Variations in performance characteristics of commercial enzyme immunoassay kits for detection of antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies: what is the optimal cut off?

Department of Rheumatology, University of Schleswig-Holstein Campus Lübeck and Rheumaklinik Bad Bramstedt, Germany.
Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases (Impact Factor: 9.11). 01/2006; 64(12):1773-9. DOI: 10.1136/ard.2005.035279
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Previous studies have shown considerable variation in diagnostic performance of enzyme linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) for measuring antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies (ANCA) specific for proteinase 3 (PR3) and myeloperoxidase (MPO).
To analyse the performance characteristics of different commercially available direct ANCA ELISA kits.
ELISA kits for detecting PR3-ANCA and MPO-ANCA from 11 manufacturers were evaluated. Serum samples were taken from patients with Wegener's granulomatosis (15), microscopic polyangiitis (15), other vasculitides (10), and controls (40).
were compared with data obtained by indirect immunofluorescence (IFT). The diagnostic performance of the tests was analysed and compared by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis.Results: Applying the manufacturers' cut off resulted in great variation in sensitivity of the commercial PR3-ANCA kits for diagnosing Wegener's granulomatosis (ranging from 13.3% to 66.7%), and of the MPO-ANCA kits for diagnosing microscopic polyangiitis (ranging from 26.7% to 66.7%). Specificities were relatively constant (from 96.0% to 100%). IFT was superior to all ELISAs (C-ANCA for Wegener's granulomatosis: sensitivity 73.3%, specificity 98%; P-ANCA for microscopic polyangiitis: sensitivity 86.7%, specificity 98%). The sensitivities of PR3-ANCA and MPO-ANCA ELISA kits were increased by lowering the cut off values. This reduced specificity but increased overall diagnostic performance.
The low sensitivity of some commercial kits reflects the high cut off levels recommended rather than methodological problems with the assays. Comparative analyses using sera from well characterised patients may help identify optimum cut off levels of commercial ANCA ELISA tests, resulting in better comparability of results among assays from different manufacturers.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Abstract Background: PR3-ANCA, the serological marker of granulomatosis with polyangiitis (GPA), is usually detected by immunometric assays, with purified PR3 directly coated onto the solid-phase. Novel methods for PR3-ANCA detection have been developed to improve the performance of traditional PR3-ANCA specific assays, but little is known about their diagnostic performance in real-life clinical settings. This study aimed to compare the performance of nine different commercial PR3-ANCA specific assays, including traditional and newer ones, for the diagnosis of GPA. Methods: The evaluated assays for PR3-ANCA detection were representative of the first, second, and third generation tests (direct, capture and anchor assays, respectively). A third-generation assay employing both human and recombinant PR3 was also evaluated. The study population consisted of 55 GPA patients, 175 disease controls (representing most diseases in differential diagnosis with primary small-vessel vasculitis) including 52 with microscopic polyangiitis, and 20 healthy subjects. We performed the primary evaluation of test sensitivity using cut-off points which provided adequate and identical specificity for each test. Results: Although specificity and area under the ROC curve did not differ significantly between the different assays, substantial differences in sensitivity at 98%-specificity were found in some instances (p<0.001). Compared to first generation direct PR3-ANCA specific assays, some of the second and third generation tests increased the positive predictive value (PPV) for GPA diagnosis. Conclusions: Some of the newer PR3-ANCA specific assays have better PPV than traditional ones.
    Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine 06/2013; · 3.01 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Detection of antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies (ANCAs) is a well-established diagnostic test used to evaluate suspected necrotizing vasculitis of small blood vessels. Conditions associated with these antibodies, collectively referred to as ANCA-associated vasculitides, include granulomatosis with polyangiitis (formerly known as Wegener granulomatosis), microscopic polyangiitis, and eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (formerly known as Churg-Strauss syndrome). The diagnostic utility of ANCA testing depends on the type of assay performed and on the clinical setting. Most laboratories worldwide use standard indirect immunofluorescence tests (IFT) to screen for ANCA and then confirm positive IFT results with antigen-specific tests for proteinase 3 (PR3) and myeloperoxidase (MPO). Developments such as automated image analysis of immunofluorescence patterns, so-called third-generation PR3-ANCA and MPO-ANCA ELISA, and multiplex technology have improved the detection of ANCAs. However, challenges in routine clinical practice remain, including methodological aspects of IFT performance, the diverse antigen-specific assays available, the diagnostic value of testing in clinical settings and the prognostic value of serial ANCA monitoring in the prediction of disease relapse. This Review summarizes the available data on ANCA testing, discusses the usefulness of the various ANCA assays and advises on the clinical indications for the use of ANCA testing.
    Nature Reviews Rheumatology 06/2014; · 9.75 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The timely diagnosis of vasculopathies, such as granulomatosis with polyangiitis, has important implications for the favorable clinical outcome of these diseases. In the clinical setting, autoantibodies to proteinase 3 (Pr3) and myeloperoxidase (MPO) have been shown to be valuable adjuncts to an early and accurate diagnosis. The sensitive and specific detection of anti-Pr3 and anti-MPO was shown using a point of care device that employed rapid Lateral Flow Technologies. The validation of the lateral flow assay (LFA) was performed with serum samples collected in two Reference Laboratories and showed excellent results that were comparable to widely accepted and used ELISA. The advantage of the LFA is the flexibility to be used as an economical, point of care diagnostic device, features that are especially important for an early and accurate diagnosis and the prompt initiation of appropriate treatment so as to avoid inevitable development of undue complications of these diseases such as disseminated organ involvement, e.g. renal failure.
    Journal of immunological methods 11/2013; · 2.35 Impact Factor


Available from