Subjective self-control and behavioural impulsivity coexist in anorexia nervosa.

Department of Psychology, University of Greenwich, Eltham, London SE9 2UG, UK.
Eating Behaviors (Impact Factor: 1.58). 07/2005; 6(3):221-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.eatbeh.2004.11.002
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Anorexia nervosa (AN) has been associated with impulse regulation problems. This study investigated subjective and behavioural impulsivity in women with anorexia nervosa (n=15) and a control group (n=16).
A self-report measure (the impulsiveness, venturesomeness, and empathy questionnaire; I(7)) and two behavioural measures (a continuous performance task [CPT]; and a novel risk taking measure [Bets 16]) of impulsivity were used along with the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI).
The AN group had elevated BDI scores and lower self-reported impulsiveness and venturesomeness scores, but they also displayed impulsive behaviour on the CPT (more errors of commission with faster reaction times).
The coexistence, in AN, of self-reported self-control and behavioural impulsivity indicates that the relationship between impulsivity and disordered eating in AN is more complex than previously recognised and supports the view that self-awareness in AN is low.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: How executive functioning affects delayed verbal recall in AN has never been tested. We investigated the influence of speed of information processing (SIP) and inhibition on delayed verbal recall in females with AN.Methods Measures of SIP and inhibition from 35 females with AN were analyzed using hierarchical multiple regression after controlling for age, depressive symptomatology and body mass index. Each predictor was evaluated using structure coefficients, common variance and dominance weights.ResultsThe combination of measures of SIP and inhibition accounted for almost 80% of the variance on the delayed recall of the story recall task. When the rest of the variables were partialled out, SIP and inhibition accounted for more than 50% of the variance.Conclusions As it occurs with visuospatial abilities in AN, basic cognitive abilities such as speed of information processing and cognitive inhibition may affect other cognitive functions such as delayed verbal memory regardless of immediate recall. These findings may help interpret performance on cognitive tests in future research.
    Eating Behaviors 11/2014; · 1.58 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Literature on impulsivity regularly claims inhibitory control deficits underlie impulsive behavior. The current study investigated whether taxing inhibitory control will increase reflection (decision making under conditions of uncertainty), temporal (delay of gratification), and motor impulsivity (behavioral disinhibition). Inhibitory control was challenged, via a random letter generation task presented during responding to three impulsivity measures: the Information Sampling Task (IST), Single Key Impulsivity Paradigm, and the Stop Signal Task (SST). Participants (n = 33) were assigned to the inhibitory control challenging (experimental) condition, or to a control condition in which inhibitory control was not challenged. The SST was affected by the inhibitory control challenge: participants in the experimental condition displayed increased motor impulsivity, evidenced in longer stop signal reaction times (SSRTs) compared to the control group. The manipulation did not affect reflection- or temporal- impulsivity measures. These data support the suggestion that the mechanisms underlying the motor subtype of impulsivity are dissociable from the temporal and reflection subtypes, and that engagement of inhibitory control is not necessary to prevent impulsive decision making.
    Experimental Psychology 04/2013; · 2.22 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Preliminary evidence suggests that when individuals believe that they will have to exert self-control in the near future, their performance on an intervening self-control task suffers so that limited self-control resources are conserved for later use (Muraven, Shmueli, & Burkley, 2006). The current research sought to clarify whether conservation is enacted as a proactive strategy, before resources have actually been taxed. To test this, participants who anticipated a future self-control task were given the opportunity to avoid exerting self-control in the present. Inconsistent with a proactive account of conservation, participants did not choose to avoid self-control tasks. This suggests that when facing multiple self-control demands, individuals likely do not recognize the need to save resources until after exerting self-control. People must exert control over their impulses and urges to successfully navigate the situations that they encounter in everyday life (Baumeister, Heatherton, & Tice, 1994). Multiple times throughout the day, individuals are faced with temptations and diversions that threaten the attainment of their long-term goals. However, the ability to resist these temptations is not endless; the exertion of self-control appears to deplete a limited resource or strength, making subsequent attempts at self-control more likely to fail (Muraven, Tice, & Baumeister, 1998). Therefore, in order to successfully guide behavior towards the attainment of long-term goals, it is necessary to allocate self-control resources so that they are available for when they are most needed. Recent research has offered preliminary evidence that the judicious management of self-control strength may be possible. When individuals anticipate an ensuing need for self-control, their performance on an intervening self-control task decreases so that resources are conserved for the future (Muraven et al., 2006). However, it is not clear if individuals pursue conservation strategies proactively, before they have begun to exert any self-control, or only reactively, once they have already begun to expend self-control. One way to clarify this issue is to examine participants' preference for current self-control tasks when they know that they will need to exert self-control in the near future. If participants choose to avoid self-control tasks, it would suggest that they recognize the need to conserve resources even before they have begun to exert any self-control. This may have important implications for how individuals choose to exert self-control in situations in which they face multiple self-control demands.


Available from
Jan 16, 2015