A comparison of response to cisplatin, radiation and combined treatment for cells deficient in recombination repair pathways.

Medical Physics Department, Integrated Cancer Program, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K1H 8L6.
Anticancer research (Impact Factor: 1.71). 01/2005; 25(1A):53-8.
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The responses of cells with mutated DNA repair pathways were compared for cisplatin, radiation and combination treatments. The knockout of the nonhomologous endjoining (NHEJ) pathway resulted in increased radiation sensitivity, but no change in cisplatin response in the mouse cells and increased radiosensitivity but decreased cisplatin sensitivity in chicken cells. The mutation of the homologous recombination repair (HR) pathway through XRCC3 in CHO cells resulted in increased radiation and cisplatin sensitivity and to a lesser extent for the Rad54 knockout in the DT40 chicken cells. The combination treatments of cisplatin and radiation showed that inhibition of the HR repair pathway resulted in super additive effects while the inhibition of the NHEJ pathway in DT40 had no effect. In mouse cells the knockout of the NHEJ pathway resulted in reduced super additivity compared to the parental cell lines. These data show that radiation, cisplatin and combination treatment damage is affected differently by the various DNA repair pathways, which could have a range of effects on combination treatments in tumour cells expressing different levels of DNA repair in the various repair pathways.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The treatment for advanced stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) often includes platinum-based chemotherapy and IR. Cisplatin and IR combination therapy display schedule and dose-dependent synergy, the mechanism of which is not completely understood. In a series of in vitro and cell culture assays in a NSCLC model, we investigated both the downstream and direct treatment and damage effects of cisplatin on NHEJ catalyzed repair of a DNA DSB. The results demonstrate that extracts prepared from cisplatin-treated cells are fully capable of NHEJ catalyzed repair of a DSB using a non-cisplatin-damaged DNA substrate in vitro. Similarly, using two different host cell reactivation assays, treatment of cells prior to transfection of a linear, undamaged reporter plasmid revealed no reduction in NHEJ compared with untreated cells. In contrast, transfection of a linear GFP-reporter plasmid containing site-specific, cisplatin lesions 6-bp from the termini revealed a significant impairment in DSB repair of the cisplatin-damaged DNA substrates in the absence of cellular treatment with cisplatin. Together, these data demonstrate that impaired NHEJ in combined cisplatin-IR treated cells is likely the result of a direct effect of cisplatin-DNA lesions near a DSB and that the indirect cellular effects of cisplatin treatment are not significant contributors to the synergistic cytotoxicity observed with combination cisplatin-IR treatment.
    Journal of Biological Chemistry 05/2012; 287(29):24263-72. · 4.65 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The number of biomarker candidates is often much larger than the number of clinical patient data points available, which motivates the use of a rational candidate variable filtering methodology. The goal of this paper is to apply such a bioinformatics filtering process to isolate a modest number (<10) of key interacting genes and their associated single nucleotide polymorphisms involved in radiation response, and to ultimately serve as a basis for using clinical datasets to identify new biomarkers. In step 1, we surveyed the literature on genetic and protein correlates to radiation response, in vivo or in vitro, across cellular, animal, and human studies. In step 2, we analyzed two publicly available microarray datasets and identified genes in which mRNA expression changed in response to radiation. Combining results from Step 1 and Step 2, we identified 20 genes that were common to all three sources. As a final step, a curated database of protein interactions was used to generate the most statistically reliable protein interaction network among any subset of the 20 genes resulting from Steps 1 and 2, resulting in identification of a small, tightly interacting network with 7 out of 20 input genes. We further ranked the genes in terms of likely importance, based on their location within the network using a graph-based scoring function. The resulting core interacting network provides an attractive set of genes likely to be important to radiation response.
    PLoS ONE 01/2012; 7(6):e38870. · 3.73 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Dry films of platinum chemotherapeutic drugs covalently bound to plasmid DNA (Pt-DNA) represent a useful experimental model to investigate direct effects of radiation on DNA in close proximity to platinum chemotherapeutic agents, a situation of considerable relevance to understand the mechanisms underlying concomitant chemoradiation therapy. In the present paper we determine the optimum conditions for preparation of Pt-DNA films for use in irradiation experiments. Incubation conditions for DNA platination reactions have a substantial effect on the structure of Pt-DNA in the films. The quantity of Pt bound to DNA as a function of incubation time and temperature is measured by inductively coupled plasma mass spectroscopy. Our experiments indicate that chemical instability and damage to DNA in Pt-DNA samples increase when DNA platination occurs at 37(°)C for 24 hours, the condition which has been extensively used for in vitro studies. Platination of DNA for the formation of Pt-DNA films is optimal at room temperature for reaction times less than 2 hours. By increasing the concentration of Pt compounds relative to DNA and thus accelerating the rate of their mutual binding, it is possible to prepare Pt-DNA samples containing known concentrations of Pt while reducing DNA degradation caused by more lengthy procedures.
    Bioinorganic Chemistry and Applications 01/2012; 2012:923914. · 1.17 Impact Factor


Available from