Correction: Clinical response to discontinuation of anti-TNF therapy in patients with ankylosing spondylitis after 3 years of continuous treatment with infliximab

Rheumazentrum Ruhrgebiet, Herne, Germany.
Arthritis research & therapy (Impact Factor: 4.12). 03/2005; 7(3):R439-44. DOI: 10.1186/ar1693
Source: PubMed Central

ABSTRACT We analyzed the clinical response and the time to relapse after discontinuation of continuous long-term infliximab therapy in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS). After 3 years of infliximab therapy, all AS patients (n = 42) discontinued treatment (time point (TP)1) and were visited regularly for 1 year in order to assess the time to relapse (TP2). Relapse was defined as an increase to a value >or= 4 on the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) and a physician's global assessment >or= 4 according to the recommendations of the Assessments in Ankylosing Spondylitis (ASAS) working group. After 52 weeks, 41 of the 42 patients (97.6%) had to be reinfused because of relapse. The mean change in the BASDAI between TP1 and TP2 was 3.6 +/- 1.7 and that in the physician's global assessment was 4.4 +/- 1.8 (both P < 0.001). The mean time to relapse was 17.5 weeks (+/- 7.9 weeks, range 7 to 45). Ten patients (24%) showed a relapse within 12 weeks and 38 patients (90.5%), within 36 weeks. After 52 weeks, only one patient had remained in ongoing remission without further treatment with anti-tumor-necrosis factor. Patients who were in partial remission according to the ASAS criteria and those with normal C-reactive protein levels at the time point of withdrawal had longer times to relapse after discontinuation of the treatment. Retreatment with infliximab was safe and resulted in clinical improvement in all patients to a state similar to that before the treatment was stopped. Discontinuation of long-term therapy with infliximab eventually led to relapse of disease activity in all patients but one.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors were the first biologic drugs prescribed for the treatment of spondyloarthritis (SpA) and rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Although they provide significant improvement of signs and symptoms, TNF inhibitors need to be used frequently for a long period of time. The analysis of the follow-up of the largest national biologics registries has shown that the most important adverse effect of TNF inhibitors is infection, which is significantly higher than the non-biologic treatment group; reactivation of latent tuberculosis is three to four times more frequent in patients using monoclonal antibodies than soluble receptors. The only cancer site more frequent to be associated with TNF inhibitors in RA and SpA is the non-melanoma skin cancer. Paradoxical reactions do occur during anti-TNF treatment mainly in SpA, such as new manifestations or flares of acute uveitis, new onset of psoriasis, such as palmoplantar pustulosis, or new onset or flares of inflammatory bowel disease, which occurs especially during etanercept treatment. Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
    Bailli&egrave re s Best Practice and Research in Clinical Rheumatology 10/2014; 28(5):747-763. DOI:10.1016/j.berh.2014.10.001 · 3.06 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The human immune system involves highly complex and coordinated processes in which small proteins named cytokines play a key role. Cytokines have been implicated in the pathogenesis of a number of inflammatory and autoimmune diseases. Cytokines are therefore attractive therapeutic targets in these conditions. Anticytokine therapy for inflammatory diseases became a clinical reality with the introduction of tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors for the treatment of severe rheumatoid arthritis. Although these therapies have transformed the treatment of patients with severe inflammatory arthritis, there remain significant limiting factors: treatment failure is commonly seen in the clinic; safety concerns remain; there is uncertainty regarding the relevance of immunogenicity; the absence of biomarkers to direct therapy decisions and high drug costs limit availability in some healthcare systems. In this article, we provide an overview of the key efficacy and safety trials for currently approved treatments in rheumatoid arthritis and review the major lessons learned from a decade of use in clinical practice, focusing mainly on anti-TNF and anti-interleukin (IL)-6 agents. We also describe the clinical application of anticytokine therapies for other inflammatory diseases, particularly within the spondyloarthritis spectrum, and highlight differential responses across diseases. Finally, we report on the current state of trials for newer therapeutic targets, focusing mainly on the IL-17 and IL-23 pathways. Copyright © 2015 by The American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.
    Pharmacological reviews 04/2015; 67(2):280-309. DOI:10.1124/pr.114.009639 · 18.55 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In spondyloarthritis (SpA), spontaneous remission is best described in reactive arthritis, a form of peripheral SpA. Prior SpA observational studies suggested that a significant percentage of patients reached spontaneous remission; however, these patients were followed up under older, broader European Spondyloarthropathy Study Group (ESSG) criteria or were not defined by specific criteria. In general, they were mixed populations of peripheral and axial disease, and the subsets were not differentiated when assessing end points such as remission. There are limited data on the natural history of axial SpA, in part because of the evolution of the criteria with the more recently developed Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society (ASAS) criteria, including the designation of non-radiographic axial SpA and peripheral SpA. Clinical trials have been conducted with various remission end points including withdrawal of therapy to determine remission maintenance. The following review addresses the potential for remission in axial and peripheral SpA based on the data from both observational studies and clinical trials. Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
    Bailli&egrave re s Best Practice and Research in Clinical Rheumatology 10/2014; 28(5):807-818. DOI:10.1016/j.berh.2014.10.005 · 3.06 Impact Factor

Full-text (5 Sources)

Available from
May 19, 2014