Article

Use of physical restraints in nursing homes: current practice in Singapore.

Geriatric Medicine Unit, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore.
Annals of the Academy of Medicine, Singapore (Impact Factor: 1.36). 03/2005; 34(2):158-62.
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT One of the indicators of quality care in nursing homes is the proper use of physical restraints. Restraints have been associated with multiple complications, such as pressure ulcers, incontinence and immobility. The aim of our study was to assess the indication, use and complications related to physical restraints in Singapore nursing homes.
All residents aged >65 years old from 3 nursing homes were included in the study. A geriatrician reviewed the medical records of all elderly residents on restraints. Nursing staff interviews were also done to assess their knowledge regarding restraint use. A brief medical record review was also done for the elderly residents without restraints.
Out of 390 elderly residents, 91 were on physical restraints. The mean age of these residents were 80.1 years; 67% were female, 90.1% were Chinese and 82.4% belonged to functional category IV. Both urinary and faecal incontinence were observed in 97.8% of residents. Forty-six (50.5%) residents had no documented indication for restraints. It was noted that 20 (22%) residents were restrained to prevent dislodgement of the feeding tube, 17 (18.7%) were restrained to prevent falls and 8 (8.8%) were restrained for agitation. There were documented trials of removal of restraints for only 21 (23.1%) residents. Alternative approaches, such as diversion technique, were used for 31 (34.1%) residents to avoid restraint use.
Our study revealed a high rate of restraint use in the nursing homes. A restraint protocol should be available in every nursing home, requiring physician approval for the long-term application of physical restraints and intermittent reviews by physicians to assess the continued need for restraints.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
286 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To analyse and to summarise factors associated with nursing home residents' characteristics which could lead to physical restraint, and to investigate the consequences of physical restraint use for this population. Even though the application of physical restraint is highly controversial, prevalence rates show that it is a common intervention in nursing homes. Residents' characteristics seem to be important to predict the use of physical restraint. Evidence suggests that restrained nursing home residents may have physical and psychological disadvantages as a consequence of being restrained. A systematic literature research involving the databases PubMed, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, ISI Web of Science and Cochrane Library was carried out for articles published from January 2005-November 2011. Nine Studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria and the quality assessment. Restrained residents had low activities of daily living (ADL) scores and severe cognitive impairment. Residents with low cognitive status and serious mobility impairments were at high risk to be restrained, as well as residents with previous fall and/or fracture. Repeated verbal and physical agitation was found to be positively associated with restraint use. Possible consequences of physical restraint were as follows: lower cognitive and ADL performance, higher walking dependence, furthermore falls, pressure ulcers, urinary and faecal incontinence. This systematic literature review reveals notable resident-related factors for physical restraint use. The consequences of restraint seem to negatively influence residents' physical and psychological well-being. Physical restraint seems to be an important risk factor for residents' further health problems. Resident's characteristics appear to be decisive factors for the use of physical restraint. Nurses need a high level of expertise and competence in evaluating the individual residents' situation and deciding further steps, with respect for the autonomy and dignity of the person.
    Journal of Clinical Nursing 10/2013; · 1.32 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Dementia is a priority area for all countries as populations age and dementia prevalence increases. The use of physical restraint is a possible clinical practice for persons with dementia across settings when behaviours indicate a perceived need. Indeed, this may be the first choice in practice, occurring in part because of lack of education, safety concerns, perceived costs and staffing issues. This article reviews the literature on the issues surrounding, and use of, physical restraint for people with dementia, highlighting the rationales for use and the benefits and barriers to physical restraint. Recommendations include the importance of education and policy to reduce or eliminate physical restraint of persons with dementia to overcome identified barriers at the individual, cultural and organizational levels. An educational programme from the literature review is proposed specific to the reduction or elimination of physical restraint.
    Dementia 01/2013; 12(1):93-110.
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Objetivo. Explorar la circunstancias que rodean el uso de restricciones físicas en un centro geriátrico de larga estancia. Métodos. Se utiliza una muestra de conveniencia de una unidad en la que existe una utilización extensiva de la restricción física. Identificamos su uso mediante observación directa, y con posterioridad revisamos las historias clínicas de todos los que estaban restringidos recogiendo datos acerca del uso de este procedimiento. Resultados. La edad media de la población es de 66 años. El 84% presenta dependencia funcional severa y el 67,5% deterioro cognitivo moderado o severo. La restricción física es utilizada en el 93 % de los pacientes. El 64 % lleva utilizándola más de un año. En el 60 % de los casos no figuran datos en la historia clínica acerca de su uso; tampoco parece haberse hecho evaluación periódica en más de dos tercios de los ancianos. Por último, en la mayoría no se constata la existencia de un plan de cuidados específicos. Conclusiones. Los resultados muestran que estos dispositivos no son utilizados de manera puntual sino más bien de manera rutinaria, lo que corroboraría la idea de que una vez que se comienza a utilizar una sujeción en una anciano probablemente continuará usándose de manera indefinida: "una vez restringido, siempre restringido". Mientras otros procedimientos clínicos son registrados de manera precisa, todo aquello que tiene que ver con la restricción física apenas se refleja en la historia. La ausencia de evaluaciones periódicas, unidas a la escasez de planes de cuidados específicos, podrían indicar que, para los profesionales, esta no es una intervención lo suficientemente importante como para ser documentada. De forma probable su utilización pueda deberse más a la repetición de un modelo basado más en falsas creencias que en evidencias científicas. Su uso debería ser analizado desde un punto de vista crítico, aplicándose únicamente cuando hayan fracasado otras alternativas y los beneficios sean mayores que los riesgos potenciales. En definitiva, los datos obtenidos indican un uso excesivo de la restricción física y presencia de prácticas que deben ser catalogadas de rutinarias.
    55 Congreso de la Sociedad Española de Geriatría y Gerontología; 06/2013

Full-text

Download
5 Downloads
Available from