Article

The Hippocratic oath and contemporary medicine: dialectic between past ideals and present reality?

Rice University, Houston, TX 77005, USA.
Journal of Medicine and Philosophy (Impact Factor: 0.79). 03/2005; 30(1):107-28. DOI: 10.1080/03605310590907084
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The Hippocratic Oath, the Hippocratic tradition, and Hippocratic ethics are widely invoked in the popular medical culture as conveying a direction to medical practice and the medical profession. This study critically addresses these invocations of Hippocratic guideposts, noting that reliance on the Hippocratic ethos and the Oath requires establishing (1) what the Oath meant to its author, its original community of reception, and generally for ancient medicine (2) what relationships contemporary invocations of the Oath and the tradition have to the original meaning of the Oath and its original reception (3) what continuity exists and under what circumstances over the last two-and-a-half millenniums of medical-moral reflections (4) what continuity there is in the meaning of professionalism from the time of Hippocrates to the 21st century, and (5) what social factors in particular have transformed the medical profession in particular countries. This article argues that the resources for a better understanding of medical professionalism lie not in the Hippocratic Oath, tradition, or ethos in and of themselves. Rather, it must be found in a philosophy of medicine that explores the values internal to medicine, thus providing a medical-moral philosophy so as to be able to resist the deformation of medical professionalism by bioethics, biopolitics, and governmental regulation. The Oath, as well as Stephen H. Miles' recent monograph, The Hippocratic Oath and the Ethics of Medicine, are employed as heuristics, so as to throw into better light the extent to which the Hippocratic Oath, tradition, and ethics can provide guidance and direction, as well as to show the necessity of taking seriously the need for a substantive philosophy of medicine.

2 Followers
 · 
277 Views
  • Source
    • "The Hippocratic Oath, the Hippocratic Tradition and Hippocratic ethics are widely cited in a medical culture and are seen as a source of medical professionalism, by providing medical practice with its principles of ethical conduct. The Oath creates a professional identity and an outline of moral obligation [11]. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The privacy of patient information is important yet healthcare professionals are resistant to Health Information Systems, Information Technology usage and particularly information security mechanisms. In this paper, a literature review is used to gain knowledge about the medical and information security cultures involved. The gap between the intention to use Information Technology and actual compliance is examined with an investigation of behavioural change agents as Information Technology-usage motivators. Research reveals emotions as strong motivators of attitudes and behaviours. The Coping Model of User Adaptation is reviewed together with the Appraisal Tendency Framework. Logical argumentation is used to propose a theory that uses a behavioural change agent with the Coping Model of User Adaptation and the Framework for Classifying Emotions (an off-shoot of the Appraisal Tendency Framework) as tools. This theory will promote emotions that are conducive to information security obedience (or ‘good’ information security behaviour) in the healthcare context.
    Hcist 2013; 10/2013
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Este estudio se ha orientado partiendo de los siguientes objetivos: Vincular el principio de pertinencia metodológica e instrumental a las características del objeto-sujeto investigado en el marco epistemológico de una disciplina. Reflexionar sobre la pertinencia de la investigación cualitativa y las fuentes histórico-etnográficas en ciencias socio-sanitarias y humanas (particularmente la enfermería) y humanas (debido a su holismo). El desarrollo del tema se ha vertebrado mediante un proceso de análisis centrado en las tres fases cruciales en la obra de Edgar Morin: Dialéctica entre lo real y lo imaginario (antropología de la muerte); dialéctica antropocosmológica y, por último desarrolla la dialógica antropo-bio-cósmica. Conclusiones: A partir de Morin se vislumbra una visión de la realidad más multidimensional y holística, dado que hasta bien entrado el siglo XX, el conocimiento se basaba en abstracción, parcelación, simplificación, reduccionismo, generación de leyes, etc. Morin pretende humanizar la ciencia mediante una antropología transdisciplinar en la que la dinámica experiencial del ser humano se contempla de forma más global partiendo del paradigma de la complejidad, constituyendo la metodología cualitativa un instrumento pertinente para la clarificación holística.
    01/2005;
Show more

Preview

Download
5 Downloads
Available from