Probing phosphoinositide functions in signaling and membrane trafficking.

Division of Cell Signalling, School of Life Sciences, MSI/WTB Complex, University of Dundee, Dundee DD1 5EH, Scotland, UK.
Trends in Cell Biology (Impact Factor: 12.31). 06/2005; 15(5):259-68. DOI: 10.1016/j.tcb.2005.03.008
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The inositol phospholipids (PIs) comprise a family of eight species with different combinations of phosphate groups arranged around the inositol ring. PIs are among the most versatile signaling molecules known, with key roles in receptor-mediated signal transduction, actin remodeling and membrane trafficking. Recent studies have identified effector proteins and specific lipid-binding domains through which PIs signal. These lipid-binding domains can be used as probes to further our understanding of the spatial and temporal control of individual PI species. New layers of complexity revealed by the use of such probes include the occurrence of PIs at intracellular locations, the identification of phosphatidylinositol signaling hotspots and the presence of non-membrane pools of PIs in cell nuclei.

  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Ptdlns(4,5) is a key cellular phosphoinositide that localizes in separate and distinctive pools in subcellular membrane and vesicular compartments. In membranes, Ptdlns(4,5) acts as a precursor to second messengers and is itself a main signaling and targeting molecule. Specific subcellular localization of type I PIP kinases directed by interacting with specific targeting module differentiates Ptdlns(4,5) production in a spatial and temporal manner. Several lines of evidences support the idea that Ptdlns(4,5) is generated in very specific pools in a spatial and temporal manner or by feeding Ptdlns(4,5) directly to effectors. In this concept, the interaction of PIPKI isoforms with a specific targeting module to allow precise subcellular targeting modulates highly specific Ptdlns(4,5) synthesis and channeling overall effectors. For instance, localization of PIPKI661 to focal adhesions by an interaction with talin results in spatial and temporal production of Ptdlns(4,5), which regulates EGF-stimulated directional cell migration. In addition, Type PIPK is targeted to E-cadherin in cell adherence junction and plays a role in controlling dynamics of cell adherence junction and endocytosis of E-cadherin. Characterizing how PIP kinase isoforms are regulated by interactions with their targeting modules, as well as the mechanisms by which their product, Ptdlns(4,5), exerts its effects on cellular signaling processes, is crucial to understand the harmonized control of numerous cellular signaling pathways. Thus, in this review the roles of the Ptdlns(4)P(5) kinases and Ptdlns(4,5) were described and critically reviewed in terms of regulation of the E-cadherin trafficking, cell migration, and formation of cell adherence junction which is indispensable and is tightly controlled in epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition process.
    03/2008; 24(1). DOI:10.5487/TR.2008.24.1.001
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: PI3K and PTEN have been shown to participate in synaptic plasticity, during long-term potentiation (LTP) and long-term depression (LTD), respectively. Nevertheless, the dynamics of phosphatidylinositol-(3,4,5)-trisphosphate (PIP3) and the regulation of its synthesis and degradation at synaptic compartments is far from clear. Here, we have used FRET imaging to monitor changes in PIP3 levels in dendritic spines from CA1 hippocampal neurons under basal conditions and upon induction of NMDA receptor-dependent LTD and LTP. We found that PIP3 is under constant turnover in dendritic spines. Contrary to the expectation, both LTD and LTP induction trigger an increase in PIP3 synthesis, which requires NMDA receptors and PI3K activity. Using biochemical methods, the upregulation of PIP3 levels during LTP was estimated to be two-fold. However, in the case of LTD, PTEN activity counteracts the increase in PIP3 synthesis, resulting in no net change in PIP3 levels. Therefore, both LTP and LTD signaling converge towards PIP3 upregulation, but PTEN acts as an LTD-selective switch that determines the outcome of PIP3 accumulation.
    Journal of Cell Science 10/2014; DOI:10.1242/jcs.156554 · 5.33 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Lipid-binding proteinsjoin many important biological processes. Lipid-binding proteins are highly related to diseases, such as metabolic diseases, cancer and autoimmune diseases. The existed studies of predictinglipid-binding functions or predictinglipid-binding sites, but notidentify the lipid-binding proteins ornot lipid-binding proteins.This study purpose a systematic approach to identify a small set of physicochemical and biochemical properties in AAindex database to design support vector machine (SVM) based classifier for predicting and analyzing lipid-binding proteins. The merits of this study are three-fold: First, we establish a data set of lipid-binding proteins collected from SwissProt utilizing the gene ontology (GO) annotation terms. Secondly, utilize an efficient genetic algorithm based optimization method IBCGA to select an informative set of feature vectors of representing sequences from the viewpoint of machine learning. Thirdly, analyze the selected feature vectors to identify the related physicochemical properties which may affect the binding mechanism oflipid-binding proteins. In this study, to overcome the unbalanced dataset problem caused from the number of putative negative dataset (537,346) being almost 530 times to that of positive dataset (1,053), a dataset determining technique is proposed.Then the dataset is applied to make a high performance classifier. The prediction accuracy of independent test is 77.75% using 18 properties. The selected 18 properties may divide into 6 groupings:alpha and turn propensities, beta propensity, Composition, Hydrophobicity, Physicochemical properties and other properties.Hydrophobicity and alpha-helix are most relative to lipid-binding protein.
    09/2013; 421:313-318. DOI:10.4028/

Full-text (2 Sources)

Available from
Jun 10, 2014