Article

Dosimetry of digital panoramic imaging. Part I: Patient exposure.

Oral Imaging Centre, School of Dentistry, Oral Pathology and Maxillofacial Surgery, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer 7, 3000 Leuven, Belgium.
Dentomaxillofacial Radiology (Impact Factor: 1.27). 06/2005; 34(3):145-9. DOI: 10.1259/dmfr/28107460
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT To measure patient radiation dose during panoramic exposure with various panoramic units for digital panoramic imaging.
An anthropomorphic phantom was filled with thermoluminescent dosemeters (TLD 100) and exposed with five different digital panoramic units during ten consecutive exposures. Four machines were equipped with a direct digital CCD (charge coupled device) system, whereas one of the units used storage phosphor plates (indirect digital technique). The exposure settings recommended by the different manufacturers for the particular image and patient size were used: tube potential settings ranged between 64 kV and 74 kV, exposure times between 8.2 s and 19.0 s, at fuse current values between 4 mA and 7 mA. The effective radiation dose was calculated with inclusion of the salivary glands.
Effective radiation doses ranged between 4.7 microSv and 14.9 microSv for one exposure. Salivary glands absorbed the most radiation for all panoramic units. When indirect and direct digital panoramic systems were compared, the effective dose of the indirect digital unit (8.1 microSv) could be found within the range of the effective doses for the direct digital units (4.7-14.9 microSv).
A rather wide range of patient radiation doses can be found for digital panoramic units. There is a tendency for lower effective doses for digital compared with analogue panoramic units, reported in previous studies.

1 Bookmark
 · 
183 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Obiettivi La configurazione anatomica più comune nel secondo molare mandibolare é la presenza di due radici, anche se la presenza di una o tre radici è stata giá documentata. L’obiettivo del lavoro é presentare una rara configurazione anatomica, con quattro radici, diagnosticata durante il trattamento endodontico. Materiali e metodi Il trattamento endodontico su questo particolare molare é stato realizzato con il microscopio operatorio. La configurazione anatomica é stata confermata con il ricorso alle immagini della tomografia computorizzata tipo cone beam. É stata realizzata una ricerca, su banca dati elettronica, per identificare tutti i casi pubblicati in cui il secondo molare mandibolare presentava quattro radici. Risultati Le analisi delle immagini della tomografia computorizzata tipo “cone beam” mostrano chiaramente la presenza di tre radici di misura normale e una “radix entomolaris” piú piccola e conica. Nella revisione della letteratura disponibile, non è stato possibile reperire alcun caso documentato come il presente. Conclusioni La configurazione con quattro radici é rara per i molari mandibolari. Questo aspetto ha una incidenza dello 0,04% nei primi molari inferiori, solo tre casi sono stati documentati in vivo. Non esiste un valore di incidenza disponibile per il secondo molare, essendo stato descritto un único caso in letteratura.
    Giornale italiano di endodonzia 06/2014;
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Pediatric patients are considered to be more radiosensitive than adults; thus, radiation dose evaluations based on radiologic examinations are particularly important in this population. However, no national diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) are available for pediatric patients in the Republic of Korea. Therefore, the aim of this study was to determine the usage of panoramic and cephalometric radiography under the National Health Insurance (NHI) scheme and to investigate the current DRLs for child panoramic and lateral cephalometric radiography using dose area product (DAP). DAP values were obtained for standard child exposure settings used routinely by dentists. Analysis was performed on data obtained from 28 panoramic and 20 cephalometric x-ray units for the DAP investigation. DRLs for child panoramic and cephalometric radiography were found to be 95.9 mGy cm and 121.3 mGy cm, respectively. These DRLs are higher than those recommended in the UK and Germany, which indicates that further effort is required to reduce pediatric doses in the Republic of Korea.
    Health Physics 08/2014; 107(2):111-116. · 1.02 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: INTRODUCCIÓN: la imaginología es importante en la valoración diagnóstica y una herramienta útil para la selección de procedimientos en pacientes de los que se sospecha patología maxilofacial. Entre las diferentes modalidades imaginológicas maxilofaciales se encuentran la radiografía panorámica y la tomografía computarizada Cone beam, desarrollada como alternativa a la tomografía convencional, actualmente descrita como Gold standard para imaginología del área oral y maxilofacial. MÉTODOS:observación por dos evaluadores previamente calibrados de 100 tomografías Cone beam y 100 panorámicas tomográficas de pacientes seleccionados aleatoriamente; aplicación de análisis univariado, medidas de tendencia central, y definición de la sensibilidad, especificidad, valor predictivo positivo y negativo en tablas específicas de 2 x 2 aplicando el estudio prueba de una prueba. RESULTADOS: los resultados obtenidos muestran que la panorámica tomográfica tipo Cone beam como prueba diagnóstica frente a la tomografía computarizada Cone beam para evaluar imágenes compatibles con patología sinusal (pólipo, quiste y engrosamiento mucoso) tiene sensibilidad y especificidad variable dependiendo del tipo de patología sinusal, con nivel de confianza del 95% y con coeficiente de kappa con valor de 1 para las tomografías axiales computarizadas y de 0,94-1,0 para la panorámica tomográfica tipo Cone beam. CONCLUSIONES: la panorámica tomográfica Cone beam es lo suficientemente sensible y específica para ser utilizada como herramienta diagnóstica en patología de seno maxilar.
    Revista Facultad de Odontología Universidad de Antioquia. 06/2013; 24(2):232-242.

Full-text (2 Sources)

Download
143 Downloads
Available from
Jun 3, 2014