Health information technology and physician-patient interactions: Impact of computers on communication during outpatient primary care visits

Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis, Indianapolis, Indiana, United States
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association (Impact Factor: 3.93). 07/2005; 12(4):474-80. DOI: 10.1197/jamia.M1741
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of introducing health information technology (HIT) on physician-patient interactions during outpatient visits.
This was a longitudinal pre-post study: two months before and one and seven months after introduction of examination room computers. Patient questionnaires (n = 313) after primary care visits with physicians (n = 8) within an integrated delivery system. There were three patient satisfaction domains: (1) satisfaction with visit components, (2) comprehension of the visit, and (3) perceptions of the physician's use of the computer.
Patients reported that physicians used computers in 82.3% of visits. Compared with baseline, overall patient satisfaction with visits increased seven months after the introduction of computers (odds ratio [OR] = 1.50; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.01-2.22), as did satisfaction with physicians' familiarity with patients (OR = 1.60, 95% CI: 1.01-2.52), communication about medical issues (OR = 1.61; 95% CI: 1.05-2.47), and comprehension of decisions made during the visit (OR = 1.63; 95% CI: 1.06-2.50). In contrast, there were no significant changes in patient satisfaction with comprehension of self-care responsibilities, communication about psychosocial issues, or available visit time. Seven months post-introduction, patients were more likely to report that the computer helped the visit run in a more timely manner (OR = 1.76; 95% CI: 1.28-2.42) compared with the first month after introduction. There were no other significant changes in patient perceptions of the computer use over time.
The examination room computers appeared to have positive effects on physician-patient interactions related to medical communication without significant negative effects on other areas such as time available for patient concerns. Further study is needed to better understand HIT use during outpatient visits.


Available from: Holly Brugge Jimison, Apr 21, 2015
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In this study we sought to better understand how EMR systems are actually being used by family physicians and what they perceive to be the performance outcomes for themselves and their medical practices. To achieve our objectives, we conducted a survey of family physicians in Quebec, Canada and obtained responses from 780 physicians. Key findings reveal that EMR systems “as-used” vary from one physician to another in terms of the EMR capabilities that are actually mobilized by them. Two user profiles were identified, that is, Meaningful and Basic users. Significant differences between the two groups were found in terms of physician demographics and system characteristics. In terms of perceived outcomes, physicians were clustered under three profiles that could be clearly distinguished from one another, namely Highly Impacted, Slightly Impacted and Non Impacted users. Findings show that Highly Impacted physicians are those who are the most experienced with EMRs and those who make the most wide-ranging use of their system capabilities. Practical and research implications of this study are discussed.
    48th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS); 01/2015
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background Numerous calls have been made for greater assimilation of information technology in healthcare organizations in general, and in primary care settings in particular. Considering the levels of IT investment and adoption in primary care medical practices, a deeper understanding is needed of the factors leading to greater performance outcomes from EMR systems in primary care. To address this issue, we developed and tested a research model centered on the concept of Extended EMR Use. Methods An online survey was conducted of 331 family physicians in Canadian private medical practices to empirically test seven research hypotheses using a component-based structural equation modeling approach. Results Five hypotheses were partially or fully supported by our data. Family physicians in our sample used 67% of the clinical and 41% of the communicational functionalities available in their EMR systems, compared to 90% of the administrative features. As expected, extended use was associated with significant improvements in perceived performance benefits. Interestingly, the benefits derived from system use were mainly tied to the clinical support provided by an EMR system. The extent to which physicians were using their EMR systems was influenced by two system design characteristics: functional coverage and ease of use. The more functionalities that are available in an EMR system and the easier they are to use, the greater the potential for exploration, assimilation and appropriation by family physicians. Conclusions Our study has contributed to the extant literature by proposing a new concept: Extended EMR Use. In terms of its practical implications, our study reveals that family physicians must use as many of the capabilities supported by their EMR system as possible, especially those which support clinical tasks, if they are to maximize its performance benefits. To ensure extended use of their software, vendors must develop EMR systems that satisfy two important design characteristics: functional coverage and system ease of use.
    BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 04/2015; 15. DOI:10.1186/s12911-015-0152-8 · 1.50 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background Previous work has examined the impact of technology on information sharing and communication between doctors and patients in general practice consultations, but very few studies have explored this in hospital settings.AimsTo assess if, and how, senior clinicians use an iPad to share information (e.g. patient test results) with patients during ward-rounds and to explore patients’ and doctors’ experiences of information sharing events.Methods Ten senior doctors were shadowed on ward-rounds on general wards during interactions with 525 patients over 77.3 hours, seven senior doctors were interviewed and 180 patients completed a short survey.ResultsDoctors reported that information sharing with patients is critical to the delivery of high quality healthcare, but were not seen to use the iPad to share information with patients on ward-rounds. Patients did not think the iPad had impacted on their engagement with doctors on rounds. Ward-rounds were observed to follow set routines and patient interactions were brief.Conclusions Although the iPad potentially creates new opportunities for information sharing and patient engagement, the ward-round may not present the most appropriate context for this to be done.
    Internal Medicine Journal 07/2014; 44(10). DOI:10.1111/imj.12518 · 1.70 Impact Factor