Article

Cortisol and cytokines in chronic and treatment-resistant patients with schizophrenia: association with psychopathology and response to antipsychotics.

Institute of Mental Health, Peking University, Beijing, PR China.
Neuropsychopharmacology (Impact Factor: 7.83). 09/2005; 30(8):1532-8. DOI: 10.1038/sj.npp.1300756
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The bilateral communication between the immune and neuroendocrine systems plays an essential role in modulating the adequate response of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis to the stimulatory influence of cytokines and stress-related mediators. Growing evidence suggests that neuro-immune-endocrine crosstalk may be impaired in schizophrenia. We determined the relationship between cortisol, cytokines interleukin-2 (IL-2) and interleukin-6 (IL-6), and symptoms in schizophrenia during treatment with typical and atypical antipsychotic drugs. Subjects included 30 healthy controls (HC) and 78 schizophrenic (SCH) in-patients. SCH were randomly assigned to 12-week treatment with 6 mg/day of risperidone or 20 mg/day of haloperidol using a double-blind design. Clinical efficacy was determined using the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS). Serum cortisol and IL-2 levels were assayed by radioimmunometric assay, and serum IL-6 levels by quantitative enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Following a 2-week washout period, serum levels of cortisol, IL-2, and IL-6 were increased in patients with schizophrenia compared to HC. Elevations in cortisol were associated with increase in both IL-2 and IL-6 in SCH. Moreover, elevations in cortisol were associated with negative symptoms and IL-2 with positive symptoms. In all, 12 weeks of risperidone treatment significantly decreased elevated cortisol and improved negative symptoms, but produced similar effects on IL-2 and IL-6 as well as on positive symptoms compared to haloperidol. The improvement of negative symptoms was related to the change in cortisol. Our results suggest that the imbalance in the HPA axis and cytokine system in patients with SCH is implicated in clinical symptoms, and is improved with atypical antipsychotic treatment.

0 Bookmarks
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Schizophrenia is a subtle disorder of brain development and plasticity; it affects the most basic human processes of perception, emotion, and judgment. In Bangladesh the traditional medical practitioners of rural and remote areas characterized the schizophrenia as an insanity or a mental problem due to possession by ghosts or evil spirits and they have used various plant species’ to treat such symptoms. The aim of the present study was to conduct an ethnomedicinal plant survey and documentation of the formulations of different plant parts used by the traditional medical practitioners of Rangamati district of Bangladesh for the treatment of schizophrenia like psychosis. It was observed that the traditional medical practitioners used a total of 15 plant species to make 14 formulations. The plants were divided into 13 families, used for treatment of schizophrenia and accompanying symptoms like hallucination, depression, oversleeping or insomnia, deterioration of personal hygiene, forgetfulness, and fear due to evil spirits like genies or ghost. A search of the relevant scientific literatures showed that a number of plants used by the medicinal practitioners have been scientifically validated in their uses and traditional medicinal knowledge has been a means towards the discovery of many modern medicines. Moreover, the antipsychotic drug reserpine, isolated from the dried root of Rauvolfia serpentina species, revolutionized the treatment of schizophrenia. So it is very much possible that formulations of the practitioner, when examined scientifically in their entireties, can form discovery of lead compounds which can be used as safe and effective antipsychotic drug to treat schizophrenia.
    Schizophrenia Research and Treatment. 06/2014; 2014:1-10.
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: While researchers have for decades considered the role of social factors, endocrinology, neural function, hippocampal integrity, and cognition in the development of schizophrenia, there has been a relative paucity of studies considering the participation of the stress cascade in the interplay of these elements. As described in this review, stressful exposures and stress sensitivity may plausibly be argued to play a role in the etiology, neurobiology, and course of schizophrenia and related psychotic disorders. Notably, research conducted over the last decade has made it increasingly clear that childhood traumatic experiences represent a prominent risk factor for the development of psychotic disorders, including schizophrenia. Accumulating evidence suggests that this relationship is mediated by the development of a neuropathological stress response, involving HPA axis dysregulation, aberrant functioning of different neurotransmitter systems, hippocampal damage, and memory deficits. However, it remains difficult to identify exact causal pathways linking early trauma to schizophrenia, including to the individual symptoms associated with the disorder. In addition to the strong association among early trauma, stress sensitization, and positive symptoms in schizophrenia, there is also evidence indicating that the negative and cognitive symptoms are related to these factors. However, the emergence of these symptoms may lie on a distinct and non-interacting pathway in relation to the development of the positive symptoms. The natural increases in stress sensitivity and HPA axis activity during adolescence may act on already maladaptive stress circuitry resulting from early trauma and/or a genetic predisposition to produce full blown stress sensitization and cause epigenetic effects, such as the altered methylation of different genes, that lead to schizophrenia or other psychiatric illnesses.
    Frontiers in psychological and behavioral science. 01/2014; 3(1):1-17.
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Biomarkers are biological measures that are indicative of a specific disorder, its severity or response to treatment. They are widely used in many areas of medicine, but biomarker development for brain-based disorders lags behind. Using examples from the field of psychiatry, this article reviews the concepts of biomarkers, challenges to their development and the recent progress along those lines. In addition to discussing historical biomarker candidates such as cortisol or catecholamine levels, we include progress from recent genetic, epigenetic, proteomic, neuroimaging and EEG studies. Successful identification of biomarkers will advance the field of psychiatry towards the goal of biological tests for diagnosis, symptom management and treatment response.
    Journal of Comparative Neurology and Psychology 11/2013; 1(2):7.