Article

From Referral to Disposition: Case Processing in Seven Mental Health Courts

PRA Inc., Albany, NY 12054, USA.
Behavioral Sciences & the Law (Impact Factor: 0.96). 03/2005; 23(2):215-26. DOI: 10.1002/bsl.641
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The number of mental health courts in the United States is rapidly increasing, from one in 1997 to nearly 100 in 2004. However, to date there is comparatively little research regarding these specialty courts. The present study reports data on the referral and disposition decision-making processes of seven mental health courts. Information on all referrals to the seven courts over a three-month period was gathered. Results show that, in comparison with individuals involved in the criminal justice system, mental health court clients are more likely to be older, White, and women than individuals in the general criminal justice system. Furthermore, this over-representation occurs at the point of referral, rather than at the point of the court's decision to accept or reject a referral. In addition, the length of time from referral to diversion is much longer in these mental health courts than in other types of diversion programs. Implications of these findings are discussed.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: John Petrila, Aug 29, 2015
0 Followers
 · 
109 Views
  • Source
    • "ly to be arrested after involvement in MHC . Therefore , as Steadman et al . ( 2011 ) suggest , the question is not whether MHCs work , but for whom they work best . Since the first MHC , researchers have also examined the inner workings of MHCs to determine similarities and differences across courts ( Griffin et al . 2002 ; Redlich et al . 2005 ; Steadman et al . 2005 ) . In the largest of these studies , Redlich and colleagues ( 2005 ) conducted a national survey of 40 MHCs and suggested a ' ' second generation ' ' of courts were emerging that differed from the original MHCs . They noted four dimensions that separate this second generation from the original MHCs : post - plea ( rather than pre - ple"
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Using a statewide database of mental health court (MHC) defendants, this study examines criminal justice outcomes by target arrest offense type. Findings suggest that defendants with a felony are less likely to complete MHC but those who do are at no greater risk of recidivism post-exit than those with a misdemeanor. In terms of jail days, both completers and noncompleters with a felony had reductions in jail days; however, misdemeanor defendants, especially those who did not complete MHC, had increases. We discuss why MHC supervision may sometimes have a negative effect and offer recommendations on how courts might modify supervision.
    Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research 06/2014; 42(3). DOI:10.1007/s10488-014-0572-2 · 3.44 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "These findings also applied to defendants who had not successfully completed the court, suggesting that even non-completion exposure to the court was effective at reducing recidivism rates in this population. Another study by Steadman et al. (2005) has shown that while defendants who participated in mental health court were arrested more often for technical probation violations, those who were eligible, but did not participate in mental health court, were likely to be arrested for more serious crimes. Again, this finding may be explained by the increased amount of scrutiny in mental health court in that defendants in mental health court are seen much more frequently than those in traditional court proceedings and are continuously monitored by members of their treatment team. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Previous research has shown that mental health courts have been successful in reducing the rates of recidivism among mentally ill offenders. However, none of these studies, to date, have examined exactly what aspects of the courts reduce these rates of recidivism and what makes them successful. The current study utilized a sample of 291 mentally ill criminal offenders participating in a mental health court to examine whether those participants who were addressed by and communicated with the judge had a reduction in recidivism rates and the severity of new charges in comparison to those who did not. The hypotheses regarding greater judge-defendant communication and recidivism were not supported. This suggests that communication in and of itself is not sufficient to reduce recidivism. Future research of a qualitative nature is essential to identify if the frequency, tone, and valence of the communication results in improved outcomes. In addition, these results may indicate a necessity for more stringent training and guidelines for the maintenance of Mental Health Courts. Results of the current study suggested differences between genders, such that females were spoken to by the judge more frequently than were men.
    International Journal of Law and Psychiatry 12/2013; 37(3). DOI:10.1016/j.ijlp.2013.11.023 · 1.19 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "Some MHCs will only accepts persons with Axis I disorders. In a recent evaluation of seven MHCs, Steadman et al. (2005) found that 48% of referrals had been diagnosed with schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, or bipolar disorder. Further, having a serious mental illness was positively predictive of MHC acceptance. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The number of mental health courts (MHCs) is steadily increasing. Although the courts are voluntary, it is unknown whether decisions to enter MHCs are made knowingly and intelligently. However, the ability to make these decisions is important given that MHCs are informal (and thus may lack built-in safeguards against constitutional violations) and given their rate of growth. Relevant research on other types of legal competencies suggests there may a substantial number of MHC participants who do not fully comprehend court processes and requirements. Furthermore, the level of comprehension at entry may predict future success or failure in the court. Thus, for both legal and practical reasons, the issue of MHC comprehension among its participants is critical. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2012 APA, all rights reserved)
    Psychology Public Policy and Law 11/2005; 11(4):605-619. DOI:10.1037/1076-8971.11.4.605 · 1.93 Impact Factor
Show more