Clinical response to discontinuation of anti-TNF therapy in patients with ankylosing spondylitis after 3 years of continuous treatment with infliximab.

Rheumazentrum Ruhrgebiet, Herne, Germany.
Arthritis research & therapy (Impact Factor: 4.27). 01/2005; 7(3):R439-44. DOI: 10.1186/ar1693
Source: PubMed Central

ABSTRACT We analyzed the clinical response and the time to relapse after discontinuation of continuous long-term infliximab therapy in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS). After 3 years of infliximab therapy, all AS patients (n = 42) discontinued treatment (time point (TP)1) and were visited regularly for 1 year in order to assess the time to relapse (TP2). Relapse was defined as an increase to a value >or= 4 on the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) and a physician's global assessment >or= 4 according to the recommendations of the Assessments in Ankylosing Spondylitis (ASAS) working group. After 52 weeks, 41 of the 42 patients (97.6%) had to be reinfused because of relapse. The mean change in the BASDAI between TP1 and TP2 was 3.6 +/- 1.7 and that in the physician's global assessment was 4.4 +/- 1.8 (both P < 0.001). The mean time to relapse was 17.5 weeks (+/- 7.9 weeks, range 7 to 45). Ten patients (24%) showed a relapse within 12 weeks and 38 patients (90.5%), within 36 weeks. After 52 weeks, only one patient had remained in ongoing remission without further treatment with anti-tumor-necrosis factor. Patients who were in partial remission according to the ASAS criteria and those with normal C-reactive protein levels at the time point of withdrawal had longer times to relapse after discontinuation of the treatment. Retreatment with infliximab was safe and resulted in clinical improvement in all patients to a state similar to that before the treatment was stopped. Discontinuation of long-term therapy with infliximab eventually led to relapse of disease activity in all patients but one.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This study aims to explore the effectiveness of low dose of etanercept (ETN) in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS) who achieve a good control of their disease in daily clinical practice. This is a case series of AS patients treated with ETN. According to the judgment of the treating rheumatologist and patient's preferences, a dose reduction was done in those patients who achieved a good control of their disease defined by Bath ankylosing spondylitis disease activity index (BASDAI) <4 and C-reactive protein normal values. Fifty-one AS patients treated with ETN were identified and 16 of them (32%) were on dose reduction regimen. Several regimens of dose reduction were used. These patterns were fixed and they did not change along the time. Mean time receiving ETN before adjusting the dose was 17 ± 12 months. Mean follow-up after dose change was 21 ± 21 months. At this point, all the patients in whom dose reduction was done remained in the low-dose regimen. Median BASDAI (range) at starting the low-dose regimen and 6 months later were 1.6 (0.9-2.4) and 1.4 (0.3-3.2), respectively. Median CRP values (range) at starting the low dose regimen and 6 months later were 1 mg/l (0.1-2.8), and 1.3 mg/l (0.3-4.1), respectively. Other disease-related variables also remained unchanged. Patients with follow up at 12 and 24 months and longer remained in clinical remission with BASDAI values <2 and normal CRP values. Our data suggest that AS patients in clinical remission can use low doses of ETN without increasing disease activity. So, it can be a promising strategy but additional studies are needed to prove it.
    Clinical Rheumatology 03/2011; 30(7):993-6. · 2.04 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Therapeutic options for patients with active and severe spondylarthritis (SpA) have been fairly limited in the past decades. There is now accumulating evidence that biological therapy with agents directed against tumour necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) is highly efficacious in the spondyloarthritides, especially in ankylosing spondylitis (AS) and psoriatic arthritis (PsA). The TNF blocking agents currently available, infliximab (Remicade), etanercept (Enbrel), and adalimumab (Humira), are approved for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in Europe and the USA. In contrast to rheumatoid arthritis (RA) disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) have limited efficacy in SpA. No DMARDs are available for AS patients with active spinal disease. Thus, for AS patients whose condition is not sufficiently controlled with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), therapy with TNF blockers may be considered as a first-line treatment. For infliximab, a dose of 3-5 mg/kg seems to be required, and intervals between 6 and 12 weeks are necessary to suppress disease activity continually. The standard dosage of etanercept is 2 x 25 mg subcutaneously (s.c.) per week. There are very few studies with adalimumab (standard dose in RA 20-40 mg s.c. every 1-2 weeks) in SpA. Infliximab and etanercept are now both approved for AS in Europe. There is some evidence that both agents also work in other SpA, especially in PsA. Withdrawal of long-term therapy in AS patients led to relapses of disease after several months. Less radiographic progression after 2 years of continuous treatment with infliximab compared to conventional therapy has been suggested in a small study. Serious adverse events on anti-TNF therapy have remained rare. However, severe infections, including tuberculosis, have been reported. These can be largely prevented by appropriate screening. The benefits of anti-TNF therapy in AS seem to outweigh these shortcomings.
    Scandinavian Journal of Rheumatology 01/2005; 34(3):178-90. · 2.22 Impact Factor
  • Therapy 03/2006; 3(2):191-200.

Full-text (5 Sources)

Available from
May 19, 2014