Article

Remission in depressed geriatric primary care patients: A report from the PROSPECT study

Department of Psychiatry, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, USA.
American Journal of Psychiatry (Impact Factor: 13.56). 04/2005; 162(4):718-24. DOI: 10.1176/appi.ajp.162.4.718
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT This study compared time to first remission for elderly depressed patients in primary care for practices that implemented a care management model versus those providing usual care. In addition, it sought to identify risk factors for nonremission that could guide treatment planning and referral to care managers or specialists.
Prevention of Suicide in Primary Care Elderly: Collaborative Trial (PROSPECT) data were analyzed. Participants were older patients (> or =60 years) selected following screening of 9,072 randomly identified primary care patients. The present analysis examined patients with major depression and a 24-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale score of 18 or greater who were followed for at least 4 months (N=215). Primary care practices were randomly assigned to offer the PROSPECT intervention or usual care. The intervention consisted of services of trained care managers, who offered algorithm-based recommendations to physicians and helped patients with treatment adherence over 18 months.
First remission occurred earlier and was more common among patients receiving the intervention than among those receiving usual care. For all patients, limitations in physical and emotional functions predicted poor remission rate. Patients experiencing hopelessness were more likely to achieve remission if treated in intervention practices. Similarly, the intervention was more effective in patients with low baseline anxiety.
Longitudinal assessment of depression, hopelessness, anxiety, and physical and emotional functional limitations in depressed older primary care patients is critical. Patients with prominent symptoms or impairment in these areas may be candidates for care management or mental health care, since they are at risk for remaining depressed and disabled.

0 Followers
 · 
86 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The broadening use of antidepressants among older Americans has not been associated with a notable decrease in the burden of geriatric depression. This article, based on a selective review of the literature, explores several explanations for this paradox. The authors propose that the effectiveness of antidepressants depends in large part on the way they are used. Evidence supports that antidepressant pharmacotherapy leads to better outcomes when guided by a treatment algorithm as opposed to attempting to individualize treatment. Several published guidelines and pharmacotherapy algorithms developed for the treatment of geriatric depression are reviewed, and an updated algorithm proposed.
    Clinics in Geriatric Medicine 08/2014; 30(3). DOI:10.1016/j.cger.2014.05.002 · 3.19 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The aims of the study were to examine the validity of the MADRS and to compare it with the validity of the Cornell Scale for Depression in Dementia (CSDD). We included 140 patients without dementia, with mean age 81.5 (sd 7.7) years. Trained psychiatric nurses interviewed all of them using the MADRS. In addition, for 70 patients caregivers were interviewed using the CSDD. A psychiatrist who had no access to the MADRS or the CSDD results made a diagnosis of depression according to the DSM-IV criteria for major depression, and the ICD-10 criteria was also applied for the 70 patients assessed with the CSDD. Twenty-two out of the 140 had depression according to the DSM IV criteria, whereas 25 out of 70 had depression according to the ICD-10 criteria. The area under the curve (auc) in a receiver operating characteristic analysis was 0.86 (95% CI 0.79-0.93) for the MADRS using the DSM-IV criteria. The best cut-off point was 16/17 with sensitivity of 0.80 and specificity of 0.82. The AUC for the CSDD was 0.83 (95% CI 0.71-0.95). The recommended cut-off score on the CSDD of 7/8 was valid but not the best in this study. The patients were diagnosed with a diagnosis of depression by only one psychiatrist, and the procedures in the two centres were not exactly the same. The MADRS has good discriminating power to detect depression in elderly persons and should be preferred to the CSDD for use with persons without dementia.
    Journal of Affective Disorders 03/2012; 141(2-3):227-32. DOI:10.1016/j.jad.2012.02.042 · 3.71 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: We sought to examine whether there are patterns of evolving depression symptoms among older primary care patients that are related to prognostic factors and long-term clinical outcomes. Primary care practices were randomly assigned to Usual Care or to an intervention consisting of a depression care manager offering algorithm-based depression care. In all, 599 adults 60 years and older meeting criteria for major depression or clinically significant minor depression were randomly selected. Longitudinal analysis via growth curve mixture modeling was carried out to classify patients according to the patterns of depression symptoms across 12 months. Depression diagnosis determined after a structured interview at 24 months was the long-term clinical outcome. Three patterns of change in depression symptoms over 12 months were identified: high persistent course (19.1% of the sample), high declining course (14.4% of the sample), and low declining course (66.5% of the sample). Being in the intervention condition was more likely to be associated with a course of high and declining depression symptoms than high and persistent depression symptoms (OR = 2.53, 95% CI [1.01, 6.37]). Patients with a course of high and persistent depression symptoms were much more likely to have a diagnosis of major depression at 24 months compared with patients with a course of low and declining depression symptoms (adjusted OR = 16.46, 95% CI [7.75, 34.95]). Identification of patients at particularly high risk of persistent depression symptoms and poor long-term clinical outcomes is important for the development and delivery of interventions.
    Aging and Mental Health 02/2012; 16(4):452-61. DOI:10.1080/13607863.2011.638904 · 1.78 Impact Factor

Preview

Download
1 Download
Available from