Article

Uncertainty of knee joint muscle activity during knee joint torque exertion: the significance of controlling adjacent joint torque.

Dept. of Rehabilitation for Movement Functions, Research Institute NRCD, 4-1 Namiki, Tokorozawa, Saitama 359-8555, Japan.
Journal of Applied Physiology (Impact Factor: 3.48). 10/2005; 99(3):1093-103. DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00365.2005
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT In the single-joint torque exertion task, which has been widely used to control muscle activity, only the relevant joint torque is specified. However, the neglect of the neighboring joint could make the procedure unreliable, considering our previous result that even monoarticular muscle activity level is indefinite without specifying the adjacent joint torque. Here we examined the amount of hip joint torque generated with knee joint torque and its influence on the activity of the knee joint muscles. Twelve healthy subjects were requested to exert various levels of isometric knee joint torque. The knee and hip joint torques were obtained by using a custom-made device. Because no information about hip joint torque was provided to the subjects, the hip joint torque measured here was a secondary one associated with the task. The amount of hip joint torque varied among subjects, indicating that they adopted various strategies to achieve the task. In some subjects, there was a considerable internal variability in the hip joint torque. Such variability was not negligible, because the knee joint muscle activity level with respect to the knee joint torque, as quantified by surface electromyography (EMG), changed significantly when the subjects were requested to change the strategy. This change occurred in a very systematic manner: in the case of the knee extension, as the hip flexion torque was larger, the activity of mono- and biarticular knee extensors decreased and increased, respectively. These results indicate that the conventional single knee joint torque exertion has the drawback that the intersubject and/or intertrial variability is inevitable in the relative contribution among mono- and biarticular muscles because of the uncertainty of the hip joint torque. We discuss that the viewpoint that both joint torques need to be considered will bring insights into various controversial problems such as the shape of the EMG-force relationship, neural factors that help determine the effect of muscle strength training, and so on.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
59 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Recent research suggests that the nervous system controls muscles by activating flexible combinations of muscle synergies to produce a wide repertoire of movements. Muscle synergies are like building blocks, defining characteristic patterns of activation across multiple muscles that may be unique to each individual, but perform similar functions. The identification of muscle synergies has strong implications for the organization and structure of the nervous system, providing a mechanism by which task-level motor intentions are translated into detailed, low-level muscle activation patterns. Understanding the complex interplay between neural circuits and biomechanics that give rise to muscle synergies will be crucial to advancing our understanding of neural control mechanisms for movement.
    Current Opinion in Neurobiology 01/2008; 17(6):622-8. · 7.34 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In our musculoskeletal system, multiple muscles are involved in the generation of torque about a joint. Hence, an infinite number of combinations of muscle activities may exist in producing a certain amount of joint torque. Many studies have assumed that the level of muscle activity level depends on torque about the joint it spans. However, this assumption does not hold true in the presence of biarticular muscles. Here we show that the muscle activity level is modulated according to a scheme called "cosine tuning" based on our experiment on the isometric force exerted by the lower limb, that is, the muscle activity about the knee and the hip joints can be represented by a linear summation of the knee and hip joint torques. This way of modulation is very simple, but it is unintuitive on the point that the activation level of the monoarticular muscles explicitly depends on the torque of the adjacent joint that they do not span. It is demonstrated that such nontrivial cosine tuning can be mathematically explained by assuming that the muscle activity pattern is determined so as to minimize the variability of the end point force. Finally, the implications of the cosine tuning for muscle strength training and motor control are discussed.
    Medicine and science in sports and exercise 01/2009; 41(1):205-9. · 4.48 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: High-resistance strength training (HRST) is one of the most widely practiced forms of physical activity, which is used to enhance athletic performance, augment musculo-skeletal health and alter body aesthetics. Chronic exposure to this type of activity produces marked increases in muscular strength, which are attributed to a range of neurological and morphological adaptations. This review assesses the evidence for these adaptations, their interplay and contribution to enhanced strength and the methodologies employed. The primary morphological adaptations involve an increase in the cross-sectional area of the whole muscle and individual muscle fibres, which is due to an increase in myofibrillar size and number. Satellite cells are activated in the very early stages of training; their proliferation and later fusion with existing fibres appears to be intimately involved in the hypertrophy response. Other possible morphological adaptations include hyperplasia, changes in fibre type, muscle architecture, myofilament density and the structure of connective tissue and tendons. Indirect evidence for neurological adaptations, which encompasses learning and coordination, comes from the specificity of the training adaptation, transfer of unilateral training to the contralateral limb and imagined contractions. The apparent rise in whole-muscle specific tension has been primarily used as evidence for neurological adaptations; however, morphological factors (e.g. preferential hypertrophy of type 2 fibres, increased angle of fibre pennation, increase in radiological density) are also likely to contribute to this phenomenon. Changes in inter-muscular coordination appear critical. Adaptations in agonist muscle activation, as assessed by electromyography, tetanic stimulation and the twitch interpolation technique, suggest small, but significant increases. Enhanced firing frequency and spinal reflexes most likely explain this improvement, although there is contrary evidence suggesting no change in cortical or corticospinal excitability. The gains in strength with HRST are undoubtedly due to a wide combination of neurological and morphological factors. Whilst the neurological factors may make their greatest contribution during the early stages of a training programme, hypertrophic processes also commence at the onset of training.
    Sports Medicine 37(2). · 5.32 Impact Factor

Full-text (2 Sources)

View
24 Downloads
Available from
May 19, 2014