Article

Does the type of hormone replacement therapy influence the risk of deep vein thrombosis? A prospective case-control study

Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.
Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis (Impact Factor: 5.55). 06/2005; 3(5):943-8. DOI: 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2005.01268.x
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Although hormone replacement therapy (HRT) is associated with an increased risk of deep vein thrombosis (DVT), it is not clear if the risk differs in users of combined estrogen-progestin HRT and estrogen-only HRT.
We prospectively studied postmenopausal women with suspected DVT in whom HRT use status was ascertained and who subsequently had objective diagnostic testing to confirm or exclude DVT. Cases were patients with idiopathic DVT, in whom there were no DVT risk factors, and controls were patients without DVT, in whom there were also no DVT risk factors. The risk of DVT was determined in users of estrogen-progestin HRT and estrogen-only HRT by comparing the prevalence of current HRT use in cases with idiopathic DVT and controls without DVT (reference group). Multivariable regression analysis was done to adjust for factors that might confound an association between HRT use and the risk of DVT.
One thousand one hundred and sixty-eight postmenopausal women with suspected DVT were assessed, from whom 95 cases of idiopathic DVT and 610 controls without DVT and no DVT risk factors were identified. Estrogen-only HRT was associated with an increased risk for DVT that was not statistically significant [odds ratio (OR) = 1.22; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.57, 2.61]. Estrogen-progestin HRT was associated with a greater than 2-fold increased risk for DVT (OR = 2.70; 95% CI 1.44, 5.07).
The risk of developing DVT may be higher in users of combined estrogen-progestin HRT than in users of estrogen-only HRT.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Jeffrey S Ginsberg, Sep 27, 2014
0 Followers
 · 
77 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Hormone therapy (HT) after the menopause is associated with increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE). Tibolone has pharmacodynamic properties different from other hormone preparations. We compared the effect of a combined HT and tibolone on the inhibition of haemostasis. Thirty-eight post-menopausal women were randomly assigned to 1.25 or 2.5 mg per day of tibolone or oral continuous combined conjugated equine estrogen plus medroxyprogesterone acetate (CEE/MPA). Inhibitors of haemostasis were measured at baseline and after 12 months. Results from the two groups of women receiving tibolone were not significantly different and, to improve the power of the study, the two groups were merged. Higher concentration of protein S (1.16 versus 1.00 IU ml(-1); P = 0.005) and higher activated protein C resistance ratio (APC-R) (4.2 versus 3.65; P = 0.04) were observed in the tibolone group than in the CEE/MPA group. Both doses of tibolone increased APC-R significantly (P < 0.01). Tissue factor pathway inhibitor (TFPI) was lower in the CEE/MPA group than in the tibolone group (67.8 versus 79.9 ng ml(-1); P = 0.03). CEE/MPA reduced the concentration of antithrombin (P = 0.002), protein S (P < 0.001) and TFPI (P < 0.001). Both preparations reduced the concentration of plasminogen activator inhibitor 1 (P < 0.05). Tibolone induces fewer pharmacological alterations on blood coagulability than CEE/MPA and has a potentially favourable effect on APC-R. This may translate into a corresponding low risk of VTE, as also indicated from the existing clinical data.
    Human Reproduction 05/2007; 22(4):1186-91. DOI:10.1093/humrep/del498 · 4.59 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Hormone therapy (HT) is associated with a modest, but significantly increased risk for arterial and venous thromboembolism. We have compared the effects of estrogen, tibolone, and raloxifene on relevant markers of coagulation activation and investigated whether there is a dose-response relationship of oral HT. Randomized, open-label, comparative study of 202 healthy women who were assigned to receive treatment for 12 weeks with either low-dose hormone therapy containing 1 mg 17beta-estradiol + 0.5 mg norethisterone acetate (NETA) (n=50), conventional-dose HT containing 2 mg 17beta-estradiol and 1 mg NETA (n=50), 2.5 mg tibolone (n=51), or 60 mg raloxifene (n=51). The groups were comparable with regard to demographic characteristics and laboratory variables at baseline. D-dimer increased markedly in the conventional-dose HT group, but remained unchanged in the low-dose HT group. Tibolone was associated with a medium increase, whereas raloxifene was associated with a decrease in D-dimer levels. Changes in prothrombin fragment 1 + 2 showed a similar pattern for all four groups, whereas no significant differences in changes of thrombin-antithrombin complex were observed. Our data suggest that low-dose HT is associated with less activation of coagulation than conventional-dose HT. This finding may be of clinical importance since randomized clinical trials showing increased risk of thrombosis have utilized conventional-dose HT.
    Maturitas 11/2006; 55(3):278-87. DOI:10.1016/j.maturitas.2006.04.012 · 2.86 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a major harmful effect of hormone therapy (HT) among postmenopausal women. A large variety of HT can be used with significant differences in adverse effects. There is evidence that the VTE risk among HT users depends on the route of estrogen administration. Oral but not transdermal estrogens dose-dependently increase the VTE risk. This difference is supported by biological data. Whereas oral estrogens increase thrombin generation and induce resistance to activated protein C, transdermal estrogens have minimal effect on hemostasis. Past users of oral estrogens have a similar VTE risk to never users. Among users of oral estrogens, the VTE risk is higher within the 1st year of treatment. The combination of oral estrogen use and either obesity or thrombogenic mutations further enhances the VTE risk, whereas transdermal estrogens may not confer additional risk in women at high VTE risk. Significant differences in the VTE risk between HT preparations are also related to the type of concomitant progestogen. The VTE risk is greater in women using medroxyprogesterone acetate than in those receiving other progestins, whereas micronized progesterone appears safe. Based on the current data, transdermal estrogen alone or combined with progesterone could be the safer HT especially in women at high risk for thrombosis. © 2014 S. Karger AG, Basel.
    Frontiers of hormone research 01/2014; 43:21-32. DOI:10.1159/000360554 · 1.24 Impact Factor