Article

The Iowa Gambling Task and the somatic marker hypothesis

Department of Neurology (Division of Cognitive Neuroscience), University of Iowa College of Medicine, Iowa, USA.
Trends in Cognitive Sciences (Impact Factor: 21.15). 05/2005; 9(4):159-62; discussion 162-4. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2005.02.002
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT A recent study by Maia and McClelland on participants' knowledge in the Iowa Gambling Task suggests a different interpretation for an experiment we reported in 1997. The authors use their results to question the evidence for the somatic marker hypothesis. Here we consider whether the authors' conclusions are justified.

2 Followers
 · 
147 Views
  • Source
    • "Both internal factors (e.g., current need, past experience, emotion) and external factors (e.g., environmental conditions, time constraints) can influence this evaluation process. Normally, decisions are made under uncertain conditions (Kacelnik and Bateson 1997), which can be divided into decisions involving risk (where the probability of each outcome is known) and decisions involving ambiguity (where the outcome is unknown) (Bechara et al. 2005; Krain et al. 2006). There is evidence supporting the notion that the two processes, decisionmaking under ambiguity (judgement) and decision-making under risk, involve different neural substrates (Krain et al. 2006). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Low birth weight (LBW) in humans is a risk factor for later cognitive, behavioural and emotional problems. In pigs, LBW is associated with higher mortality, but little is known about consequences for surviving piglets. Alteration in hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis function in LBW pigs suggests altered emotionality, but no behavioural indicators have been studied. Decision-making under uncertain conditions, e.g., risk or ambiguity, is susceptible to emotional influences and may provide a means of assessing long-term effects of LBW in piglets. We tested LBW (N = 8) and normal-birth-weight (NBW; N = 8) male pigs in two decision-making tasks. For decision-making under risk, we developed a simple two-choice probabilistic task, the Pig Gambling Task (PGT), where an 'advantageous' option offered small but frequent rewards and a 'disadvantageous' option offered large but infrequent rewards. The advantageous option offered greater overall gain. For decision-making under ambiguity, we used a Judgement Bias Task (JBT) where pigs were trained to make an active response to 'positive' and 'negative' tone cues (signalling large and small rewards, respectively). Responses to ambiguous tone cues were rated as more or less optimistic. LBW pigs chose the advantageous option more often in later blocks of the PGT, and were scored as less optimistic in the JBT, than NBW pigs. Our findings demonstrate that LBW pigs have developed different behavioural strategies with respect to decision-making. We propose that this is guided by changes in emotionality in LBW piglets, and we provide behavioural evidence of increased negative affect in LBW piglets.
    Animal Cognition 12/2014; 18(2). DOI:10.1007/s10071-014-0825-1 · 2.63 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "The BART could be solved by following response preferences based on somatic markers ( Bechara et al . , 2005 ; Brand et al . , 2006 ) , as well , which would more likely characterize participants with low EFs . Consequently , in the present study , we assumed that participants with high EFs would solve the BART with a different underlying strategy . We expected larger FRN amplitude in the high EF than in the low EF group reflecting enhanced fe"
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The aim of the present study was to investigate the role of executive functions (EFs) in different strategies underlying risky decision making. Adult participants from a nonclinical sample were assigned to low or high EF groups based on their performance on EF tasks measuring shifting, updating, and inhibition. ERPs were recorded while participants performed the Balloon Analogue Risk Task (BART). In this task, each balloon pump was associated with either a reward or a balloon pop with unknown probability. The BART behavioral measures did not show between-group differences. However, the feedback-related negativity (FRN) associated with undesirable outcomes was larger in the high EF group than in the low EF group. Since the FRN represents salience prediction error, our results suggest that the high EF group formed internal models that were violated by the outcomes. Thus, we provided ERP evidence for EFs influencing risky decision-making processes.
    Psychophysiology 09/2014; 52(3). DOI:10.1111/psyp.12331 · 3.18 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "In the literature of decision-making there is a common distinction between decisions under ambiguity and decisions under risk (e.g., Bechara et al., 2005). In ambiguous decisions, the probability of a specific outcome is either unknown or close to chance and the two choices do not differ in reward value nor in the likelihood of negative consequences. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This study examines by means of fMRI the neural mechanisms underlying adolescents’ risk decision-making in social contexts. We hypothesize that the social context could engage brain regions associated with social cognition processes and developmental changes are also expected. Sixty participants (adolescents: 17-18, and young adults: 21-22 years old) read narratives describing typical situations of decision-making in the presence of peers. They were asked to make choices in risky situations (e.g., taking or refusing a drug) or ambiguous situations (e.g., eating a hamburger or a hotdog). Risky as compared to ambiguous scenarios activated bilateral temporoparietal junction (TPJ), bilateral middle temporal gyrus (MTG), right medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC), and the precuneus bilaterally; i.e., brain regions related to social cognition processes, such as self-reflection and theory of mind. In addition, brain structures related to cognitive control were active (right ACC, bilateral DLPFC, bilateral OFC), whereas no significant clusters were obtained in the reward system (VS). Choosing the dangerous option involved a further activation of control areas (ACC) and emotional and social cognition areas (temporal pole). Adolescents employed more neural resources than young adults in the right DLPFC and the right TPJ in risk situations. When choosing the dangerous option, young adults showed a further engagement in theory of mind related regions (bilateral middle temporal gyrus) and in motor control regions related to the planning of actions (pre-supplementary motor area). Finally, the right insula and the right superior temporal gyrus were more activated in women than in men, suggesting more emotional involvement and more intensive modeling of the others’ perspective in the risky conditions. These findings call for more comprehensive developmental accounts of decision-making in social contexts that incorporate the role of emotional and social cognition processes.
    Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 02/2014; 8:60. DOI:10.3389/fnhum.2014.00060 · 2.90 Impact Factor
Show more

Preview

Download
8 Downloads
Available from