Chronic depression: medication (nefazodone) or psychotherapy (CBASP) is effective when the other is not.

Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305-5717, USA.
Archives of General Psychiatry (Impact Factor: 13.75). 06/2005; 62(5):513-20. DOI: 10.1001/archpsyc.62.5.513
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Although various strategies are available to manage nonresponders to an initial treatment for depression, no controlled trials address the utility of switching from an antidepressant medication to psychotherapy or vice versa.
To compare the responses of chronically depressed nonresponders to 12 weeks of treatment with either nefazodone or cognitive behavioral analysis system of psychotherapy (CBASP) who were crossed over to the alternate treatment (nefazodone, n = 79; CBASP, n = 61).
Crossover trial.
Twelve academic outpatient psychiatric centers.
There were 140 outpatients with chronic major depressive disorder; 92 (65.7%) were female, 126 (90.0%) were white, and the mean age was 43.1 years. Thirty participants dropped out of the study prematurely, 22 in the nefazodone group and 8 in the CBASP group.
Treatment lasted 12 weeks. The dosage of nefazodone was 100 to 600 mg/d; CBASP was provided twice weekly during weeks 1 through 4 and weekly thereafter.
The 24-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression, administered by raters blinded to treatment, the Clinician Global Impressions-Severity scale, and the 30-item Inventory for Depressive Symptomatology-Self-Report.
Analysis of the intent-to-treat sample revealed that both the switch from nefazodone to CBASP and the switch from from CBASP to nefazodone resulted in clinically and statistically significant improvements in symptoms. Neither the rates of response nor the rates of remission were significantly different when the groups of completers were compared. However, the switch to CBASP following nefazodone therapy was associated with significantly less attrition due to adverse events, which may explain the higher intent-to-treat response rate among those crossed over to CBASP (57% vs 42%).
Among chronically depressed individuals, CBASP appears to be efficacious for nonresponders to nefazodone, and nefazodone appears to be effective for CBASP nonresponders. A switch from an antidepressant medication to psychotherapy or vice versa appears to be useful for nonresponders to the initial treatment.


Available from: John C Markowitz, Apr 26, 2015
1 Follower
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background: It is widely agreed that chronic depression is difficult to treat, knowledge about optimal treatment approaches is emerging. Method: A multisite randomized controlled trial was conducted comparing the cognitive behavioral analysis system of psychotherapy (CBASP), a psychotherapy model developed specifically to treat chronic depression (n = 67) with care as usual (CAU; evidence-based treatments, n = 72) over a period of 52 weeks, with 23 sessions on average, in 3 outpatient clinics in the Netherlands. In both arms algorithm-based pharmacotherapy was provided. Patients (aged 18-65) met criteria for a DSM-IV diagnosis of major depressive disorder with diagnostic specifiers (chronic, without interepisode recovery) or with co-occurring dysthymic disorder indicating a chronic course. The Inventory for Depressive Symptomatology (IDS) Self-Report was used as the primary outcome measure. Mixed-effects linear regression analysis was used to compare the changes on the IDS scores between CBASP and CAU. The IDS was administered before treatment, and after 8, 16, 32 and 52 weeks. Results: At week 52, patients assigned to CBASP had a greater reduction of depressive symptoms compared to patients assigned to CAU (t = -2.00, p = 0.05). However, CBASP and CAU did not differ from each other on the IDS after 8 weeks (t = 0.49, p = 0.63), 16 weeks (t = -0.03, p = 0.98) and 32 weeks (t = -0.17, p = 0.86) of treatment. Conclusions: This trial shows that CBASP is at least as effective as standard evidence-based treatments for chronic depression. In the long run, CBASP appears to have an added effect. © 2014 S. Karger AG, Basel.
    Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics 08/2014; 83(5):263-269. DOI:10.1159/000360795 · 9.37 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Die chronische Depression ist eine schwer beeinträchtigende psychische Störung, welche meist schon während der Kindheit beginnt. Viele der betroffenen Patienten berichten über frühe traumatisierende Beziehungserfahrungen mit wichtigen Bezugspersonen. Aufgrund der hohen Therapieresistenz stellt sie eine therapeutische Herausforderung dar. Das Cognitive Behavioral Analysis System of Psychotherapy (CBASP) ist die erste Psychotherapie, welche speziell für diese Patientengruppe entwickelt wurde. CBASP kombiniert schulenübergreifend behaviorale, kognitiv-emotionale, interpersonelle und psychodynamisch-analytische Theorien, indem Kindheits- und Lebenserfahrungen in einen Zusammenhang zu aktuellen interpersonellen Problemen gestellt werden. Zentrale Therapie-Elemente sind die Liste prägender Bezugspersonen mit Übertragungshypothesen, Situationsanalysen mit Verhaltenstrainings durch Rollenspiele, interpersonelle Strategien und Transferübungen. Die therapeutische Rolle ist gekennzeichnet durch das disziplinierte Preisgeben eigener Gefühle und Reaktionen auf die Verhaltensweisen chronisch Depressiver, um dem Patienten korrigierende und heilsame Beziehungserfahrungen zu ermöglichen. Randomisiert kontrollierte Studien und Einzelfallstudien konnten die Wirksamkeit von CBASP in der Behandlung der chronischen Depression nachweisen. Nach den Kriterien der American Psychiatric Association kann CBASP mittlerweile als empirisch validiert angesehen werden. Weitere Studien, insbesondere zum Vergleich mit anderen Psychotherapien sowie Prozess- und Prädiktorstudien, sind jedoch wichtig und laufen derzeit. Zudem wird CBASP für verschiedene Settings (stationär, in Gruppen) und andere Störungsbilder modifiziert.Im Beitrag erfolgt abschließend eine kritische Diskussion und Würdigung des Ansatzes.
    Zeitschrift für klinische Psychologie und Psychotherapie 01/2014; 43(4):259-269. DOI:10.1026/1616-3443/a000281 · 0.57 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Cognitive behavior therapy (CBT), as exemplified by the model of psychotherapy developed and refined over the past 40 years by A.T. Beck and colleagues, is one of the treatments of first choice for ambulatory depressive and anxiety disorders. Over the past several decades, there have been vigorous efforts to adapt CBT for treatment of more severe mental disorders, including schizophrenia and the more chronic and/or treatment refractory mood disorders. These efforts have primarily studied CBT as an adjunctive therapy, i.e., in combination with pharmacotherapy. Given the several limitations of state-of-the-art pharmacotherapies for these severe mental disorders, demonstration of clinically meaningful additive effects for CBT would have important implications for improving public health. This paper reviews the key developments in this important area of therapeutics, providing a summary of the current state of the art and suggesting directions for future research.
    10/2014; 13(3). DOI:10.1002/wps.20149