Epilepsy after the Decade of the Brain: Misunderstandings, challenges, and opportunities

Department of Neurology and Center for Neuroscience, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA.
Epilepsy & Behavior (Impact Factor: 2.26). 06/2005; 6(3):296-302. DOI: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2005.02.009
Source: PubMed
4 Reads
  • Source
    • "The evolving tradition of the annual Hoyer Lecture is to use the occasion to take stock of where we are in the world of epilepsy, and where we may be headed. Indeed, in 2004, Tom Sutula, in his lecture entitled " Epilepsy After the Decade of the Brain: Misunderstandings, Challenges, and Opportunities, " explored some of the reasons why epilepsy is challenging for healthcare professionals and scientists and how it is often misunderstood by the public (Sutula, 2005). The following year, Jeff Noebels spoke of " New Tools to Cure Epilepsy: Genes, Pixels, Patterns and Prevention " (Noebels, 2006). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This paper, based on the 4th Annual Hoyer Lecture presented at the 2006 annual meeting of the American Epilepsy Society, first provides a general view of the current limitations in therapies aimed at achieving the goal of "no seizures, no side effects" for patients living with epilepsy. Some of the seminal discoveries in epilepsy research over the past 100 years are then reviewed, with an emphasis on the pivotal role of basic and clinical/translational science in leading the way to new and effective means for diagnosing and treating for epilepsy. The paper concludes with a view of the future course of epilepsy research. Scientific advances will increasingly rely on the collaboration of multidisciplinary teams of researchers using the analytic and storage capabilities of machines, and linked together by communication tools such as the Internet and related technologies.
    Epilepsia 02/2008; 49(1):1-7. DOI:10.1111/j.1528-1167.2007.01309.x · 4.57 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This paper treats the study of on-chip temperature compensation of a broad-band UHF VCO. Analysis, design and evaluation of IC oscillators are described. Excellent agreement between simulation and measurement is demonstrated. The frequency deviation drift specification over a 25°C temperature range has been reduced to <0.5 MHz within the frequency range of 470~930 MHz
    Microwave Symposium Digest, 1997., IEEE MTT-S International; 07/1997
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Although traumatic brain injury is a major cause of symptomatic epilepsy, the mechanism by which it leads to recurrent seizures is unknown. An animal model of posttraumatic epilepsy that reliably reproduces the clinical sequelae of human traumatic brain injury is essential to identify the molecular and cellular substrates of posttraumatic epileptogenesis, and perform preclinical screening of new antiepileptogenic compounds. We studied the electrophysiologic, behavioral, and structural features of posttraumatic epilepsy induced by severe, non-penetrating lateral fluid-percussion brain injury in rats. Data from two independent experiments indicated that 43% to 50% of injured animals developed epilepsy, with a latency period between 7 weeks to 1 year. Mean seizure frequency was 0.3+/-0.2 seizures per day and mean seizure duration was 113+/-46 s. Behavioral seizure severity increased over time in the majority of animals. Secondarily-generalized seizures comprised an average of 66+/-37% of all seizures. Mossy fiber sprouting was increased in the ipsilateral hippocampus of animals with posttraumatic epilepsy compared with those subjected to traumatic brain injury without epilepsy. Stereologic cell counts indicated a loss of dentate hilar neurons ipsilaterally following traumatic brain injury. Our data suggest that posttraumatic epilepsy occurs with a frequency of 40% to 50% after severe non-penetrating fluid-percussion brain injury in rats, and that the lateral fluid percussion model can serve as a clinically-relevant tool for pathophysiologic and preclinical studies.
    Neuroscience 07/2006; 140(2):685-97. DOI:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2006.03.012 · 3.36 Impact Factor
Show more

Similar Publications