Improvement in automatic postural coordination following Alexander Technique lessons in a person with low back pain

Neurological Sciences Institute, Oregon Health and Sciences University, Portland, OR, USA.
Physical Therapy (Impact Factor: 2.53). 07/2005; 85(6):565-78.
Source: PubMed


The relationship between abnormal postural coordination and back pain is unclear. The Alexander Technique (AT) aims to improve postural coordination by using conscious processes to alter automatic postural coordination and ongoing muscular activity, and it has been reported to reduce low back pain. This case report describes the use of the AT with a client with low back pain and the observed changes in automatic postural responses and back pain.
The client was a 49-year-old woman with a 25-year history of left-sided, idiopathic, lumbrosacral back pain. Automatic postural coordination was measured using a force plate during horizontal platform translations and one-legged standing.
The client was tested monthly for 4 months before AT lessons and for 3 months after lessons. Before lessons, she consistently had laterally asymmetric automatic postural responses to translations. After AT lessons, the magnitude and asymmetry of her responses and balance improved and her low back pain decreased.
Further research is warranted to study whether AT lessons improve low back pain-associated abnormalities in automatic postural coordination and whether improving automatic postural coordination helps to reduce low back pain.

Download full-text


Available from: Fay Horak, Oct 28, 2014
  • Source
    • "It is unclear though whether individuals develop altered static and dynamic loading patterns prior to or subsequent to the first bout of pain (Jones et al., 2012). Subjects with lower back pain are also reported to have deficits in standing and seated balance and automatic postural coordination (Cacciatore et al., 2005). In riders the incidence of lower back pain was reported to be higher than the incidence found in the general population (Kraft et al., 2007; 2009), but it is unclear whether risks are discipline specific (Quinn and Bird, 1996; Kraft et al., 2009). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Since the ability to train the horse to be ambidextrous is considered highly desirable, rider asymmetry is recognized as a negative trait. Acquired postural and functional asymmetry can originate from numerous anatomical regions, so it is difficult to suggest if any is developed due to riding. The aim of this study was therefore to assess symmetry of posture, strength and flexibility in a large population of riders and to determine whether typical traits exist due to riding. 127 right handed riders from the UK and USA were categorized according to years riding (in 20 year increments) and their competition level (using affiliated test levels). Leg length, grip strength and spinal posture were measured and recorded by a physiotherapist. Standing and sitting posture and trunk flexibility were measured with 3-D motion capture technology. Right-left differences were explored in relation to years riding and rider competitive experience. Significant anatomical asymmetry was found for the difference in standing acromion process height for a competition level (-0.07±1.50 cm Intro/Prelim; 0.02±1.31 cm Novice; 0.43±1.27 cm Elementary+; p=0.048) and for sitting iliac crest height for years riding (-0.23±1.36 cm Intro/Prelim; 0.01±1.50 cm Novice; 0.86±0.41 cm Elementary+; p=0.021). For functional asymmetry, a significant interaction was found for lateral bending ROM for years riding x competition level (p=0.047). The demands on dressage riders competing at higher levels may predispose these riders to a higher risk of developing asymmetry and potentially chronic back pain rather than improving their symmetry.
    Journal of Human Kinetics 09/2014; 42(1):113-125. DOI:10.2478/hukin-2014-0066 · 1.03 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "Unfortunately, these issues often do not give rise to any immediate symptoms but present themselves much later in life when accumulated damage has already happended to the musculoskeletal system. Somatic re-education techniques, such as the Alexander Technique (AT) [2], which aim at increasing body awareness, have been clinically shown to have long-term benefits for several conditions including chronic back pain [8] [3] and Parkinson's disease [13]. However, such practices are not widely adopted because of several reasons, including cost, lack of insurance coverage and limited numbers of certified practitioners [1]. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: We propose SomaTech, a Kinect-based system that encourages users to expand understanding and awareness of their everyday movements. The system creates real-time auditory feedback based on the user's whole action, aiming toward re-education of habitual, potentially unsound movement patterns which are often ingrained within the brain. To do this, we draw inspiration from the field of somatics, which has well-studied prophylactic benefits. Our initial evaluation shows promising results that users become more aware of movement choices and are able to improve their efficiency after using the system.
    ACM CHI Extended Abstracts; 04/2014
  • Source
    • "Individuals with LBP respond to unexpected translation of the support surface using a trunk stiffening strategy, mediated through co-activation of the trunk musculature that may require less specific knowledge of the nature of the postural perturbation. Alteration of the corrective strategy could be mediated through changes in central set, defined as " a central preparatory state within the nervous system related to higher-level task-related intentions and expectations " that can influence postural responses, both expected and unexpected [Cacciatore, et al., 2005]. Horak, Diener and Nashner [Horak, et al., 1989] reported a " nonspecific enhanced [postural] response " with unexpected perturbations of balance suggesting that healthy individuals set a higher default response magnitude in the absence of accurate information about the perturbation. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: There is increasing evidence that individuals with non-specific low back pain (LBP) have altered movement coordination. However, the relationship of this neuromotor impairment to recurrent pain episodes is unknown. To assess coordination while minimizing the confounding influences of pain we characterized automatic postural responses to multi-directional support surface translations in individuals with a history of LBP who were not in an active episode of their pain. Twenty subjects with and 21 subjects without non-specific LBP stood on a platform that was translated unexpectedly in 12 directions. Net joint torques of the ankles, knees, hips, and trunk in the frontal and sagittal planes as well as surface electromyographs of 12 lower leg and trunk muscles were compared across perturbation directions to determine if individuals with LBP responded using a trunk stiffening strategy. Individuals with LBP demonstrated reduced peak trunk torques, and enhanced activation of the trunk and ankle muscle responses following perturbations. These results suggest that individuals with LBP use a strategy of trunk stiffening achieved through co-activation of trunk musculature, aided by enhanced distal responses, to respond to unexpected support surface perturbations. Notably, these neuromotor alterations persisted between active pain periods and could represent either movement patterns that have developed in response to pain or could reflect underlying impairments that may contribute to recurrent episodes of LBP.
    Journal of electromyography and kinesiology: official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology 11/2011; 22(1):13-20. DOI:10.1016/j.jelekin.2011.10.006 · 1.65 Impact Factor
Show more