Clinical response to discontinuation of anti-TNF therapy in patients with ankylosing spondylitis after 3 years of continuous treatment with infliximab.

Rheumazentrum Ruhrgebiet, Herne, Germany.
Arthritis research & therapy (Impact Factor: 4.27). 01/2005; 7(3):R439-44. DOI: 10.1186/ar1693
Source: PubMed Central

ABSTRACT We analyzed the clinical response and the time to relapse after discontinuation of continuous long-term infliximab therapy in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS). After 3 years of infliximab therapy, all AS patients (n = 42) discontinued treatment (time point (TP)1) and were visited regularly for 1 year in order to assess the time to relapse (TP2). Relapse was defined as an increase to a value >or= 4 on the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) and a physician's global assessment >or= 4 according to the recommendations of the Assessments in Ankylosing Spondylitis (ASAS) working group. After 52 weeks, 41 of the 42 patients (97.6%) had to be reinfused because of relapse. The mean change in the BASDAI between TP1 and TP2 was 3.6 +/- 1.7 and that in the physician's global assessment was 4.4 +/- 1.8 (both P < 0.001). The mean time to relapse was 17.5 weeks (+/- 7.9 weeks, range 7 to 45). Ten patients (24%) showed a relapse within 12 weeks and 38 patients (90.5%), within 36 weeks. After 52 weeks, only one patient had remained in ongoing remission without further treatment with anti-tumor-necrosis factor. Patients who were in partial remission according to the ASAS criteria and those with normal C-reactive protein levels at the time point of withdrawal had longer times to relapse after discontinuation of the treatment. Retreatment with infliximab was safe and resulted in clinical improvement in all patients to a state similar to that before the treatment was stopped. Discontinuation of long-term therapy with infliximab eventually led to relapse of disease activity in all patients but one.

  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: [This corrects the article on p. 38 in vol. 29, PMID: 24431903.].
    Journal of Korean medical science 03/2014; 29(3):460. · 0.84 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The objectives of this study are to explore the causes of permanent discontinuation of biological therapies in inflammatory rheumatic diseases and to analyse the subsequent course of the disease activity. In this multi-centre retrospective cohort study, data on 126 rheumatoid arthritis, 38 ankylosing spondylitis and 11 psoriatic arthritis patients were analysed, in whom biological therapies had been permanently discontinued. The reasons for the cessation of biologics, the DAS28 or BASDAI disease activity indices at the time of discontinuation and thereafter, and the subsequent occurrence of relapses and the duration of remission or low disease activity were investigated. The most common causes of discontinuation were adverse events (45 %), inefficacy (16 %) or remission (10 %). In rheumatoid arthritis, 33.3 % remained in low disease activity after a mean follow-up of 22 months. If the biologic was stopped when the disease was inactive, 60.6 % remained inactive, and in all the patients in whom the biologic was discontinued because of long-standing remission, the disease remained inactive. Predictors of remission after discontinuation were low disease activity at stopping the biologic and shorter duration of biological therapy. In contrast, 50 % of the ankylosing spondylitis patients relapsed after the withdrawal of anti-TNF therapy. Biologic-free low disease activity can be achieved in at least one third of rheumatoid arthritis patients, and low disease activity at the time of discontinuation is a strong predictor of a subsequent favourable disease course. The likelihood of continued remission after the cessation of a biological therapy is much lower in ankylosing spondylitis.
    Clinical Rheumatology 02/2014; · 2.04 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The window of opportunity is a concept critical to rheumatoid arthritis treatment. Early treatment changes the outcome of rheumatoid arthritis treatment, in that response rates are higher with earlier disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug treatment and damage is substantially reduced. Axial spondyloarthritis is an inflammatory axial disease encompassing both nonradiographic axial spondyloarthritis and established ankylosing spondylitis. In axial spondyloarthritis, studies of magnetic resonance imaging as well as tumor necrosis factor inhibitor treatment and withdrawal studies all suggest that early effective suppression of inflammation has the potential to reduce radiographic damage. This potential would suggest that the concept of a window of opportunity is relevant not only to rheumatoid arthritis but also to axial spondyloarthritis. The challenge now remains to identify high-risk patients early and to commence treatment without delay. Developments in risk stratification include new classification criteria, identification of clinical risk factors, biomarkers, genetic associations, potential antibody associations and an ankylosing spondylitis-specific microbiome signature. Further research needs to focus on the evidence for early intervention and the early identification of high-risk individuals. Axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) is an inflammatory dis-ease of the axial skeleton and pelvis. Regardless of whether it progresses onto ankylosing spondylitis (AS), axSpA has an appreciable disease burden. axSpA is also associated with co-morbidities such as uveitis, psoriasis, inflammatory bowel disease, cardiovascular disease, osteoporosis and significant loss of work productivity. There is emerging evidence that early treatment may change the outcome in axSpA. The window of opportunity is a concept of critical im-portance in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Early treatment results in reductions of disease activity, joint erosions, and better treatment responses the earlier disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs are commenced. It also results in a greater proportion of patients in drug-free remission after treatment withdrawal. These findings have led to changes in RA treatment paradigms, with in-creasing emphasis on early diagnosis and treatment. So how is this concept relevant to axSpA? A number of studies have demonstrated early treatment that
    Arthritis Research & Therapy 05/2014; 16:109. · 4.30 Impact Factor

Full-text (5 Sources)

Available from
May 19, 2014