Productive work and employment for persons with traumatic brain injury: What have we learned after 20 years?

Virginia Commonwealth University Rehabilitation Research and Training Center on Workplace Supports, Richmond, VA 23284, USA.
Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation (Impact Factor: 2.92). 03/2005; 20(2):115-27. DOI: 10.1097/00001199-200503000-00001
Source: PubMed


This article describes return to work outcomes for individuals with traumatic brain injury (TBI) through a selective review of the published literature and an examination of TBI labor force participation from the Rehabilitation Services Administration 91l and the Social Security Administration Benefits Planning, Assistance and Outreach databases. Implications and recommendations to further our understanding about the different parts of the work outcome profile of individuals with TBI are offered.

Download full-text


Available from: Pamela Targett, Nov 20, 2014
  • Source
    • "al integration within the community , more frequent pursuit of leisure and home activities , and greater health status , less usage of health services , more social contact , greater autonomy and a clearer sense of personal identity ( Webb et al . , 1995 ; O ' Neill et al . , 1998 , 2004 ; Corrigan et al . , 2001 ; Steadman - Pare et al . , 2001 ; Wehman et al . , 2005 ) . The World Health Organization ' s International Classification of Functioning , Disability and Health ( IFC ) highlights that returning to work is a key component of rehabilitation and should not remain a marginal outcome of recovery ( WHO , 2001 ) . Powell et al . ( 2012 ) reported that participants who demonstrated higher levels o"
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The idea that acquired brain injury (ABI) caused by stroke, hemorrhage, infection or traumatic insult to the brain can result in post-traumatic growth (PTG) for individuals is increasingly attracting psychological attention. However, PTG also attracts controversy as a result of ambiguous empirical findings. The extent that demographic variables, injury factors, subjective beliefs, and psychological health are associated with PTG following ABI is not clear. Consequently, this systematic review and meta-analysis explores the correlates of variables within these four broad areas and PTG. From a total of 744 published studies addressing PTG in people with ABI, eight studies met inclusion criteria for detailed examination. Meta-analysis of these studies indicated that growth was related to employment, longer education, subjective beliefs about change post-injury, relationship status, older age, longer time since injury, and lower levels of depression. Results from homogeneity analyses indicated significant inter-study heterogeneity across variables. There is general support for the idea that people with ABI can experience growth, and that various demographics, injury-related variables, subjective beliefs and psychological health are related to growth. The contribution of social integration and the forming of new identities post-ABI to the experience of PTG is explored. These meta-analytic findings are however constrained by methodological limitations prevalent in the literature. Clinical and research implications are discussed with specific reference to community and collective factors that enable PTG.
    Frontiers in Psychology 08/2015; 6. DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01162 · 2.80 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "Ownsworth and McKenna (2004) also contend that loss of employment potential has many personal consequences that influence self-identity, autonomy, and emotional well-being. Employment outcome represents one of the best indications of real-world functioning that can be assessed in more clearly defined terms than other psychosocial outcomes (Kissinger, 2008; Prigatono, 1989; Wehman et al., 2005). The ability to predict vocational outcome using evidence-based guidelines is important in a number of contexts, including rehabilitation planning, the development of specialized vocational support services, and individual and family role adjustment (Cattelani, Tanzi, Lombardi & Mazzucchi, 2002; Simpson & Schmitter-Edgecombe, 2002). "

    Journal of Workplace Behavioral Health 01/2012; 27(4):227.
  • Source
    • "An interesting finding was that contrary to the TBI rehabilitation literature [59], supported employment was not a significant predictor of employment outcome for VR clients in this study. Primarily concerned with maintaining employment, supported employment programs have traditionally been defined as involving competitive employment, integrated work settings, and the provision of on-going job support [30]. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This study analyzed the Rehabilitation Services Administration (RSA) case service report (RSA-911) data for fiscal year 2004 to examine effects of demographic characteristics, work disincentives, and vocational rehabilitation services patterns on employment outcomes of persons with traumatic brain injuries (TBI). The results indicated that European Americans (53%) had appreciably higher competitive employment rates than Native American (50%), Asian Americans (44%), African Americans (42%), and Hispanic/Latino Americans (41%). Clients without co-occurring psychiatric disabilities had a higher employment rate (51%) than those with psychiatric disabilities (45%). Clients without work disincentives showed better employment outcomes (58%) than those with disincentives (45%). An important finding from this analysis was the central role of job search assistance, job placement assistance, and on-the-job support services for persons with TBI in predicting employment outcomes. A data mining technique, the exhaustive CHAID analysis, was used to examine the interaction effects of race, gender, work disincentives and service variables on employment outcomes. The results indicated that the TBI clients in this study could be segmented into 29 homogeneous subgroups with employment rates ranging from a low of 11% to a high of 82%, and these differences can be explained by differences in work disincentives, race, and rehabilitation service patterns.
    Neurorehabilitation 02/2006; 21(4):279-93. · 1.12 Impact Factor
Show more