Dosimetry of digital panoramic imaging. Part I: Patient exposure.

Oral Imaging Centre, School of Dentistry, Oral Pathology and Maxillofacial Surgery, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer 7, 3000 Leuven, Belgium.
Dentomaxillofacial Radiology (Impact Factor: 1.15). 06/2005; 34(3):145-9. DOI: 10.1259/dmfr/28107460
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT To measure patient radiation dose during panoramic exposure with various panoramic units for digital panoramic imaging.
An anthropomorphic phantom was filled with thermoluminescent dosemeters (TLD 100) and exposed with five different digital panoramic units during ten consecutive exposures. Four machines were equipped with a direct digital CCD (charge coupled device) system, whereas one of the units used storage phosphor plates (indirect digital technique). The exposure settings recommended by the different manufacturers for the particular image and patient size were used: tube potential settings ranged between 64 kV and 74 kV, exposure times between 8.2 s and 19.0 s, at fuse current values between 4 mA and 7 mA. The effective radiation dose was calculated with inclusion of the salivary glands.
Effective radiation doses ranged between 4.7 microSv and 14.9 microSv for one exposure. Salivary glands absorbed the most radiation for all panoramic units. When indirect and direct digital panoramic systems were compared, the effective dose of the indirect digital unit (8.1 microSv) could be found within the range of the effective doses for the direct digital units (4.7-14.9 microSv).
A rather wide range of patient radiation doses can be found for digital panoramic units. There is a tendency for lower effective doses for digital compared with analogue panoramic units, reported in previous studies.

1 Bookmark
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: After over one decade development, cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) has been widely accepted for clinical application in almost every field of dentistry. Meanwhile, the radiation dose of CBCT to patient has also caused broad concern. According to the literature, the effective radiation doses of CBCTs in nowadays market fall into a considerably wide range that is from 19 µSv to 1073 µSv and closely related to the imaging detector, field of view, and voxel sizes used for scanning. To deeply understand the potential risk from CBCT, this report also reviewed the effective doses from literatures on intra-oral radiograph, panoramic radiograph, lateral and posteroanterior cephalometric radiograph, multi-slice CT, and so on. The protection effect of thyroid collar and leaded glasses were also reviewed.
    Imaging science in dentistry. 06/2013; 43(2):63-69.
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This study investigated the absorbed doses in a full anthropomorphic body phantom from two different panoramic radiography devices, performing protocols with and without applying a lead apron. A RANDO® full body phantom was equipped with 110 TLD at 55 different sites and set up in two different PR devices (SCANORA® 3D and Promax® 3D) and exposed. Two different protocols were performed in the two devices. The first protocol was performed without any lead shielding, while the phantom was equipped with a standard adult lead apron for the second protocol. A two-tailed paired samples t test for the SCANORA® 3D revealed that there is no difference between the protocol using lead apron shielding (m = 87.99, s = 102.98) compared to the protocol without shielding (m = 87.34, s = 107.49), t(54) = -.313, p > .05. The same test for the Promax® 3D showed that there is also no difference between the protocol using shielding (m = 106.48, s = 117.38) compared to the protocol without shielding (m = 107.75, s = 114,36), t(54) = .938, p > .05. In conclusion, the results of this study showed no statistically significant differences between a PR with or without the use of lead apron shielding.
    Dentomaxillofacial Radiology 10/2013; · 1.15 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This study aimed to provide comparative measurements of the effective dose from direct and indirect digital panoramic units according to phantoms and exposure parameters. Dose measurements were carried out using a head phantom representing an average man (175 cm tall, 73.5 kg male) and a limbless whole body phantom representing an average woman (155 cm tall, 50 kg female). Lithium fluoride thermoluminescent dosimeter (TLD) chips were used for the dosimeter. Two direct and 2 indirect digital panoramic units were evaluated in this study. Effective doses were derived using 2007 International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) recommendations. The effective doses of the 4 digital panoramic units ranged between 8.9 µSv and 37.8 µSv. By using the head phantom, the effective doses from the direct digital panoramic units (37.8 µSv, 27.6 µSv) were higher than those from the indirect units (8.9 µSv, 15.9 µSv). The same panoramic unit showed the difference in effective doses according to the gender of the phantom, numbers and locations of TLDs, and kVp. To reasonably assess the radiation risk from various dental radiographic units, the effective doses should be obtained with the same numbers and locations of TLDs, and with standard hospital exposure. After that, it is necessary to survey the effective doses from various dental radiographic units according to the gender with the corresponding phantom.
    Imaging science in dentistry. 06/2013; 43(2):77-84.

Full-text (2 Sources)

Available from
Jun 3, 2014