Factors Associated with Pathological Dissociation in the General Population

Department of Psychiatry, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Northern Savo, Finland
Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry (Impact Factor: 3.77). 06/2005; 39(5):387-94. DOI: 10.1111/j.1440-1614.2005.01586.x
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT This study assessed the prevalence of pathological dissociation in the general population, and the relationship between pathological dissociation and sociodemographic and several psychiatric variables.
The stratified population sample consisted of 2001 subjects. The study questionnaires included the Dissociative Experiences Scale, the Dissociative Experiences Scale-Taxon, the Toronto Alexithymia Scale, the Beck Depression Inventory, and sociodemographic background.
The prevalence of pathological dissociation (DES-T >/= 20) was 3.4% in the general population and did not differ significantly between genders. Men scored higher than women in the amnesia subscale, and women in the absorption and imaginative involvement subscale. The relationship between pathological dissociation, alexithymia, depression and suicidality was strong. The likelihood of pathological dissociation was nearly nine-fold higher among depressive subjects, more than seven-fold higher among alexithymic subjects, and more than four-fold higher among suicidal subjects than among the others. Frequent alcohol consumption also associated significantly with pathological dissociation.
A significant relationship between pathological dissociation, depression, alexithymia, and suicidality was found in the general population. The importance of these factors should be examined in a prospective study design to determine causality.

Download full-text


Available from: Päivi Maaranen, Aug 28, 2015
  • Source
    • "Despite DD patients' evident safety struggles, few studies on self-harm focus specifically on DD patients, and most studies are either non-empirical or utilize mixed psychiatric populations (e.g., Boon & Draijer, 1993; Cerutti, Presaghi, Manca, & Gratz, 2012; Foote et al., 2008; Kluft, 1995; Loewenstein & Putnam, 1990; Maaranen et al., 2005; van der Kolk et al., 1991; Saxe et al., 2002; Yargiç et al., 1998). One exception is Engelberg and Brand (2012), who examined patient-reported self-harm over the 30-month TOP DD study and found depression severity positively correlated with patient-reported NSSI and negatively correlated with patientreported suicide attempts. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The present study investigates whether symptom severity can distinguish patients diagnosed with dissociative identity disorder (DID) and dissociative disorder not otherwise specified (DDNOS) with a recent history of non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI) and suicide attempts from those without recent self-harm. Two hundred forty one clinicians reported on recent history of patient NSSI and suicide attempts. Two hundred twenty-one of these clinicians' patients completed dissociative, depressive, and posttraumatic stress disorder symptomatology measures. Baseline cross-sectional data from a naturalistic and prospective study of dissociative disorder (DD) patients receiving community treatment was utilized. Analyses evaluated dissociative, depressive, and PTSD symptom severity as methods of classifying patients into NSSI and suicide attempt groupings. Results indicated that dissociation severity accurately classified patients into NSSI and suicidality groups, while depression severity accurately classified patients into NSSI groups. These findings point to dissociation and depression severity as important correlates of NSSI and suicidality in patients with DDs, and have implications for self-harm prevention and treatment.
    Journal of Trauma & Dissociation 07/2015; DOI:10.1080/15299732.2015.1067941 · 1.72 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "This can include the absence of expectable experiences (e.g., memories of one's own behaviors), the distortion of expectable experiences (e.g., feeling as though one is floating above one's own body), and/or intrusion into expectable experiences (e.g., flashbacks; Braun, 1988; Dell, 2009). Studies within the general population have found that a majority of individuals espouse having had at least some degree of minor dissociative experience (Ross, Joshi, & Currie, 1991), whereas other research found an approximately 1%–5% prevalence for clinical dissociation at levels that would fulfill criteria for a dissociative disorder (Johnson, Cohen, Kasen, & Brook, 2006; Maarenan et al., 2004; Vanderlinden, Van der Hart, & Varga, 1996). Meanwhile, prevalence rates within psychiatric settings appear to range much higher, estimated at 4%–29% for dissociative disorders overall (Foote et al., 2006; Saxe et al., 1993). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Extant research indicates that dissociation may act as a risk factor for non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI), but the data are mixed. In this study, 75 university and community females, aged 18-35, were assessed for rates of normative, clinical, and severely clinical dissociation, as well as for NSSI. Significant differences in normative dissociation were found between the control group and the group reporting a history of NSSI. Additionally, normative dissociation - but not clinical or severely clinical dissociation - was found to be significantly associated with NSSI in this sample. Considering this finding in the context of existing literature, the authors propose a quartile risk model of dissociation and NSSI as a new approach to the influences of levels of dissociation on NSSI risk.
    Journal of Trauma & Dissociation 03/2015; 16(3). DOI:10.1080/15299732.2015.989645 · 1.72 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "Provided that PNESs is pathological dissociation, its prevalence in patients with epilepsy is significantly increased compared to a rate of 0.3–3.4% of pathological dissociative symptoms in the general population [6] [7] [8] "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Psychogenic nonepileptic seizures (PNESs) in patients with epilepsy can be categorized as dissociative disorders. The prevalence of PNESs in patients with epilepsy appears to be much higher than that of dissociative experiences in nonclinical subjects. In order to clarify as to whether epilepsy-related factors were associated with pathological dissociation, we conducted a controlled study with 225 patients with epilepsy and 334 nonclinically matched individuals. All participants completed the Japanese version of the Dissociative Experiences Scale (DES). There was no significant difference in the DES score (DES-S) between the group with epilepsy and the control group. The group with epilepsy showed a significantly higher DES taxon (DES-T; a subset of DES-S and an index of pathological dissociation) than the control group. Thirty-one out of the 225 patients with epilepsy (13.8%) had PNESs. Because of its strong association with the DES-S and DES-T, PNESs can be regarded as a symptom of dissociation. With multiple regression analysis, the patients with a shorter duration of epilepsy, higher seizure frequency, or shorter period in education tend to suffer from pathological dissociation. These findings demonstrate that patients with epilepsy are more prone to experiencing pathological dissociation when having certain clinical factors. Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
    Epilepsy & Behavior 02/2015; 44:185–191. DOI:10.1016/j.yebeh.2014.12.018 · 2.06 Impact Factor
Show more