Physical disability contributes to caregiver stress in dementia caregivers.

School of Medicine and Pharmacology, University of Western Australia, Fremantle Hospital, P. O. Box 480, Fremantle, Western Australia 6959, Australia.
The Journals of Gerontology Series A Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences (Impact Factor: 4.98). 04/2005; 60(3):345-9. DOI: 10.1093/gerona/60.3.345
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Previous findings of studies on the impact of physical illness on caregiver health have been inconsistent. The authors wanted to determine whether physical disability, as determined by the SF-12 survey that provides information on both physical and mental health problems, contributes to caregiver stress.
The authors interviewed 91 primary caregivers (aged 38-85 years) of persons with dementia who had been referred by their family physicians for the first time for formal support services or memory evaluation. Caregivers completed the SF-12 version of the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form Health Survey that generates Mental Component Summary (MCS) and Physical Component Summary (PCS) scores and reported on caregiver stress and concurrent medical conditions and medications.
Most caregivers reported stress (76.9%), having medical conditions (72.4%), or taking medications (67%). The MCS but not the PCS scores were significantly lower than community norms, indicating an excess of disability due to mental health problems. Nevertheless, 40.7% had PCS scores indicating some degree of physical disability. Using multiple logistic regression analysis, PCS scores but not the presence of medical problems were independently associated with caregiver stress.
Chronic disability as assessed by SF-12 PCS scores is independently associated with caregiver stress. These data suggest that caregivers of persons with dementia should be assessed for disabling physical conditions and mental health problems. In addition, reducing the impact of physical disability could ameliorate caregiver stress.


Available from: David G Bruce, Sep 25, 2014
1 Follower
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: We have studied the physiological characteristics of the general working capacity of 45 persons with ages between 80 and 94. We have found that 13% of the respondents have preserved the general working performance. The other 15.6% of the subjects have developed the pathology of the musculoskeletal system that limited the volume of their motion but still allowed to perform certain jobs. Studying the physiological and professional anamnesis parameters showed that about 70% of the “fourth age” people had significant reduction of self-service and total working capacity. People with higher level of body mass index had better functional indices of physical and mental performance. We have defined the principal changes of the aging persons’ general working capacity, particularly their physiological, rehabilitation, and gerontechnological characteristics.
    10/2012; 1(4). DOI:10.1134/S207905701104014X
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The burden of patients and their caregivers after outpatient surgery has not been fully examined. The number of outpatient surgeries has dramatically increased in the last several years, particularly in the orthopaedic sector. Patients undergoing outpatient orthopaedic procedures may be expected to have more postdischarge pain than those undergoing nonorthopaedic outpatient procedures. In light of this, assessment of patient and caregiver expectations and actual burden after discharge is of importance. We assessed the impact of outpatient surgery on recovery of patients and their caregivers in the postoperative period by determining (1) expected versus actual time to resume daily activities, including work; (2) expected versus actual recovery at 7 and 30 days postoperatively; and (3) the number of caregivers that felt emotional or physical disturbances from caring for outpatients. Forty-four adult patients undergoing outpatient surgical procedures and their primary caregivers were enrolled in this prospective survey study, of which 30% were orthopaedic patients. Surveys assessing postoperative recovery were given to patients at six time points, on Postoperative Days 0 to 3, 7, and 30. Surveys assessing the burden of informal caregiving were given to each patient's primary caregiver at four time points, on Postoperative Days 1 to 3 and 7. The enrollment rate was 79% (44 enrolled of 56 approached) and the survey response rate was 100% for patients and 93% (41 of 44) for caregivers. We found that 16 of 44 patients (36%) needed more time than originally anticipated to resume their daily activities and three of 29 patients (10%) needed more time off from work than originally anticipated. Patients were approximately 66% and 88% fully recovered 7 and 30 days after surgery, respectively. The primary caregivers noted disturbances in emotional (nine of 43, 21%) and physical (17 of 43, 40%) aspects of their daily lives while providing care for patients. Our surveyed patients were from multiple surgical services; however, our results may be generalized to an orthopaedic population, although they may underestimate actual results for this population given their generally higher pain scores. Patients may take longer to recover from outpatient surgery than previously recognized. As increased pain and prolonged recovery may be associated with increased caregiver burden, these data are of particular significance to the outpatient orthopaedic surgical population. Informal caregiving after outpatient surgery may be an unrecognized physical and psychologic burden and may have a significant societal impact. Level II, prognostic study. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
    Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research 09/2013; 472(5). DOI:10.1007/s11999-013-3270-6 · 2.88 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Gesundheitsförderung und Prävention im Sinne eines komplementären planvollen Vorgehens zur Stärkung von gesundheitsbezogenen Ressourcen einerseits und einer Reduktion von Risiken andererseits sind klassische Kernbereiche von Public Health. Wird der Auftrag von Public Health darin gesehen, den bestmöglichen Gesundheitszustand für die größtmögliche Anzahl von Individuen zu erreichen bzw. zu erhalten, kommen nur Strategien und Maßnahmen in Betracht, die soziodemografische und Merkmale der Sozialstruktur berücksichtigen. Denn bekanntlich hängen soziale und gesundheitliche Ungleichheit eng miteinander zusammen. Für die Gruppe älterer Menschen gilt es, sowohl horizontale als auch vertikale Dimensionen sozialer Ungleichheit einzubeziehen (vgl. für einen kurzen Abriss zu Public Health auch in Bezug auf den Altersstrukturwandel: Kolominsky- Rabas 2006).