Article

Eukaryotic transcription activation: right on target.

Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Program in Gene Function and Expression, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts 01605, USA.
Molecular Cell (Impact Factor: 14.46). 06/2005; 18(4):399-402. DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2005.04.017
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The unambiguous identification of the direct targets of eukaryotic transcriptional activators has been a major challenge in the field. Recently, the authentic targets of several yeast and mammalian activators have been determined, and the results of these studies have important implications for our understanding of transcriptional activation mechanisms.

0 Followers
 · 
44 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Understanding how sequence-specific protein-DNA interactions direct cellular function is of great interest to the research community. High-throughput methods have been developed to determine DNA-binding specificities; one such technique, the bacterial one-hybrid (B1H) system, confers advantages including ease of use, sensitivity and throughput. In this review, we describe the evolution of the B1H system as a tool capable of screening large DNA libraries to investigate protein-DNA interactions of interest. We discuss how DNA-binding specificities produced by the B1H system have been used to predict regulatory targets. Additionally, we examine how this approach has been applied to characterize two common DNA-binding domain families-homeodomains and Cys2His2 zinc fingers-both in organism-wide studies and with synthetic approaches. In the case of the former, the B1H system has produced large catalogs of protein specificity and nuanced information about previously recovered DNA targets, thereby improving our understanding of these proteins' functions in vivo and increasing our capacity to predict similar interactions in other species. In the latter, synthetic screens of the same DNA-binding domains have further refined our models of specificity, through analyzing comprehensive libraries to uncover all proteins able to bind a complete set of targets, and, for instance, exploring how context-in the form of domain position within the parent protein-may affect specificity. Finally, we recognize the limitations of the B1H system and discuss its potential for use in the production of designer proteins and in studies of protein-protein interactions. © The Author 2014. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.
    Briefings in functional genomics 12/2014; 14(1). DOI:10.1093/bfgp/elu048 · 3.43 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: TFIIB (transcription factor IIB) is a transcription factor that provides a bridge between promoter-bound TFIID and RNA polymerase II, and it is a target of various transcriptional activator proteins that stimulate the pre-initiation complex assembly. The localization and/or attachment matrix of TFIIB in the cytoplast is not well understood. This study focuses on the function of TFIIB and its interrelationship with α-tubulins in a mouse model. During oocyte maturation TFIIB distributes throughout the entire nucleus of the germinal vesicle (GV). After progression to GV breakdown (GVBD), TFIIB and α-tubulin co-localize and accumulate in the vicinity of the condensed chromosomes. During the MII stage, the TFIIB signals are more concentrated at the equatorial plate and the kinetochores. Colcemid treatment of oocytes disrupts the microtubule (MT) system, although the TFIIB signals are still present with the altered MT state. Injection of oocytes with TFIIB antibodies and siRNAs causes abnormal spindle formation and irregular chromosome alignment. These findings suggest that TFIIB dissociates from the condensed chromatids and then tightly binds to microtubules from GVBD to the MII phase. The assembly and disassembly of TFIIB may very well be associated with and driven by microtubules. TFIIB maintains its contact with the α-tubulins and its co-localization forms a unique distribution pattern. Depletion of Tf2b in oocytes results in a significant decrease in TFIIB expression, although polar body extrusion does not appear to be affected. Knockdown of Tf2b dramatically affects subsequent embryo development with more than 85% of the embryos arrested at the 2-cell stage. These arrested embryos still maintain apparently normal morphology for at least 96h without any obvious degeneration. Analysis of the effects of TFIIB in somatic cells by co-transfection of BiFC plasmids pHA-Tf2b and pFlag-Tuba1α further confirms a direct interaction between TFIIB and α-tubulins.
    PLoS ONE 11/2013; 8(11):e80039. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0080039 · 3.53 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Although many transcription activators contact the same set of coactivator complexes, the mechanism and specificity of these interactions have been unclear. For example, do intrinsically disordered transcription activation domains (ADs) use sequence-specific motifs, or do ADs of seemingly different sequence have common properties that encode activation function? We find that the central activation domain (cAD) of the yeast activator Gcn4 functions through a short, conserved sequence-specific motif. Optimizing the residues surrounding this short motif by inserting additional hydrophobic residues creates very powerful ADs that bind the Mediator subunit Gal11/Med15 with high affinity via a "fuzzy" protein interface. In contrast to Gcn4, the activity of these synthetic ADs is not strongly dependent on any one residue of the AD, and this redundancy is similar to that of some natural ADs in which few if any sequence-specific residues have been identified. The additional hydrophobic residues in the synthetic ADs likely allow multiple faces of the AD helix to interact with the Gal11 activator-binding domain, effectively forming a fuzzier interface than that of the wild-type cAD.
    Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 08/2014; 111(34). DOI:10.1073/pnas.1412088111 · 9.81 Impact Factor