Effects of a hospitalist model on elderly patients with hip fracture

University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, United States
Archives of Internal Medicine (Impact Factor: 13.25). 04/2005; 165(7):796-801. DOI: 10.1001/archinte.165.7.796
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Hospitalists' increased role in perioperative medicine allows for examination of their effects on surgical patients. This study examined the effects of a hospitalist service created to medically manage elderly patients with hip fracture.
During a 2-year historical cohort study of 466 patients 65 years or older admitted for surgical repair of hip fracture, we examined outcomes 1 year prior to and subsequent to the change from the standard to the hospitalist model.
The mean (SD) time to surgery (38 [47] vs 25 [53] hours; P<.001), time from surgery to dismissal (9 [8] vs 7 [5] days; P = .04), and length of stay (10.6 [9] vs 8.4 [6] days; P<.001) were shorter in the hospitalist group. Predictors of shorter time to surgery were care by the hospitalist group (P = .002), older age (P = .01), and fall as the mechanism of fracture (P<.001), while American Society of Anesthesia scores of 3 and 4 were associated with increased time to surgery (P<.001). Receiving care by the hospitalist group (P<.001) and diagnosis of delirium (P<.001) were associated with increased chance of earlier dismissal, while admission to the intensive care unit decreased this chance (P<.001). Diagnosis of delirium was more frequent in the hospitalist group (74 [32.2%] of 230 vs 42 [17.8%] of 236; P<.001). There were no differences in inpatient deaths or 30-day readmission rates.
In elderly patients with hip fracture, a hospitalist model decreased time to surgery, time from surgery to dismissal, and length of stay without adversely affecting inpatient deaths or 30-day readmission rates.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Comanagement of surgical patients is occurring more commonly among adult and pediatric patients. These systems of care can vary according to institution type, comanagement structure, and type of patient. Comanagement can impact quality, safety, and costs of care. We review these implications for pediatric surgical patients. Journal of Hospital Medicine 2014. © 2014 Society of Hospital Medicine
    Journal of Hospital Medicine 11/2014; 9(11). DOI:10.1002/jhm.2266 · 2.08 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Medical comanagement of surgical patients by pediatric hospital medicine providers has become increasingly common. Subjectively, the comanagement model is superior to more traditional consultative models because of the anticipatory preventive care and coordination hospitalists provide to patients and hospital colleagues. Although some studies have demonstrated the value of the comanagement model in adults and children, others have failed to do so. The coming years are both exciting and challenging for this emerging field as it attempts to sustain its early progress and define its future in pediatric hospital medicine.
    Pediatric Clinics of North America 08/2014; 61(4). DOI:10.1016/j.pcl.2014.04.002 · 2.20 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Although advances in science are important, changes in population structure and developments in health policy have equally critical roles in shaping the future of anesthesia practice. Therefore, it is important for anesthesiologists to be aware of these trends and their implications. As in other industrialized nations, population aging implies that patients presenting for elective surgery in future decades will be older and sicker. Nevertheless, in part for economic reasons, the fraction of surgeries performed in the ambulatory environment will continue to increase. Furthermore, the gradual elimination of fee-for-service care in favor of bundled payments will place additional risk on providers to prevent costly complications. In the USA, the American Society of Anesthesiologists has offered the 'surgical home' as a new model for perioperative care delivery in which the anesthesiologist serves as the coordinator of care from the preoperative through the postoperative phase. The purpose is not only to increase patient-centeredness but also to find opportunities for cost savings and increased efficiencies. Global demographic and health policy trends are calling for new models of healthcare delivery. Anesthesiologists have much experience in the fields of risk assessment and quality improvement. They are well positioned to become leaders in the perioperative care environment of the future.
    Current opinion in anaesthesiology 04/2014; DOI:10.1097/ACO.0000000000000064 · 2.53 Impact Factor