Article
Bipolar radiofrequency ablation of liver metastases during laparotomy. First clinical experiences with a new multipolar ablation concept.
Department of General, Vascular and Thoracic Surgery, Charité, University Medicine Berlin, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Berlin, Germany.
International Journal of Colorectal Disease (impact factor:
2.38).
02/2006;
21(1):25-32.
DOI:10.1007/s00384-005-0781-y
pp.25-32
Source: PubMed
-
Article: A comparison of percutaneous cryosurgery and percutaneous radiofrequency for unresectable hepatic malignancies.
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: The complication and success rates in patients treated with either percutaneous cryosurgery (PCS) or percutaneous radiofrequency (PRF) for unresectable hepatic malignancies are similar. Retrospective study. University hospital. Sixty-four patients were treated with either PCS (n = 31) or PRF (n = 33). Patient treatment was based on the random availability of the probes. Tumors were evaluated by a blinded comparison of pretreatment and posttreatment helical computed tomographic scans. All living patients had at least a 6-month follow-up. Complication rate, initial treatment success (complete devascularization of the tumor), and local recurrence (tumor revascularization within or at its periphery). The distribution of tumor types was similar in the 2 groups (P =.76). One patient with cirrhosis died of variceal hemorrhage on day 30 after PCS (mortality, 3.2%), while no mortality was observed after PRF (P =.48). Complications occurred in 9 (29%) of the patients following PCS and in 8 (24%) of the patients following PRF (P =.66). Initial treatment success was comparable in the 2 treatment groups (30 [83%] of 36 tumors following PCS vs 34 [83%] of 41 tumors following PRF). However, local recurrences occurred more frequently after PCS than after PRF (16 [53%] of 30 vs 6 [18%] of 34; P =.003). The higher rate of local recurrence was identified for metastases (10 [71%] of 14 after PCS vs 3 [19%] of 16 after PRF; P =.004), while the difference was not significant for hepatocellular carcinoma (6 [38%] of 16 after PCS vs 3 [17%] of 18 after PRF; P =.25). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that the use of PCS (P =.003) and more than 1 treatment (P =.05) were independent risk factors for local tumor recurrence. While similar initial treatment success and complication rates are observed following either PCS or PRF, local recurrences occur more frequently following PCS, particularly for metastases.Archives of Surgery 01/2003; 137(12):1332-9; discussion 1340. · 4.24 Impact Factor -
Article: Impact of radiofrequency ablation on the management of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma in a specialized centre.
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) has been used increasingly in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The aim of this study was to investigate changes in the treatment pattern of primary HCC following the implementation of RFA in a specialized surgical centre. This was a retrospective analysis of all 894 patients admitted for treatment of primary HCC over 36 months. There was no difference in the age, sex ratio, liver function according to Child-Pugh grade, serum alpha-fetoprotein concentration, hepatitis B surface antigen status and tumour size among patients before and after the introduction of RFA therapy. Fifty-one patients (10.6 per cent) with primary HCC received RFA treatment after its implementation. There was a 6.8 per cent reduction in the number of patients who had supportive treatment (P = 0.041) and a 3.2 per cent reduction in surgical treatment. The hospital mortality rates for RFA and surgery were 2.0 and 4.9 per cent respectively. The overall survival rates at 6, 12 and 18 months for patients treated with RFA were 92.2, 73.4 and 61.2 per cent respectively. The corresponding survival rates for the 213 patients who had surgery were 88.0, 77.0 and 71.5 per cent. These values were no different from those in patients who had RFA (P = 0.718). Patients treated with RFA or surgery survived longer than those who had other treatments. RFA had a significant impact on the management of primary HCC, increasing the number of patients suitable for liver-directed therapy and leading to survival benefit. RFA may become the treatment of choice for patients with irresectable HCC.British Journal of Surgery 04/2004; 91(3):334-8. · 4.61 Impact Factor -
Article: Laparoscopic radiofrequency ablation of the liver in proximity to major vasculature: effect of the Pringle maneuver.
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: The Pringle maneuver has been shown to increase ablation size during radiofrequency ablation (RFA). Efficacy of laparoscopic Pringle in proximity to major vasculature has not been well described. Laparoscopic RFA was performed in proximity to major hepatic vessels to examine effects of the Pringle on ablation size and vascular damage. Laparoscopic RFA was performed in 10 pigs. Each underwent ablation of a peripheral site, and sites adjacent to the portal and hepatic veins. Ultrasound was used to position the RFA adjacent to vascular structures. US flow characteristics verified occlusion of blood flow. Five pigs underwent laparoscopic RFA with Pringle and five underwent laparoscopic RFA alone. Animals were then sacrificed for gross and microscopic evaluation. Peripheral, hepatic, and portal vein ablations showed no significant differences in volume between non-Pringle and Pringle lesions, though the median ablation volume for the peripheral site in the Pringle group was approximately twice that of the non-Pringle group. Pringle group overall median time to target temperature was significantly shorter (P = 0.047). Histologic examination revealed no evidence of endothelial damage or thermal-induced intravascular thrombosis of the hepatic or portal veins. Laparoscopic RFA with Pringle in proximity to major vascular structures does not significantly increase ablation size, or cause acute vascular damage. Further studies are necessary to determine the utility of the Pringle in proximity to major intrahepatic blood vessels.Journal of Surgical Oncology 06/2003; 83(1):36-41. · 2.10 Impact Factor
Data provided are for informational purposes only. Although carefully collected, accuracy cannot be guaranteed.
The impact factor represents a rough estimation of the journal's impact factor and does not reflect the actual
current impact factor.
Publisher conditions are provided by RoMEO. Differing provisions from the publisher's actual policy or licence
agreement may be applicable.
Keywords
12 days post-intervention
14 RF applications
15 possible electrode combinations
3 months
bipolar application system
consecutively activated electrodes
current runs alternating
developed bipolar application system
irresectable liver metastases undergoing laparotomy
large volumes
maximum probe distance
median 9 days
MRI controls 24-48 h
multipolar ablation concept
novel multipolar ablation concept permits
novel multipolar application concept
possible pairs
radiofrequency ablation use monopolar current
tumour size
uncontrolled electrical current paths