Epistaxis: an update on current management

Department of Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, St Michael's Hospital, Bristol, UK.
Postgraduate Medical Journal (Impact Factor: 1.55). 06/2005; 81(955):309-14. DOI: 10.1136/pgmj.2004.025007
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Epistaxis is one of the commonest ENT emergencies. Although most patients can be treated within an accident and emergency setting, some are complex and may require specialist intervention. There are multiple risk factors for the development of epistaxis and it can affect any age group, but it is the elderly population with their associated morbidity who often require more intensive treatment and subsequent admission. Treatment strategies have been broadly similar for decades. However, with the evolution of endoscopic technology, new ways of actively managing epistaxis are now available. Recent evidence suggests that this, combined with the use of stepwise management plans, should limit patient complications and the need for admission. This review discusses the various treatment options and integrates the traditional methods with modern techniques.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Epistaxis is a common emergency in otolaryngology. The aim of this study is to analyze the etiology, management, and accompanying disorders of epistaxis in geriatric patients by reviewing the literature Data of 117 patients 65 years old and older who presented to the Department of Otorhinolaryngology with active epistaxis between 2004 and 2010 were retrospectively reviewed. Records were evaluated for age, sex, accompanying disorders, drug medication, detailed otorhinolaryngological findings, and management of epistaxis. There were 67 women (57.26%) and 50 men (42.74%) with a mean age of 73.51 years (range: 65-90). Ninety-four (80.34%) patients had accompanying disorders such as hypertension, diabetes mellitus, cerebrovascular disease, sinusitis, chronic obstructive lung disease, nasal polyp, and drug treatment. The bleeding site was anterior in 90 patients (76.92%) and posterior in 16 (13.67%). In 11 patients (9.4%), the bleeding site was not identified. Fifty-seven patients (48.71%) were treated with cauterization, 17 patients (14.52%) with nasal packing, 12 patients (10.25%) with medical treatment, 1 patient (0.85%) with mass excision and nasal packing, and 19 patients (16.23%) with more than 1 treatment method. Six patients (5.12%) were untreated because of the unidentified bleeding point. Bleeding control was performed under local anesthesia in 113 patients (96.58%) and under general anesthesia in 4 patients (3.41%). Twenty-one patients (17.94%) were hospitalized and 3 patients (2.56%) required a blood transfusion. Epistaxis is the most common otorhinolaryngological emergency. It must be evaluated carefully to avoid the potential complications resulting from both epistaxis and its associated disorders, especially in geriatric patients.
    Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences 01/2014; 44(1):133-136. DOI:10.3906/sag-1301-58 · 0.84 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In elective ENT surgery, one frequently sees -patients on oral anticoagulants and platelet inhibitors. While continuation of these therapies increases the risk of bleeding complications, indiscriminate discontinuation can have severe thromboembolic consequences. Furthermore, the number of -anticoagulants and platelet inhibitors in use has increased. The ENT-specialist is regulary confronted with the question of continuation, discontinuation, or bridging of this therapy. Review of the available literature on bleeding complications associated with ENT interventions performed with and without anticoagulants. Overview of the indications for anticoagulants and the different mechansims of action and properties of the different agents. Development of protocols for risk stratification and for perioperative management. Patients on oral anticoagulants and platelet inhibitors have significant morbidity and mortality not only due to the underlying diseases, but also due to the perioperative management of these therapies. Perioperative management should be based on well-established treatment guidelines or, in high-risk patients, on multidisciplinary consultation. Even though the recommendations here are evidence-based and cover a multitude of clinical contingencies, they cannot replace clinical decision making, which must consider the specific characteristics and circumstances of the patient, the planned intervention, and the surgical environment. © Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.
    Laryngo-Rhino-Otologie 01/2015; 94(1):10-7. DOI:10.1055/s-0034-1382000 · 0.99 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The anatomy of the head and neck contains very few structures that could be considered expendable and, consequently, is exceptionally intolerant to infection, inflammation, and injury. Acute pathologic processes in this body region, therefore, tend to result in significant suffering, functional impairment, or life endangerment if the diagnosis is missed or treatment is delayed. Many emergent processes within the cervical region also need to be considered for their possible impact on structures within the head and chest, into which there are many routes for potential communication. Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
    Radiologic Clinics of North America 01/2015; 53(1):215-252. DOI:10.1016/j.rcl.2014.09.007 · 1.83 Impact Factor

Full-text (2 Sources)

Available from
May 30, 2014