Article

The usefulness of urinary cytology testing in the evaluation of irritative voiding symptoms.

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Urogynecology and Pelvic Reconstructive Surgery, Women and Infants Hospital, Brown Medical School, Providence, RI, USA.
American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology (Impact Factor: 3.97). 06/2005; 192(5):1554-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2004.10.627
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The purpose of this study was to assess the clinical usefulness of urinary cytology testing for the evaluation of urothelial cancer in women with irritative voiding symptoms who were examined at a urogynecology service.
Urinary cytology studies results that were obtained from January 1, 2000, to December 31, 2002, were cross-matched with the Rhode Island Department of Health Cancer Registry to identify those women who were diagnosed with urinary tract malignancies. The prevalence of urothelial cancer was determined, and the sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of urinary cytologic testing were calculated for 2 common classification strategies: (1) consideration of atypical cytologic test results to be normal and (2) consideration of atypical cytologic test results to be abnormal.
Among 1516 cross-matched cytologic test results from 1324 patients, 5 urothelial cancers were identified. Two of the 5 malignancies were associated with positive cytology results. The prevalence of urothelial cancer was 0.38% (95% CI, 0.1%, 0.9%). When atypical cytology studies were classified as normal, the sensitivity of urinary cytology was 40% (95% CI, 7.2%, 83.0%); the specificity was 99.9% (95% CI, 99.5%, 100%); the positive predictive value was 66.7% (95% CI, 12.5%, 98.2%), and negative predictive value was 99.8% (95% CI, 99.2%, 100%). In contrast, when atypical cytology results were classified as abnormal, the sensitivity and negative predictive value remained the same, but the specificity declined to 93.6% (95% CI, 92.1%, 94.8%), and the positive predictive value decreased to 2.3% (95% CI, 0.4%, 8.8%).
The low prevalence of urothelial cancers and low sensitivity of urinary cytology studies severely limit the usefulness of this test in the evaluation of women with irritative voiding symptoms.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
56 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To examine the 2001 American Urological Association (AUA) recommendations for the evaluation of asymptomatic microscopic hematuria (AMH) in light of the most recent studies available. AMH is a nonspecific marker of disease, but can also be found in healthy individuals. The research done seeks to better identify those patients who present with AMH and have a clinically significant disease. These investigations include epidemiological studies that describe populations at risk, define clinically significant hematuria, and provide long-term follow-up to patients with AMH. Authors have examined the validity and effectiveness of recommended and nonrecommended tests for AMH in different populations. Finally, several studies looked into what workup, if any, patients with AMH were receiving in the community. The evaluation of female patients with AMH needs to be tailored to the individual patient's presentation and risk factors. This evaluation should be timely and always include testing of both upper and lower urinary tract. After a complete negative assessment, no further follow-up is needed.
    Current opinion in obstetrics & gynecology 10/2012; 24(5):324-30. · 2.49 Impact Factor