Article

Non-cardiac QTc-prolonging drugs and the risk of sudden cardiac death.

Pharmaco-Epidemiology Unit, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Erasmus Medical Center, PO Box 1738, 3000 DR Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
European Heart Journal (Impact Factor: 14.72). 11/2005; 26(19):2007-12. DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehi312
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT To assess the association between the use of non-cardiac QTc-prolonging drugs and the risk of sudden cardiac death.
A population-based case-control study was performed in the Integrated Primary Care Information (IPCI) project, a longitudinal observational database with complete medical records from more than 500,000 persons. All deaths between 1 January 1995 and 1 September 2003 were reviewed. Sudden cardiac death was classified based on the time between onset of cardiovascular symptoms and death. For each case, up to 10 random controls were matched for age, gender, date of sudden death, and general practice. The exposure of interest was the use of non-cardiac QTc-prolonging drugs. Exposure at the index date was categorized into three mutually exclusive groups of current use, past use, and non-use. The study population comprised 775 cases of sudden cardiac death and 6297 matched controls. Current use of any non-cardiac QTc-prolonging drug was associated with a significantly increased risk of sudden cardiac death (adjusted OR: 2.7; 95% CI: 1.6-4.7). The risk of death was highest in women and in recent starters.
The use of non-cardiac QTc-prolonging drugs in a general population is associated with an increased risk of sudden cardiac death.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
137 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Levomilnacipran (LVM, Fetzima(®)) was recently approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of major depressive disorder. It is a unique dual neurotransmitter reuptake inhibitor. In contrast with other selective serotonin norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors, including duloxetine, venlafaxine, and desvenlafaxine, it has greater selectivity for inhibiting norepinephrine reuptake than serotonin reuptake. Our review focuses on the efficacy, safety, and tolerability data for five double-blind, placebo-controlled, short-term studies and two long-term studies. In the short-term studies, LVM was found to be more effective than placebo in reducing depression (Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale) scores as well as improving functional impairment (Sheehan Disability Scale) scores. Long-term studies found LVM to be similarly effective but in the only placebo-controlled long-term study, LVM was not significantly superior to placebo. LVM is fairly well tolerated, with the most common adverse events being nausea, headache, dry mouth, hyperhidrosis, and constipation. Discontinuation rates were mildly increased in those being treated with LVM (9%) versus placebo (3%). Adverse events were not dose-related except for urinary hesitancy and erectile dysfunction. LVM was weight neutral, was not toxic to the liver, and did not cause clinically significant QTc prolongation. Consistent with being a predominant potentiator of norepinephrine, pulse and blood pressure were significantly elevated by LVM but rarely induced tachycardia or hypertension. LVM is a relatively safe alternative antidepressant treatment with minimal drug-drug interactions. It is the only antidepressant that has in its labeling that it is not only effective in improving depression but also effective in improving impaired functioning. Whether this important effect on functioning is unique to LVM must be researched. In addition, whether LVM might be effective in norepinephrine-deficit depression, refractory depression, atypical depression, or seasonal depression is yet to be evaluated. Ultimately, head-to-head studies comparing LVM with other antidepressants will determine the place of LM in antidepressant treatment.
    Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment 01/2015; 11:125. DOI:10.2147/NDT.S54710 · 2.00 Impact Factor
  • Source
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The rate of gastric emptying is a critical determinant of postprandial glycaemia and, accordingly, is fundamental to maintaining blood glucose homeostasis. Disordered gastric emptying occurs frequently in patients with longstanding type 1 diabetes mellitus and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). A complex bidirectional relationship exists between gastric emptying and glycaemia-gastric emptying accounts for ∼35% of the variance in peak postprandial blood glucose concentrations in healthy individuals and in patients with diabetes mellitus, and the rate of emptying is itself modulated by acute changes in glycaemia. Clinical implementation of incretin-based therapies for the management of T2DM, which diminish postprandial glycaemia, in part by slowing gastric emptying, is widespread. Other therapies for patients with T2DM, which specifically target gastric emptying include pramlintide and dietary-based treatment approaches. A weak association exists between upper gastrointestinal symptoms and the rate of gastric emptying. In patients with severe diabetic gastroparesis, pathological changes are highly variable and are characterized by loss of interstitial cells of Cajal and an immune infiltrate. Management options for patients with symptomatic gastroparesis remain limited in their efficacy, which probably reflects the heterogeneous nature of the underlying pathophysiology.
    Nature Reviews Endocrinology 11/2014; 11(2). DOI:10.1038/nrendo.2014.202 · 11.03 Impact Factor

Full-text (2 Sources)

Download
2 Downloads
Available from
Mar 11, 2015