The longitudinal effects of work-family conflict and positive spillover on depressive symptoms among dual-earner couples.

Department of Psychology, Portland State University, OR 97207, USA.
Journal of Occupational Health Psychology (Impact Factor: 2.07). 05/2005; 10(2):138-54. DOI: 10.1037/1076-8998.10.2.138
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT This study assessed longitudinal and cross-sectional relationships between work-family conflict, positive spillover, and depression in a national sample of 234 dual-earner couples. The authors also assessed crossover effects (i.e., the transmission of emotions, affect, or stress from 1 member of a dyad to another) of work-family conflict and positive spillover on spouses' depression. Two general findings of the study were that (a) positive spillover has a stronger impact on depression than does work-family conflict, and (b) the effects of spouses' positive spillover were more strongly related to decreased depression than were the effects of one's own positive spillover. Significant longitudinal effects were related to the crossover of positive spillover on decreased spouse depression.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The purpose was to investigate the influence of couple emotional intimacy on job perceptions (job concerns and job rewards) and work–family conflict (both work-to-family conflict and family-to-work conflict). Data on 567 couples came from a subset of the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development’s Study of Early Child Care taken when the target children were fifth graders. The researchers used an actor–partner interdependence model (APIM) to examine mothers’ and fathers’ couple emotional intimacy and its influence on self- and partner perceptions of job concerns and job rewards as well as work-to-family conflict and family-to-work conflict. Both mothers’ and fathers’ couple emotional intimacy predicted fewer job concerns, more job rewards, less work-to-family conflict, and less family-to-work conflict for her- and himself. No partner effects were found in the model.
    Family and Consumer Sciences Research Journal. 06/2012; 40(4).
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Traditionally, research on the work-family interface has focused on the negative and conflicting aspects of this balance. Nevertheless, more recently, the advantages and benefits of multiple role occupation have been addressed. This paper analyses the main psychological mechanism of the work-family interface: the spillover effect. Spillover dimensions (positive and negative), directions, as well as variables associated to each type of spillover are discussed. We argue that a multidimensional approach to this issue will allow for a more complete understanding of the work-family relationship, which in turn will enable the creation of family-friendly measures directed at reducing negative interferences between work and family as well as directed at enhancing positive linkages.
    Psicologia Teoria e Pesquisa 06/2012; 28(2):235-244.
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Purpose – Despite the abundance of dispositional affect, work-family, and leadership research, little has been done to integrate these literatures. Based primarily on conservation of resources theory, which suggests individuals seek to acquire and maintain resources to reduce stress, the purpose of this paper is to provide an empirical examination of the relationships between leader dispositional affect, leader work-family spillover, and leadership. Design/methodology/approach – Survey data were collected from a diverse sample of managers from a broad set of occupational groups (e.g. financial, government, library). Regression and Monte Carlo procedures were used to estimate model direct and indirect effects. Findings – The results indicate that dispositional affect is a strong predictor of both work-family spillover and leadership. Further, the relationship between negative/positive affect and leadership was partially mediated by work-family conflict/enrichment. Research limitations/implications – Data were cross-sectional self-report, which does not allow for causal interpretations and may increase the risk of common method bias. Practical implications – This study helps address why leaders experience both stress and benefits from multiple work and family demands, as well as why leaders engage in particular forms of leadership, such as passive and active leadership behaviors. Originality/value – This study provides the first empirical examination of leader's dispositional affect, work-family spillover, and leadership, and suggests that manager's dispositional affect and work-family spillover have meaningful relationships with leader behavior across situations. Within the last few decades, research on work-family conflict and enrichment has received a considerable amount of attention and has broken down traditional barriers between work and nonwork environments (Carlson et al., 2010; Kossek and Michel, 2011). The breadth of the work-family literature currently includes numerous work and family antecedents such as communication technologies, culture, stressors, and perceptions of organizational and supervisor support (Boswell and Olson-Buchanan, 2007; Major et al., 2008; Michel et al., 2010), and outcomes such as job performance, job satisfaction, and withdrawal behaviors (Gilboa et al., 2008; Hammer et al., 2003; Michel and Hargis, 2008). Surprisingly, despite the broad scope of the work-family literature (cf. Eby et al., 2005), and the conceptual links between work-family and leadership
    Leadership & Organization Development Journal 01/2014; 35(5):410-428. · 0.63 Impact Factor


Available from
May 17, 2014