Article

Prevalence of indoor tanning use in Minnesota, 2002

University of Minnesota Duluth, Duluth, Minnesota, United States
Archives of Dermatology (Impact Factor: 4.31). 05/2005; 141(4):523-4. DOI: 10.1001/archderm.141.4.523
Source: PubMed
0 Followers
 · 
56 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Aim Sunbed use can have severe health consequences, e.g. skin cancer, especially for children and adolescents. Therefore, our aim was to quantify how many adolescents use tanning beds despite a legal ban in Germany. In addition, we aimed at identifying characteristics of users and at analyzing reasons for use and user behavior. Subjects and methods The nationwide representative SUN-Study 2012 included a subgroup of 518 minors (14–17 years). Besides calculating the prevalence, we used bivariate statistics to identify user groups and to compare minors with adults in terms of reasons for use, place of last use, and obtained advisory service. Results Overall, 8.7 % of minors had ever used a sunbed; 5.2 % used it during the last 12 months. Out of these, nearly a half was not aware of the legal ban for minors. Users were mainly smokers, had darker skin, and a migration background. Compared to adults, minors were more likely to use unsupervised sunbeds and were less frequently advised by service personnel. Conclusion The data showed that minors use tanning beds, although there is a legal ban in Germany. The circumvention of the ban and the widespread use of unsupervised sunbeds underline the importance of education and further legal requirements.
    Journal of Public Health 10/2013; 21(5). DOI:10.1007/s10389-013-0570-y · 2.06 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Minnesota and Massachusetts require parental permission, for persons younger than 16 or 18 years of age, respectively, for indoor tanning. This report examines business practices and characteristics associated with sales of indoor tanning to underage girls. Fifteen-year-old girls tried to purchase an ultraviolet tanning session in 200 indoor tanning businesses in the Minneapolis-St Paul and Boston areas without parental consent. Business characteristics were recorded. Later, businesses were interviewed by telephone about their facilities and practices. Eighty-one percent of businesses sold a session to an underaged buyer on at least one of two tries. Illegal purchases did not differ by state. Businesses least likely to sell were larger, dedicated to indoor tanning, required employee certification, and had a minimum age of sale for their business. However, businesses in each of these categories still sold tanning sessions to underaged adolescents at 44% to 62% of the visits. Employees who requested parental consent or age identification almost never sold a session. Businesses in Minnesota and Massachusetts only were included. Minnesota and Massachusetts laws specifying a minimum age of sale for indoor tanning are ineffective.
    Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology 01/2007; 55(6):962-7. DOI:10.1016/j.jaad.2006.06.036 · 5.00 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To develop items to measure indoor tanning and sunless tanning that can be used to monitor trends in population surveys or to assess changes in behavior in intervention studies. A group of experts on indoor tanning convened in December 2005, as part of a national workshop to review the state of the evidence, define measurement issues, and develop items for ever tanned indoors, lifetime frequency, and past-year frequency for both indoor tanning and sunless tanning. Each item was subsequently assessed via in-person interviews for clarity, specificity, recall, and appropriateness of wording. Universities in Tennessee and Virginia, a medical center in Massachusetts, and a high school in New Hampshire. The study population comprised 24 adults and 7 adolescents. Participants understood indoor tanning to represent tanning from beds, booths, and lamps that emit artificial UV radiation, rather than sunless tanning, even though both can be obtained from a booth. Two items were required to distinguish manually applied from booth-applied sunless tanning products. Frequency of use was easier for participants to recall in the past year than for a lifetime. While indoor tanning items may be recommended with confidence for clarity, sunless tanning items require additional testing. Memory aids may be necessary to facilitate recall of lifetime use of nonsolar tanning. In addition, studies that assess reliability and validity of these measures are needed. Since study participants were primarily young and female, testing in other populations should also be considered.
    Archives of dermatology 03/2008; 144(2):225-30. DOI:10.1001/archdermatol.2007.45 · 4.31 Impact Factor