The Choice of Region of Interest Measures in Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Image Characterization of Experimental Breast Tumors
Center for Pharmaceutical and Molecular Imaging, Department of Radiology, University of California San Francisco, CA 94143, USA. Investigative Radiology
(Impact Factor: 4.44).
06/2005; 40(6):349-54. DOI: 10.1097/01.rli.0000163740.40474.48
The objectives of this study were to determine if magnetic resonance (MR) estimates of quantitative tissue microvascular characteristics from regions of interest (ROI) limited to the tumor periphery provided a better correlation with tumor histologic grade than ROI defined for the whole tumor in cross-section.
A metaanalysis was based on 98 quantitative MR image breast tumor characterizations acquired in 3 separate experimental studies using identical methods for tumor induction and contrast enhancement.
The endothelial transfer coefficient (K) of albumin (Gd-DTPA)30 from the tumor periphery correlated (r = 0.784) significantly more strongly (P < 0.001) with the pathologic tumor grade than K derived from the whole tumor (r = 0.604). K estimates, either from the tumor periphery or from the whole tumor, correlated significantly more strongly with histologic grade (P < 0.01) than MR image estimates of fractional plasma volume (fPV) from either tumor periphery (r = 0.368) or whole tumor (r = 0.323).
K estimates from the tumor periphery were the best of these measurable MR image microvascular characteristics for predicting the histologic grade.
Available from: Ning Lv
- "Thus, although choosing an ROI affected the diagnostic results, few authors have addressed this problem. We believe that this finding has important technical and clinical implications . Diffusion-weighted MRI reflects the Brownian motion of water molecules, which provides information about the cellular environment . "
[Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Malignant axillary lymph nodes are an important predictor for breast cancer recurrence, but invasive dissection or biopsy is required for the diagnosis. We determined whether and how malignant nodes could be diagnosed preoperatively with magnetic resonance (MR) imaging.
We obtained MR images of all women evaluated for breast cancer at the Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center in 2010 and correlated the image characteristics of each axillary node with the pathologic diagnosis of the same node.
We analyzed 251 nodes (117 benign; 134 malignant) from 136 women (mean age, 44 years; range, 20-67). Mean diameter of the nodes was 18 mm (range, 5-58 mm). With pathologic diagnosis as the reference standard, MRI-based interpretations were 66.4% sensitive, 94% specific, and 79% accurate. Diameter, pathologic type, apparent diffusion coefficient value (ADC, b=500 and 800), time-intensity curve (TIC) type of breast tumors correlated with node metastasis; ADC value (b=500 and 800), TIC type, early enhancement rate, long-axis, short-axis, shape, margin and the location of nodes correlated with node metastasis (P<0.001 for all). Tumor immunohistochemistry results for estrogen receptors, progesterone receptors, c-erbB-2, vascular endothelial growth factor, and Ki67 were not. An MRI-based lymph node scoring system based on these correlations had a specificity of 91%, a sensitivity of 93%, and an area under the ROC curve of 0.95 (P<0.001).
Metastatic axillary lymph nodes can be accurately diagnosed by MR in women with early breast cancer preoperatively and non-invasively. The scoring system appears to be superior to current methods.
European journal of radiology 04/2012; 81(10):2602-12. DOI:10.1016/j.ejrad.2012.03.019 · 2.37 Impact Factor
Available from: Katja C Siegmann-Luz
[Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: We sought to investigate the potential value of magnetic resonance (MR) elastography to improve the differentiation between benign and malignant tumors.
Measurements of 5 patients with 6 malignant lesions, 11 patients with benign lesions, and 4 patients with no lesions at all were performed at 1.5 Tesla. After breast MR imaging, MR elastography was performed as a targeted measurement. Low-frequency mechanical waves (65 Hz) were transmitted into the breast tissue using an oscillator and were displayed by means of a MR sequence within the phase of the MR image. After reconstruction, the viscoelastic information was correlated with the signal intensity and morphology data.
All examinations were technically successful realized in approximately 25 minutes. Malignant tumors documented higher values of elasticity than benign corresponding with signal intensity and morphologic data.
A good separation exists between benign and malignant lesions in elasticity, corresponding with specific signal intensity and morphologic data. Further clinical studies with a larger number of patients are needed for extended validation.
Investigative Radiology 08/2005; 40(7):412-20. DOI:10.1097/01.rli.0000166940.72971.4a · 4.44 Impact Factor
[Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of gadoteridol, B22956/1 (a new protein binding blood pool contrast agent), and (Gd-DTPA)37-albumin in detecting, by dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), the effect in vivo of tamoxifen in an experimental model of breast tumor implanted in rats.
Tumors were induced by subcutaneous injection of 10 mammary adenocarcinoma cells (13762 MAT B III). Treatment with tamoxifen (or vehicle) started on day 4 after implantation. On day 10 after implantation, animals were observed by MRI using B22956/1 (or gadoteridol) and, 24 hours later, using (Gd-DTPA)37-albumin.
Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging data showed that tamoxifen treatment decreased vascular permeability to B22956/1, whereas no difference was detectable in permeability to gadoteridol or to (Gd-DTPA)37-albumin. No effect on fractional plasma volume was detected with either of contrast agents.
B22956/1 is superior to both small Gd chelates and macromolecular contrast agents in the assessment of the effect of tamoxifen treatment on tumor vasculature.
Investigative Radiology 08/2005; 40(7):421-9. DOI:10.1097/01.rli.0000167124.89782.db · 4.44 Impact Factor
Data provided are for informational purposes only. Although carefully collected, accuracy cannot be guaranteed. The impact factor represents a rough estimation of the journal's impact factor and does not reflect the actual current impact factor. Publisher conditions are provided by RoMEO. Differing provisions from the publisher's actual policy or licence agreement may be applicable.