical and angiographic outcomes were noted. Results. From October 2011 to August 2013, 19 ICAD stenting series were identified describing the interventional outcomes for 2,196 patients with 2,314 lesions. Of the 38 different stents used, 87% were balloon-expandable stents (BESs) and 13% were self-expanding stents. The median minimum stenosis was 50%. The median rates of technical success rate, postprocedural ischemic events, and symptomatic in-stent restenosis (ISR) were 98% (range 87-100%), 9.4% (range 0-25%), and 2.7% (range 0-11.1%), respectively. The median follow-up durations were one to 67 months. Conclusions. The management of severe ICAD remains controversial. Future trials are needed to define the optimal patient, lesion, and stent characteristics which will portend the best outcomes with intervention.
    11/2013; 2013:304320. DOI:10.1155/2013/304320
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Collateral circulation in intracranial atherosclerosis has never been systematically characterized. We investigated collaterals in a multicenter trial of symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic disease. Baseline angiography was reviewed for information on collaterals in stenoses of the internal carotid, middle cerebral, vertebral, and basilar arteries. A battery of angiographic scales was utilized to evaluate lesion site, arterial patency, antegrade flow, downstream territorial perfusion, and collateral circulation, blinded to all other data. Collateral circulation was adequately available for analysis in 287/569 (50%) subjects with proximal arterial stenoses ranging from 50% to 99%. Extent of collaterals was absent or none in 69%, slow or minimal in 10%, more rapid, yet incomplete perfusion of territory in 7%, complete but delayed perfusion in 11%, and rapid, complete collateral perfusion in 4%. Extent of collateral flow correlated with percentage of stenosis (P<0.0001), with more severe stenoses exhibiting greater compensation via collaterals. Overall, collateral grade increased with diminished antegrade flow across the lesion (thrombolysis in myocardial ischemia) and resultant downstream perfusion (thrombolysis in cerebral infarction) (both P<0.001). Our findings provide the initial detailed description of collaterals across a variety of stenoses, suggesting that collateral perfusion is a pivotal component in pathophysiology of intracranial atherosclerosis and implicating the need for further evaluation in ongoing studies.
    Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism: official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism 12/2010; 31(5):1293-301. DOI:10.1038/jcbfm.2010.224 · 5.34 Impact Factor