Article
Oral versus vaginal sex among adolescents: perceptions, attitudes, and behavior.
Division of Adolescent Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, University of California, San Francisco, California 94118, USA.
PEDIATRICS (impact factor:
4.47).
05/2005;
115(4):845-51.
DOI:10.1542/peds.2004-2108
pp.845-51
Source: PubMed
-
Citations (0)
- Cited In (4)
-
Article: Who's doing it? Patterns and predictors of youths' oral sexual experiences.
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: To describe patterns of heterosexual oral sexual experience in a nationally representative sample of youth aged 15 to 21 and identify social and demographic correlates of oral sexual experience among youth who had not engaged in vaginal intercourse. Descriptive analysis and multinomial logistic regression using data from Cycle 6 of the National Survey of Family Growth, conducted in 2002. More youth with coital experience than virgin youth had oral sexual experience, and the proportion of both groups with oral sexual experience increased with age. Having received oral sex was more common than having given it, regardless of virginity status and gender. Although fewer females than males had ever-received oral sex, equal proportions of females and males had ever-given. Multivariate analyses revealed that white females were more likely than black females, and white males were more likely than black and Hispanic males to be virgins and to have had oral but not vaginal sex. Intact family structure, a college-educated mother, and no religious affiliation were associated with higher odds of oral sexual experience among virgin females, whereas intact family structure, no religious service attendance, and central city residence were associated with higher odds of oral sexual experience among virgin males. Oral sex with an opposite-gender partner is an established component of youths' initial sexual experiences, regardless of virginity status. Information on the risks of oral-genital contact should be integrated into sexual education programs targeted to youth.Journal of Adolescent Health 02/2008; 42(1):73-80. · 3.33 Impact Factor -
Article: Oral human papillomavirus (HPV) infection--are there implications for HPV vaccination?
The Journal of Infectious Diseases 02/2010; 201(3):478; author reply 478-9. · 6.41 Impact Factor -
Article: Sexually transmitted infections and adolescence.
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Sexually transmitted infections (STIs) remain a public health problem of major significance in most of the world. Adolescents make up about 20% of the world population, of whom 85% live in developing countries. They are at a greater risk of STIs because they frequently have unprotected intercourse, biologically may be more susceptible to infection, often are engaged in multiple monogamous relationships of limited duration, and face multiple obstacles in accessing confidential health care services. Young people who begin to have sexual intercourse in early or middle adolescence are more likely to develop an STI than those who postpone intercourse until later adolescence or adulthood. The most common STIs among adolescents are chlamydia, gonorrhea, human papillomavirus infection, and trichomoniasis. Unfortunately, lately the incidence of HIV/AIDS and syphilis among adolescents is growing. Comprehensive sex education programs in schools can increase STI knowledge and prevent risky sexual behaviors. Health care providers can promote STI prevention methods, including counseling about safe sex.Acta dermatovenerologica Croatica : ADC. 12/2010; 18(4):305-10.
Data provided are for informational purposes only. Although carefully collected, accuracy cannot be guaranteed.
The impact factor represents a rough estimation of the journal's impact factor and does not reflect the actual
current impact factor.
Publisher conditions are provided by RoMEO. Differing provisions from the publisher's actual policy or licence
agreement may be applicable.
Keywords
adolescent sexuality
adolescents perceive oral sex
adolescents view oral sex
adolescents' perceptions
benefit perceptions
clinical preventive services
emotional consequences
empirical studies
health care providers
intervention efforts
longitudinal study
narrow focus
next 6 months
nondating situations
oral sex
percent chance
self-administered questionnaire
sexual experiences
study participants
vaginal sex